I have a fresh install of RC2 on a new firewall and when i try to
install clamav it instantly says installation complete without
downloading anything and i cant start or run the clamav service or
freshclam via the web interface. Is there a problem with the clamav
package or is it a problem on my
There are only a few packages working atm. I think ClamAV is not finished yet.
We'll have to review packages before pfSense 1.0 is released and divide them in
known working packages and alpha/beta packages.
Holger
-Original Message-
From: Nick Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
On 8/3/06, Jonathan Wanak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to get the serial console to work. I'm running pfSense RC2, on the hard drive on
a PII Dell Optiplex, connected to my Windows XP machine with a null modem cable. Connection
settings are 9600/8/N/1/HW handshaking. I have
Holger Bauer wrote:
There are only a few packages working atm. I think ClamAV is not finished yet.
We'll have to review packages before pfSense 1.0 is released and divide them in
known working packages and alpha/beta packages.
Holger
Is there a list of the few that are working? Were they
If they're broken now, they were broken then. No packages have suffered
any regression (at least not yet). ClamAV and HAVP are both known to be
broken at this time. There are reports that Scott's recent patches have
brought Squid to a working state. SpamD works great!
Nick Smith wrote:
Read the packagedescription at the packagemanager page. Some are marked broken
or have som ekind of information about their current state.
Holger
-Original Message-
From: Gary Buckmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 3:14 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Gary Buckmaster wrote:
Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 8/3/06, Gary Buckmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aren't those Opteron based? If so, then you're out of luck, because
pfSense is currently not an x64 platform.
Opterons will run just fine on 32 bit as well as 64 bit. One of our
builder servers
On 8/4/06, Nick Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about a sparc64? like a sun u2? will it run on that?
No, I am affraid not.
Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
I can't get the most basic of basic routing to work.
Here's my network setup
Intel computer with 512 ram and new xeon.
Two Intel PWLA8492MT Dual port Gig-E Cards plus 2 onboard intel Gig-E ports.
DSL Modem (Subnet A)
|
pfSense WAN (Subnet A)
|
PfSense LAN (Subnet B)
|
Computers
On 8/4/06, Nick Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gary Buckmaster wrote:
Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 8/3/06, Gary Buckmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aren't those Opteron based? If so, then you're out of luck, because
pfSense is currently not an x64 platform.
Opterons will run just fine on 32
Anyone have luck running the Marvell Yukon Chipset, the sun
servers I am looking at purchasing use this chipset and I dont see them
listed under the Hardware section on the website.
Regards
There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can
read binary, and those who cannot.
On 8/4/06, Scott Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone have luck running the Marvell Yukon Chipset, the sun servers I am
looking at purchasing use this chipset and I don't see them listed under the
Hardware section on the website.
I believe that they work now in 6.1 but you may want to
Changing the appropriate line did the trick. Thank you very much!
--Jon
- Original Message
From: Charles Sprickman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: support@pfsense.com
Sent: Friday, August 4, 2006 12:28:48 AM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Trouble accessing console via serial connection
On Thu,
If bridging is not an option I would recommend setting 1:1 mappings for
each public address. It will work beautifully and will also allow you
to set up two separate networks.
-Tim
-Original Message-
From: A. Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 7:29 AM
To:
I can't set up a 1:1 as the wan interface is on a different subnet than my
lan interface
From: Tim Dickson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: support@pfsense.com
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Can't get basic routing to work.
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 12:13:53 -0700
If
oh, and the computers also need to have public IPs not private IPs
routing is exactly what I need and it should be the simplest thing possible
to do
any clue what could be causing the issue?
From: Tim Dickson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: support@pfsense.com
To: support@pfsense.com
That's the whole point. Please read the documentation, and research 1:1
NAT to see why it will work for this purpose.
A. Jones wrote:
I can't set up a 1:1 as the wan interface is on a different subnet
than my lan interface
From: Tim Dickson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To:
Just curios, how many ip's do you have? Have you tried setting this up in
an isolated network just to see if it works? I had a problem with bellsouth
not really assigning all of the ip addresses they claim they did. The first
two in the range were reserved, yet they reported them. When i
I have a whole subnet, routing is what I need.
The computers also MUST have public IP addresses assigned to their
interfaces.
That will also screw me over when one of the subnets needs to talk to the
other subnet using public IPs
On 8/4/06, A. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a whole subnet, routing is what I need.
The computers also MUST have public IP addresses assigned to their
interfaces.
That will also screw me over when one of the subnets needs to talk to the
other subnet using public IPs
traces to any part of my subnet from random systems on the net all get to
the WAN interface and then they start getting dropped (even with the
firewall completely turned off). So I know that the IPs are properly routed
to me.
Thanks for a reasonable response.
It's much appreciated.
P.S. the
I tried both and no dice.
That's why I'm completely vexed and why I posted to the mailing list... =o/
The odd thing is that it works with NAT enabled.
Any other guesses as to what could possibly be going on?
Thanks.
From: Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: support@pfsense.com
To:
On 8/4/06, A. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried both and no dice.
That's why I'm completely vexed and why I posted to the mailing list... =o/
The odd thing is that it works with NAT enabled.
Any other guesses as to what could possibly be going on?
Nope. The two methods I mentioned
On 8/4/06, A. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is why I'm so confused...
There is no reason why it should not work.
Is there a way for me to see what the system is doing to the individual
packets?
tcpdump.
-
To
Thanks.
I'll see what I can figure out when everyone is off the network in half an
hour.
From: Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: support@pfsense.com
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Can't get basic routing to work.
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 16:48:40 -0400
On
A. Jones wrote:
This is why I'm so confused...
There is no reason why it should not work.
Is there a way for me to see what the system is doing to the
individual packets?
The scenario, exactly as you described, works for me very well without
NAT-ing the public IP-s behind the firewall.
Do
On 8/4/06, A. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a whole subnet, routing is what I need.
The computers also MUST have public IP addresses assigned to their
interfaces.
That will also screw me over when one of the subnets needs to talk to the
other subnet using public IPs
The original rule on the firewall is already good for that.
From: Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: support@pfsense.com
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Can't get basic routing to work.
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 16:32:28 -0500
On 8/4/06, A. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I already tried those.
I have a feeling I know what is going wrong, I'll keep you all posted when I
verify/disprove myself.
Thanks everyone.
From: Jan Zorz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: support@pfsense.com
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Can't get basic routing to work.
Not for inbound traffic it isn't.
--Bill
On 8/4/06, A. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The original rule on the firewall is already good for that.
From: Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: support@pfsense.com
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Can't get basic routing
When you send (initiate) a packet out on port abc, and it is allowed
through, the firewall opens up a hole (which is stored in the state table)
that allows a response from the IP the packet was sent to on the return port
specified in the packet.
You use inbound rules (WAN-LAN) when you want
On 8/4/06, A. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When you send (initiate) a packet out on port abc, and it is allowed
through, the firewall opens up a hole (which is stored in the state table)
that allows a response from the IP the packet was sent to on the return port
specified in the packet.
You
Is Intel PWLA8494MT supported with the current build (1.0RC2)? I have
installed this card on a system with 2 Gb Intel port on the mother
board and the system does not appear to recognize it. Any idea?
Thanks
Pierre
-
To
33 matches
Mail list logo
