I've noticed that the ral driver in FreeBSD 6.2 support many boards in the
market and the Kernel in pfsense don't
The key is the file if_ral_pci.c
static const struct ral_pci_ident ral_pci_ids[] = {
{ 0x1814, 0x0201, Ralink Technology RT2560 },
{ 0x1814, 0x0301, Ralink
Hi,
I imported my config from an older pfSense
(*RELENG_1_SNAPSHOT_03-10-2006*) into a newer version (in a different host)
The newer one (a recent snapshot) complained about the length of the
names of some aliases.
Is there really a restriction?
Can I download the XML file and replace the
Try a snapshot which is based on 6.2. If you find that they are still
not present that means they where added to RELEN_6, not 6.2
Scott
On 3/15/07, Pedro Paulo Oliveira Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've noticed that the ral driver in FreeBSD 6.2 support many boards in the
market and the
On 3/15/07, Rainer Duffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I imported my config from an older pfSense
(*RELENG_1_SNAPSHOT_03-10-2006*) into a newer version (in a different host)
The newer one (a recent snapshot) complained about the length of the
names of some aliases.
Is there really a
On 3/15/07, Ying Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have snort running on the LAN interface instead of a WAN. The reason
for this is so I can block individual users that uses MSN/IM/P2P and not
the other way around.
Snort detects the violations and blocks the private ips accordingly but
The latest snort I see is STABLE, 2.6.1.3_2, platform: 1.0. I did a
uninstall , refresh pkg_mgr.php page.
Should I upgrade to the latest PFSense snapshot? Thanks!
- Ying
Scott Ullrich wrote:
There was a recent update to snort that might fix this. Please upgrade
your snort package.
Scott
On 3/15/07, Ying Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The latest snort I see is STABLE, 2.6.1.3_2, platform: 1.0. I did a
uninstall , refresh pkg_mgr.php page.
Should I upgrade to the latest PFSense snapshot? Thanks!
Not sure that this is necessary if it works partially. We have only
suggested
Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 3/15/07, Ying Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The latest snort I see is STABLE, 2.6.1.3_2, platform: 1.0. I did a
uninstall , refresh pkg_mgr.php page.
Should I upgrade to the latest PFSense snapshot? Thanks!
Not sure that this is necessary if it works partially. We
On 3/15/07, Ying Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If a upgrade of pfsense is not necessary, then I did have the latest
snort package installed. I can't seems to find much documentation on
snort2c either, or a sample white list.
Neither could I when I ported snort2c to FreeBSD/pfSense. The source
I need to limit http access to all sites but 15 on the internet. Is this
possible? If so how would I do this.
thanks
The only docs I found was in the source as well.
Snorts version number I mentioned above was from the command line,
Snort exiting
# Version 2.6.1.3 (Build 36)
I will install _2 just in case afterwards.
Thanks for your input Scott.
- Ying
Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 3/15/07, Ying Wong [EMAIL
Unfortunately its ignoring the white list altogether with _2. I would
love to help rectify this problem but I am not familiar with Snort as
much as I would like to be.
Also, as you're probably aware, there's a bug in the config generator.
Snort will not start unless the redundant forward
Hi
if i understand right you would give Clients on the lan
access to only 15 Sites and nothing more?
so you have two options,
a)
create allow rules for dns, smtp pop3,imap, or what else is required,
create also pass rules that aloow access to this 15 sites
hint this sites can be hacked in an
Hi
I've set up 2 PFSENSE machines with CARP and it seems to work well
although I find the following messages in the system log of the BACKUP
machine :
kernel : arp_rtrequest : bad gateway 111.222.333.444 (!AF_LINK)
A communications error occurred when attempting XMLRPC sync with
111.222.333.111
14 matches
Mail list logo
