[pfSense Support] Problem with Polish provider

2008-01-16 Thread Markus Helfrich
Hello, as i ask the List Year, i still have the Problem with an Polish Provider and the Hardware. I have a PFsense wall with a Jetway Board (1,2 GHz 2x GB Ethernet). The Provider uses dhcp and the PRovider inteface has 100 mBit Full-Duplex. No PPoE or something, direct IP via DHCP (auth is

RE: [pfSense Support] Making a VPN Connection

2008-01-16 Thread Ron Lemon
Hi Jeroen, OK. I have the router being configured for IPSec. Are there any tips or tricks to getting this to work? Thanks. From: Jeroen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 6:42 AM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support]

Re: [pfSense Support] Making a VPN Connection

2008-01-16 Thread Curtis LaMasters
Here's a link to the best documentation currently available that I know of. http://doc.m0n0.ch/handbook/examplevpn.html#id2606293 Curtis

Re: [pfSense Support] Problem with Polish provider

2008-01-16 Thread Curtis LaMasters
Markus, Have you tried hooking up a typical laptop (xp, vista, linux) to the network connection and gotten a reliable connection with dhcp? Curtis

RE: [pfSense Support] PPPOE with static IP

2008-01-16 Thread Ryan Rodrigue
Thanks for the replys. First, i corrected the issue with the lack of a second DNS last week. My internet is up and working. The thing is that i am not getting the same IP address i used to. I think this is yet another stupid change. I tried a cheap linksys router that lets me manually put in

Re: [pfSense Support] PPPOE with static IP

2008-01-16 Thread Curtis LaMasters
It appears you are on an older version of pfSense. Try upgrading to 1.2rc3or wait till 1.2rc4 comes out within the next couple of weeks. Curtis On Jan 16, 2008 9:27 AM, Ryan Rodrigue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the replys. First, i corrected the issue with the lack of a second DNS

RE: [pfSense Support] Making a VPN Connection

2008-01-16 Thread Ron Lemon
Thanks Curtis I will give it ago as soon as they tell me my IP Sec is ready. Ron From: Curtis LaMasters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 10:02 AM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Making a VPN Connection Here's

RE: [pfSense Support] PPPOE with static IP

2008-01-16 Thread Ryan Rodrigue
I am on 1.2-RC3 built on Wed Nov 7 19:02:16 EST 2007 why do you say that? is the ability to put ip in PPPOE supposed to be added? -Original Message- From: Curtis LaMasters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 9:31 AM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense

Re: [pfSense Support] Problem with Polish provider

2008-01-16 Thread Markus Helfrich
Hi, not a laptop but Zyxcel Router with dhcp enabled. This appliance works with no problems Markus Curtis LaMasters schrieb: Markus, Have you tried hooking up a typical laptop (xp, vista, linux) to the network connection and gotten a reliable connection with dhcp? Curtis --

Re: [pfSense Support] PPPOE with static IP

2008-01-16 Thread Curtis LaMasters
I guess i shouldn't have assumed that you were on an older version, but your reference to how you added the IP addresses arp and other, were more like the terms used for 1.01 and not 1.2rc2 and 1.2rc3 where proxy arp, carp and ip were the options. Sorry for the misinformation. Curtis On Jan 16,

Re: [pfSense Support] Problem with Polish provider

2008-01-16 Thread Curtis LaMasters
With pfSense in place did you get any wierd log messages relating to arp? How is your ISP delivering their connectivity to you? Curtis On Jan 16, 2008 10:02 AM, Markus Helfrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, not a laptop but Zyxcel Router with dhcp enabled. This appliance works with no

[pfSense Support] Pfsense + OpenVPN + Kvpnc with certificates

2008-01-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, did anyone install pfsense with such configuration? I am using it with the Windows GUI (Mathias one, very good indeed) but I am unable to configure it using KVPNC on Fedora. Could anyone help? TIA, Giuseppe Marullo - To

[pfSense Support] 1.2-RC4 released!

2008-01-16 Thread Chris Buechler
The pfSense development team is happy to bring you the final release candidate in the 1.2 series! Info here: http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=164 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

[pfSense Support] RE: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released!

2008-01-16 Thread Ryan Rodrigue
16, 2008 12:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released! The pfSense development team is happy to bring you the final release candidate in the 1.2 series! Info here: http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=164 __ NOD32 2798 (20080116) Information

Re: [pfSense Support] RE: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released!

2008-01-16 Thread Daniel Lloyd
! The pfSense development team is happy to bring you the final release candidate in the 1.2 series! Info here: http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=164 __ NOD32 2798 (20080116) Information __ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com

Re: [pfSense Support] RE: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released!

2008-01-16 Thread Scott Ullrich
On Jan 16, 2008 5:34 PM, Ryan Rodrigue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyne downloaded this successfully? I have, but i keep getting an error. unexpected end of archive. Im using WinRar which has always worked in the past. I even tried from different mirrors. This seems to occur every

RE: [pfSense Support] RE: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released!

2008-01-16 Thread Ryan Rodrigue
using forefox. i will try IE -Original Message- From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 4:36 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] RE: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released! On Jan 16, 2008 5:34 PM, Ryan Rodrigue [EMAIL

Re: [pfSense Support] RE: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released!

2008-01-16 Thread Scott Ullrich
On Jan 16, 2008 5:57 PM, Ryan Rodrigue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: using forefox. i will try IE I have yet to see this behavior with Firefox. Scott

Re: [pfSense Support] RE: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released!

2008-01-16 Thread Jeroen
On Jan 16, 2008 11:35 PM, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This seems to occur every release. Are you using IE? If so, then IE automatically decompresses the file and forgets to change the filename suffix. Scott PS: If you are using IE, try firefox. Same here with FF. Downloaded

Re: [pfSense Support] RE: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released!

2008-01-16 Thread Scott Ullrich
On Jan 16, 2008 5:39 PM, Jeroen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Same here with FF. Downloaded from http://pfsense.iserv.nl/updates/. Sigh. I'll gzip -d the file on the server and allow the .iso to be populated to the mirros without any type of compression. Sorry ISP's! Scott

Re: [pfSense Support] RE: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released!

2008-01-16 Thread Jeroen
On Jan 16, 2008 11:50 PM, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 16, 2008 5:39 PM, Jeroen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Same here with FF. Downloaded from http://pfsense.iserv.nl/updates/. Sigh. I'll gzip -d the file on the server and allow the .iso to be populated to the mirros

RE: [pfSense Support] RE: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released!

2008-01-16 Thread Ryan Rodrigue
At least its not just me. I think i'll get it from my house tonight. I have cable there. um.. I was trying to get the update, not the full install. Thanks for your help. Ryan -Original Message- From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 4:51 PM

Re: [pfSense Support] RE: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released!

2008-01-16 Thread Scott Ullrich
On Jan 16, 2008 5:57 PM, Jeroen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's not a problem with the browser. I just downloaded it using wget and un-tarred it on my linux box. This works. When I open the file (the exact same file via SMB) using winRar it failes. So i think winrar can't handle the file. Why?

Re: [pfSense Support] RE: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released!

2008-01-16 Thread Jeroen
On Jan 17, 2008 12:01 AM, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can you try 7zip for kicks? It's free. Sure, just tried and it works. Strange behaviour on winrar's part. First time I ever encountered this. -- Jeroen

Re: [pfSense Support] RE: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released!

2008-01-16 Thread Scott Ullrich
On Jan 16, 2008 6:16 PM, Ryan Rodrigue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At least its not just me. I think i'll get it from my house tonight. I have cable there. um.. I was trying to get the update, not the full install. Thanks for your help. Ryan You do not need to extract the update file.

RE: [pfSense Support] RE: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released!

2008-01-16 Thread Ryan Rodrigue
alright. Im goofy. I guess i just got used to decompressing the image before burning to cd. And the 7zip works fine for the ISO. thanks, Ryan -Original Message- From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 5:03 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re:

Re: [pfSense Support] RE: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released!

2008-01-16 Thread Jeroen
Just installed it on my home router and at first glance works like a charm (as always). Thanks to the team for all your effort. pfSense is great product and I have been using it for many years now. -- Jeroen

Re: [pfSense Support] RE: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released!

2008-01-16 Thread Jeroen
On Jan 17, 2008 12:35 AM, Ryan Rodrigue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: alright. Im goofy. I guess i just got used to decompressing the image before burning to cd. And the 7zip works fine for the ISO. thanks, Ryan Not really, it's also just smart to check whether the archive is in mint

Re: [pfSense Support] RE: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released!

2008-01-16 Thread Ngawang Sangye
i did the firmware upgrade with the update, I don't see that it has been upgraded? How can you see if the upgrade was successful? Thanks Sangye On 17/01/2008, Jeroen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 17, 2008 12:35 AM, Ryan Rodrigue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: alright. Im goofy. I guess i

[pfSense Support] Wifi NIC

2008-01-16 Thread MyStiC
I have an Airlink 101 MIMO XR PCI and am trying to use it as the WAN. The first problem is pfSense doesn't show it's match as an option, if there is a fix for this, I could problably take it from there. Is this possible if so, how. I'm running the latest greatest RC4.

[pfSense Support] 802.11x

2008-01-16 Thread Richard Sperry
Does anyone know if 802.11x is enabled on the WAN? I have really slow speeds on comcrap, and I know this is an issue if your running windows.

Re: [pfSense Support] 802.11x

2008-01-16 Thread Bill Marquette
On Jan 16, 2008 8:04 PM, Richard Sperry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone know if 802.11x is enabled on the WAN? I have really slow speeds on comcrap, and I know this is an issue if your running windows. Not that I'm aware of and I've never had issues with either of my current Comcast wans

Re: [pfSense Support] 802.11x

2008-01-16 Thread Sean Cavanaugh
I get all 16 mbit of my comcast connection here. if anything pfsense runs BETTER than crappy linksys/netgear/dlink/belkin standalone routers for broadband connections. windows systems have no issue -Sean From: Richard Sperry Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 9:04 PM To: support@pfsense.com

Re: [pfSense Support] 802.11x

2008-01-16 Thread Curtis LaMasters
I guess I'm failing to put this together802.11x is a wireless standard that has not yet been defined...and 802.1x is network access control...does Comcast require this? Curtis

Re: [pfSense Support] 802.11x

2008-01-16 Thread Bill Marquette
On Jan 16, 2008 10:06 PM, Curtis LaMasters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I guess I'm failing to put this together802.11x is a wireless standard that has not yet been defined...and 802.1x is network access control...does Comcast require this? Good point...I kinda assumed the 1x was meant and not

Re: [pfSense Support] 802.11x

2008-01-16 Thread Curtis LaMasters
That's kind of what I was thinking. Curtis

[pfSense Support] Traffic Graph kills FireFox 2.0.0.11

2008-01-16 Thread Chuck Benson
I see some earlier discussion of either the same or a similar problem on the forum, but with no resolution. I upgraded to 1.2-RC4 and still have crashes trying to display the traffic graph. I would install the Adobe viewer, but see that it is scheduled for end of life. Any work around for

Re: [pfSense Support] RE: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released!

2008-01-16 Thread RB
Meh. I ran the upgrade from 1.2-RC3 and DNS got hosed. I've swapped it over to my dev server in the meantime, but the problem is that nothing is actually listening on UDP 53. On 1/16/08, Ngawang Sangye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i did the firmware upgrade with the update, I don't see that it has

Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic Graph kills FireFox 2.0.0.11

2008-01-16 Thread Scott Ullrich
On Jan 16, 2008 11:53 PM, Chuck Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see some earlier discussion of either the same or a similar problem on the forum, but with no resolution. I upgraded to 1.2-RC4 and still have crashes trying to display the traffic graph. I would install the Adobe viewer, but

Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic Graph kills FireFox 2.0.0.11

2008-01-16 Thread RB
On Jan 16, 2008 10:22 PM, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I cannot duplicate this behavior on OSX nor on Windows Xp. Anyone else? OSX negative - both the full graph and the embedded ones (5 concurrent) in the Dashboard package.

Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic Graph kills FireFox 2.0.0.11

2008-01-16 Thread Chuck Benson
RB wrote: On Jan 16, 2008 10:22 PM, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I cannot duplicate this behavior on OSX nor on Windows Xp. Anyone else? OSX negative - both the full graph and the embedded ones (5 concurrent) in the Dashboard package.

Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic Graph kills FireFox 2.0.0.11

2008-01-16 Thread Scott Ullrich
On Jan 17, 2008 1:24 AM, Chuck Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The only additions I can make right now, are that I did try with a priv account with all extensions disabled. The fault occurs in ivplugin.dll. Good ol' Norton Internet Security installed?? Scott