RE: [pfSense Support] More Ethernet ports on a pfsense box

2008-04-09 Thread Ryan Rodrigue
. For that matter, I'm curious what kind of port-density you're looking for. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ NOD32 3012 (20080409) Information

Re: [pfSense Support] More Ethernet ports on a pfsense box

2008-04-09 Thread RB
On 4/9/08, Ryan Rodrigue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What are the cost on these boxes? Does anyone know where they can be purchased? Thanks Seems a lot of these manufacturers OEM the boxes for appliance vendors; most I've contacted have been pretty willing to sell to individuals, however. The

RE: [pfSense Support] More Ethernet ports on a pfsense box

2008-04-09 Thread Ryan Rodrigue
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ NOD32 3013 (20080409) Information __ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

RE: [pfSense Support] LogMe In Block!!

2008-04-09 Thread Christopher Iarocci
Since he is trying to allow logmein, I don't think this is all that helpful. ;-) Chris -Original Message- From: Christoph Hanle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 3:32 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] LogMe In Block!! Sebastián Veloso Varas

[pfSense Support] Some basic rules help with IPSEC VPN

2008-04-09 Thread Paul Cockings
Hello pfsense list, I have two pfsense 1.2's One at home, one at work. I've created an IPSEC tunnel between them and can ping various devices from the 'other side' but can't get to anything using tcp or udp - I'm pretty sure this is me being dumbI think I'm muddling the direction of

Re: [pfSense Support] LogMe In Block!!

2008-04-09 Thread Christoph Hanle
Christopher Iarocci schrieb: Since he is trying to allow logmein, I don't think this is all that helpful. ;-) Chris Oh shit, I had misinterpreted / translated to leak logmein ))-; . But now Sebastian has possible solutions, if he reads the privacy Policy, Terms and Conditions, etc. of

Re: [pfSense Support] Some basic rules help with IPSEC VPN

2008-04-09 Thread Vivek Khera
On Apr 9, 2008, at 12:38 PM, Paul Cockings wrote: RULES : IPSEC : TCP SRC:192.168.8.0/24 * DST 192.168.101.0/24 * * RULES : IPSEC : UDP SRC:192.168.8.0/24 * DST 192.168.101.0/24 * * RULES : IPSEC : ICMP SRC:192.168.8.0/24 * DST 192.168.101.0/24 * * For my IPSEC rules, I have just a single

Re: [pfSense Support] Constant reboots in 1.2-RC4

2008-04-09 Thread Andy Dills
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008, Chris Buechler wrote: There are a lot of crappy Realtek NICs out there, but I'm surprised you're seeing this on a HeroLogic board. I use a number of different embedded hardware platforms with Realtek NICs, including a HeroLogic HL-462 they contributed to the project, and

Re: [pfSense Support] More Ethernet ports on a pfsense box

2008-04-09 Thread Levi Clark
Tim, I have been looking for a way to add a good quad nic card into pfsense as well. Can you or anyone else confirm using the Sun Quad 10/100 with part number 501-5406 with pfsense? Thanks! On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 11:04 PM, Tim Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been using Sun Quad Fast

Re: [pfSense Support] More Ethernet ports on a pfsense box

2008-04-09 Thread Tim Nelson
I'll have to check a few of my systems when I arrive home to double check the part number. The chipsets on the Sun cards tend to be either Intel or DEC based. pfSense/FreeBSD shows the interface names as hme0-3. I can only assume hme stands for Happy Meal Ethernet... odd naming. I'll let you

Re: [pfSense Support] More Ethernet ports on a pfsense box

2008-04-09 Thread Vivek Khera
On Apr 9, 2008, at 4:46 PM, Tim Nelson wrote: pfSense/FreeBSD shows the interface names as hme0-3. I can only assume hme stands for Happy Meal Ethernet man hme on a freebsd 6.3 system tells me this: NAME hme -- Sun Microelectronics STP2002-STQ Ethernet interfaces device driver

[pfSense Support] System Time

2008-04-09 Thread Ryan Rodrigue
I love these machines. Aside from a person steping on one and breaking the motherboard, I don't think i have had any unit fail in the field. Thanks, I have just a quick question. Is there any place to see the system time on the webgui? I was looking at some logs and the time was off. I couldnt

Re: [pfSense Support] System Time

2008-04-09 Thread Curtis LaMasters
status.php probably has it somewhere. If not you could issue a command via the GUI in the diagnostic menu. -- Curtis LaMasters http://www.curtis-lamasters.com http://www.builtnetworks.com

Re: [pfSense Support] Constant reboots in 1.2-RC4

2008-04-09 Thread Chris Buechler
Andy Dills wrote: Good news, it appears my assumption was correct. There exists a flaw in the realtek chipset (as quoted earlier in the thread), and it appears that a patch to the driver has been created: http://www.nabble.com/RELENG_7-panic-td16285669.html that is good news. Do you know

Re: [pfSense Support] Constant reboots in 1.2-RC4

2008-04-09 Thread Andy Dills
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Chris Buechler wrote: Andy Dills wrote: Good news, it appears my assumption was correct. There exists a flaw in the realtek chipset (as quoted earlier in the thread), and it appears that a patch to the driver has been created:

[pfSense Support] Driver streamline

2008-04-09 Thread José Moreira
hello, i have an ASUS RS100-E4/PI2 ( http://www.asus.com.tw/products.aspx?l1=9l2=40l3=116model=1476modelmenu=2) server with UKON MARVELL 88E8056 Gigabit- ( http://www.marvell.com/drivers/driverDisplay.do?dId=139pId=35) network cards. the drivers are available at the website and i am trying to

Re: [pfSense Support] More Ethernet ports on a pfsense box

2008-04-09 Thread Bill Marquette
Sun engineers have a McDonalds down the hall. http://blogs.sun.com/mikebelch/entry/ethernet_interfaces_what_s_in --Bill On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Tim Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll have to check a few of my systems when I arrive home to double check the part number. The chipsets

Re: [pfSense Support] Constant reboots in 1.2-RC4

2008-04-09 Thread Bill Marquette
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Andy Dills [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Chris Buechler wrote: Andy Dills wrote: Good news, it appears my assumption was correct. There exists a flaw in the realtek chipset (as quoted earlier in the thread), and it appears that a