Re: [pfSense Support] PPPoE gets disconnected on WAN port

2008-05-15 Thread Olivier Mueller
Hello, On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 19:08 -0400, Chris Buechler wrote: On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Olivier Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Short update about my issues: Thanks for your feedback (and also to David). I couldn't try the commands yet because the device was remote and

RE: [pfSense Support] Intel Pro 1000 VT

2008-05-15 Thread Adam Costello
I originally thought the problem was that the Intel was not working and the Braodcom was, however with my recent findings have led me to believe neither were working originally :( I've had a look at the supported hardware list for FreeBSD 7 and it doesn't appear in there. I'm quite worried that

[pfSense Support] Multi User Wireless System

2008-05-15 Thread Paul Cockings
Dear list, Subject is a little off topic, but I love pfsense so much I like to use it for everything! Any thoughts gratefully received. Imagine a building that has 8 rooms, each room is rented to a different person. Each person may require internet access via wireless only. 1 access point

Re: [pfSense Support] Multi User Wireless System

2008-05-15 Thread Mogamat Abrahams
I've created a similar system using IPCOP, Traffic control and report addon, Dans Guardian Addon and a load of ugly scripts in the past, but not something I can give to building manager to control. Any thoughts how this might be achieved with Pfsense? Or do you know of any other open

RE: [pfSense Support] Intel Pro 1000 VT

2008-05-15 Thread Sean Cavanaugh
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: support@pfsense.com Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 09:50:17 +0100 Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Intel Pro 1000 VT I originally thought the problem was that the Intel was not working and the Braodcom was, however with my recent findings have led me to believe neither

RE: [pfSense Support] Intel Pro 1000 VT

2008-05-15 Thread Adam Costello
Hi Sean, Sorry didn't put this in the message below, the Braodcom (NetXtreme BCM5722) is actually the embedded NIC so I can't replace :( Is my only option a custom build (if I can find the FreeBSD drivers for it)? Cheers Adam From: Sean Cavanaugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [pfSense Support] Intel Pro 1000 VT

2008-05-15 Thread Dimitri Rodis
Adam, This may sound strange, but you might want to load linux and vmware server on the machine, and run pfSense virtualized until the hardware support comes for your NICs. We run pfSense virtualized on Dell PE1800s, PE2900s, and PE2950 servers all the time. Dimitri Rodis Integrita

Re: [pfSense Support] Intel Pro 1000 VT

2008-05-15 Thread Gary Buckmaster
If that Broadcom card isn't on the supported hardware list for FreeBSD 7, you may be up a creek without a paddle unfortunately. You may try installing straight FreeBSD 7 on this machine and see if it recognizes the cards. That won't help you put pfSense on it, admittedly, but it'll at least

[pfSense Support] Virtualizing pfSense

2008-05-15 Thread Ron Lemon
Good Day All, I would like to take a reasonable machine and run some virtualization software on it so that I can run both pfSense and a copy of a standard workstation image so I can use it for remote testing. The workstation image will not need to run that often but I need to make sure it is

Re: [pfSense Support] Virtualizing pfSense

2008-05-15 Thread Bill Marquette
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Ron Lemon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to take a reasonable machine and run some virtualization software on it so that I can run both pfSense and a copy of a standard workstation image so I can use it for remote testing. The workstation image will

RE: [pfSense Support] Intel Pro 1000 VT

2008-05-15 Thread Sean Cavanaugh
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: support@pfsense.com Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 15:47:09 +0100 Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Intel Pro 1000 VT Hi Sean, Sorry didn’t put this in the message below, the Broadcom (NetXtreme BCM5722) is actually the embedded NIC so I can’t replace :( Is my only option a

RE: [pfSense Support] Virtualizing pfSense

2008-05-15 Thread Sean Cavanaugh
__ Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 12:05:53 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: support@pfsense.com Subject: [pfSense Support] Virtualizing pfSense Good Day All, I would like to take a reasonable machine and run some virtualization software on it so that I can run both pfSense

Re: [pfSense Support] Virtualizing pfSense

2008-05-15 Thread Rainer Duffner
Am 15.05.2008 um 19:24 schrieb Sean Cavanaugh: __ Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 12:05:53 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: support@pfsense.com Subject: [pfSense Support] Virtualizing pfSense Good Day All, I would like to take a reasonable machine and run some

RE: [pfSense Support] Virtualizing pfSense

2008-05-15 Thread Sean Cavanaugh
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 20:47:26 +0200 To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Virtualizing pfSense Am 15.05.2008 um 19:24 schrieb Sean Cavanaugh: __ Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 12:05:53 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [pfSense Support] Virtualizing pfSense

2008-05-15 Thread Rainer Duffner
Am 15.05.2008 um 20:55 schrieb Sean Cavanaugh: for the record, VMWare tools is included in the ports collection Well, the port uses the stuff from the mounted iso-image ;-) You can't download them separately, AFAIK. and they dont really do anything beyond provide a clock sync between

Re: [pfSense Support] Virtualizing pfSense

2008-05-15 Thread Chris Buechler
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Rainer Duffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am 15.05.2008 um 20:55 schrieb Sean Cavanaugh: for the record, VMWare tools is included in the ports collection open-vm-tools from ports is the way to go. I have packages built for pfSense, just need to put together