AW: [pfSense Support] Wanted: Tips for a VLAN capable switch (for home use)

2008-06-12 Thread Fuchs, Martin
get a hp procurve 1800-24g it's passive (without fans) it's about 350 $ regards, Martin Von: Ryan L. Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. Juni 2008 04:33 An: support@pfsense.com Betreff: RE: [pfSense Support] Wanted: Tips for a VLAN capable

Re: [pfSense Support] Wanted: Tips for a VLAN capable switch (for home use)

2008-06-12 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 01:02:54PM +0200, Fuchs, Martin wrote: get a hp procurve 1800-24g it's passive (without fans) it's about 350 $ I second that recommendation -- has been running in an office for a couple months now. Web interface a bit spartanic, but has all the

[pfSense Support] Review New Hardware Setup

2008-06-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We are currently using Sokrisis 5501 with the embedded version of PFsense, they work great, but we are noticing that around 150-200 users the CPU starts maxing out. So we need to build a stronger box, here are the specs an employee came up with. With this box we want to have up to 1,000

RE: [pfSense Support] Review New Hardware Setup

2008-06-12 Thread Ryan Rodrigue
TOTAL: $753.39 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ NOD32 3181 (20080612) Information __ This message was checked by NOD32

Re: [pfSense Support] Review New Hardware Setup

2008-06-12 Thread Curtis LaMasters
I would try one of these. http://www.ironsystems.com/items.asp?Cc=ACLASS 1U's are nice. Curtis LaMasters http://www.curtis-lamasters.com http://www.builtnetworks.com

Re: [pfSense Support] Review New Hardware Setup

2008-06-12 Thread Chris Buechler
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Paul Mansfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: from a previous discussion, Opteron processors are best. Not necessarily at this time. The biggest factor in pps throughput is L1 cache size. AMD procs used to have significantly more L1 cache than Intels and hence were