Tim Nelson wrote:
320MB RAM (2x 128 + 1x 64). The BIOS displays the proper amount of RAM
it's probably not truly contiguous memory due to the different sizes. if
you were desperate you could remove the 64M or swap the simms around,
and hope that the memory map gets fixed, but easier to simply
Hi all,
we're searching for a reliable hardware basis to use as a pfSense
firewall with a maximum concurrent throughput of 6 Gigabits / second.
We were thinking of something like this hardware configuration:
- 2x Intel Xeon QuadCore Processors
- 4 or 8 GB of RAM
- QuadPort Intel Pro 1000
Tim Korves schrieb:
Hi all,
we're searching for a reliable hardware basis to use as a pfSense
firewall with a maximum concurrent throughput of 6 Gigabits / second.
We were thinking of something like this hardware configuration:
- 2x Intel Xeon QuadCore Processors
- 4 or 8 GB of RAM
-
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Kirk Wight [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Is there any way to import or drop in an existing dhcpd.conf to pfSense, to
avoid having to enter dozens of static IP mappings in the GUI? I've tried
simply adding my existing mappings to the pfSense
I put in 3x 128MB DIMMS, all non ECC and things are working properly now. I've
never seen that problem previously though... Odd.
Tim Nelson
Systems/Network Support
Rockbochs Inc.
(218)727-4332 x105
- Paul Mansfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim Nelson wrote:
320MB RAM (2x 128 + 1x 64).
Kirk Wight wrote:
Hello,
Is there any way to import or drop in an existing dhcpd.conf to
pfSense, to avoid having to enter dozens of static IP mappings in the
GUI? I've tried simply adding my existing mappings to the pfSense
/var/dhcpd/etc/dhcpd.conf, but they don't show up in the GUI... does
Hi,
could somebody point me to a document on how I could deploy pfSense with
a load balance/failover config, considering 2 pfsense boxes? I'm not
interested in a dual WAN config, because our backbone already handles
that tranparently (OSPF/BGP). What I would like to have is 2 pfSense
boxes
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 06:52, Tim Korves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we're searching for a reliable hardware basis to use as a pfSense firewall
with a maximum concurrent throughput of 6 Gigabits / second.
Four questions to start:
- If 6Gbps is the peak, what do you expect the sustained throughput
Ah, perfect, thank you - hadn't investigated Backup/Restore yet.
Thanks again.
On Dec 5, 2008, at 10:04 AM, Vick Khera wrote:
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Kirk Wight [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Is there any way to import or drop in an existing dhcpd.conf to
pfSense, to
avoid
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 08:31, rgreiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
could somebody point me to a document on how I could deploy pfSense with
a load balance/failover config, considering 2 pfsense boxes? I'm not
interested in a dual WAN config, because our backbone already handles
that tranparently
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 08:46:54AM -0700, RB wrote:
- 2x Intel Xeon QuadCore Processors
Probably overkill if you aren't proxying, using the portal, or doing
lots of load-balancing/multiwan.
I wonder whether my current SunFire X2100 M2 dual-core 1.8 GHz Opteron
could fill all its onboard NICs
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Tim Korves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
we're searching for a reliable hardware basis to use as a pfSense firewall
with a maximum concurrent throughput of 6 Gigabits / second.
We were thinking of something like this hardware configuration:
- 2x Intel Xeon
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Chris Buechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Commodity PC hardware of any type may not be able to push that. It's
not about Gbps, it's about pps and the kind of traffic you're pushing.
You're going to max out at probably 1 Mpps (million packets per
second). 1 Mpps
the last time I checked out the guts of a Cisco PIX, I found that it was
nothing more than commodity PC hardware with an Intel processor. I
don't know if that's changed, or not. BSD is very good a pushing
packets around and the middle of 11Gbps is 5.5Gbps and that's not far
off the number
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Curtis Maurand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the last time I checked out the guts of a Cisco PIX, I found that it was
nothing more than commodity PC hardware with an Intel processor.
And you aren't going to see a PIX pushing remotely close to 1Mpps.
RB wrote:
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 08:31, rgreiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
could somebody point me to a document on how I could deploy pfSense with
a load balance/failover config, considering 2 pfsense boxes? I'm not
interested in a dual WAN config, because our backbone already handles
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 3:10 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
as i am investigating monitoring solutions at the moment i came up with an
idea, somebody has already implemented:
what about regulary getting the config.xml (not bad as backup as well) and
checking it against a former - good
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 3:10 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
as i am investigating monitoring solutions at the moment i came up with an
idea, somebody has already implemented:
what about regulary getting the config.xml
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Chris Buechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Along those lines - one of the in the future items on the list for
the autoconfigbackup is an option to email when the configuration
changes. For some environments that would be nothing more than an
annoyance, but could be
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 11:31 PM, Bill Marquette
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm guessing it wouldn't take much to have write_config() dump a
message to our standard event logger, which I believe makes use of
syslog. I might poke at that in the next few days now that I think of
it (2.0 only
20 matches
Mail list logo
