At 12:11 AM 1/24/2006, you wrote:
Our new code in head allows a bridge group to receive an ip and will
remedy this.
1.0 is not even out and 1.1 is much more fancy. Go figure ;)
not complaining. i'm just puzzled it works on pfsense on not my
sitch. oh well...
Scott
On 1/23/06, Dan
At 09:58 AM 1/24/2006, you wrote:
Yes, Andrew is investigating this problem. We are seeing some
similar issues as well.
boy that's a relief. i was noticing that when the wifi card was on
my pfsense box and bridging on, ftp proxy broke. possibly other
weird stuff...
with AppleTalk (EtherTalk) packets on a
ath - sis bridge.
Am 24.01.2006 um 16:47 schrieb Dan Swartzendruber:
At 09:58 AM 1/24/2006, you wrote:
Yes, Andrew is investigating this problem. We are seeing some
similar issues as well.
boy that's a relief. i was noticing that when the wifi
At 11:45 AM 1/24/2006, you wrote:
Make sure you're freebsd box is on RELENG_6 and up to date.
it's supposed to be. i've been running cvsup every couple of
weeks. i'll make sure i didn't pooch something. thx!
-
To
At 11:50 AM 1/24/2006, you wrote:
If you where up to date, you would have that sysctl :)
Maybe I misread something. Here is my cvsup tag:
*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6_0
Please tell me this is wrong :)
-
To
At 12:00 PM 1/24/2006, you wrote:
That is wrong. I said RELENG_6
On 1/24/06, Dan Swartzendruber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:50 AM 1/24/2006, you wrote:
If you where up to date, you would have that sysctl :)
Maybe I misread something. Here is my cvsup tag:
*default release=cvs tag
At 12:02 PM 1/24/2006, you wrote:
That is FreeBSD 6 release. That does not include all the new goodies
in -STABLE.
i'm wondering if that explains some of the anomalies i saw. i'll
test tonight after doing a make world and make kernel etc...
At 12:02 PM 1/24/2006, you wrote:
That is FreeBSD 6 release. That does not include all the new goodies
in -STABLE.
that did it! no more loss of connectivity. bless you, my son! :)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
At 06:53 PM 1/24/2006, you wrote:
Scott Ullrich wrote:
That is FreeBSD 6 release. That does not include all the new goodies
in -STABLE.
just wanted to add that this is only advisable if you're doing it
for good reason. in this case, you want -STABLE because of the
relevant changes you
At 04:27 PM 1/23/2006, you wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jan 2006, Scott Ullrich wrote:
One major bug that everyone needs to be aware of is that the shaper
was not subtracting 20% off the upload and download speeds. Anyone
having issues should re-run the Traffic Shaper Wizard and subtract 20%
from their
Pardon the somewhat off-topic post, but I'm at my wits end. I have a
cisco aironet card that was in my pfsense box. I wanted to bridge it
to the LAN, but every time I tried, it would take down the ftp proxy,
so I thought I'd move it to the freebsd 6.0 server. I did
so. Unfortunately,
I got it working, but only by moving the IP address from fxp0 to
bridge0. WTF???
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 07:32 PM 1/23/2006, you wrote:
I've never really tried doing bridging with FreeBSD, but with Linux
that's how bridging is done. For every interface you want to add to
the bridge, you set its IP address to 0.0.0.0. Then, you set the IP
address of the bridge interface and that becomes the
At 01:08 AM 1/22/2006, you wrote:
On 1/22/06, Dan Swartzendruber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well, that did it for me, for sure! it's been so bad lately,i had to
change my asterisk config to not use VOIP at all, since my kids were
saying that no-one they called could understand what they were
At 09:24 AM 1/22/2006, you wrote:
On 1/22/06, Dan Swartzendruber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder how many others are bit by this. Also, can you ellaborate
on you're changes from the wizard for anyone else to try? IE:
changing rules for voips, etc.
All I did was take my real
At 12:08 AM 1/22/2006, you wrote:
On 1/22/06, Ben Browning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just out of curiosity, are those with problems tagging packets for
some VOIP queue based on the IP address of the VOIP device(s)? I
believe I recall an issue in the shaper incorrectly tagging data if a
rule
At 01:49 PM 1/17/2006, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Jan 15, 2006, at 6:44 PM, Chris Buechler wrote:
Jeb Barger wrote:
I've seen this comment a couple of times. Is there a fix allowing
FTP
clients from lan to connect to a server on the internet?
FTP had issues in b1, try B2-BVE3.
At 02:59 PM 1/17/2006, you wrote:
In addition the SoC patches was crashing our build so we backed them out.
Honestly, you're SO picky! :)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
I looked in http://www.pfsense.org/~sullrich/BETA2-BUGVALIDATION5/
but the directory was empty. elsewhere?
At 03:01 PM 1/17/2006, you wrote:
1:1 is fixed in the 5th bug validation edition/beta2.
On 1/17/06, Dan Swartzendruber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 01:49 PM 1/17/2006, Vivek Khera
At 10:03 AM 1/14/2006, you wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:21:37 -0500
Chris Buechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
after you configure them (which appears to be done properly), in the
webgui, go to assign interfaces and assign them to something. Then
you can configure them just like you can your
At 02:51 PM 1/4/2006, you wrote:
So I'm guessing the Sesame Street theme song done in beeps is probably out
of the question then?
Or Barney?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
At 11:47 AM 12/16/2005, Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 12/16/05, Vivek Khera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Intel provides the NIC drivers for FreeBSD. They do not suck. They
work exceptionally well.
I agree. Never have had any issues with Intel nics + freebsd.
Same here. Realtek, on the other hand
At 11:29 PM 12/7/2005, you wrote:
IPSEC cannot be shaped (yet).
yes and no. ESP/AH, no, but if you're doing nat-traversal, that's
encapsulated in UDP packets, so that would work, no?
Scott
On 12/7/05, John Cianfarani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you build the traffic shaping rules for
post your config?
At 10:17 AM 12/3/2005, you wrote:
You might try changing how Outlook sends attachments. winmail.dat
doesn't help most people :)
--Bill
On 12/3/05, DLStrout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hope this gif image is a better rep of what I was trying to convey ...
-Original
At 04:24 AM 11/23/2005, you wrote:
Either your LAN or WAN interface
doesn't support ALTQ. The wizard cannot continue.
Using sis Ethernet cards and vlans on all interfaces. I had thought that
the code was committed to allow vlans with altq.
Look forward to hearing wheather this patch should be
At 02:10 PM 11/23/2005, you wrote:
I've posted this messege in the forum but I not received any responses for 2
days.
I want to setup an always up IPSEC tunnel between two PFSENSE
gateways that have
dynamic IP addresses (cable modem and dsl modem). I know that this
can be easily
done on
At 02:34 PM 11/23/2005, you wrote:
I'm not 100% sure Scott will probably need to jump in here to confirm.
In my tests even though you can put a dynamic-dns name in the field for
remote gateway it doesn't actually seem to do a lookup on it. If it did
it probably would work fine.
This is
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, alan walters wrote:
I was under the impression that altq has support for vlans. Is this
enabled in pfsense at the moment.
Have tried a couple of time but get unsupported interfaces. I know that
my fxp and sis cards support it
So I guess it must be the vlans that are
At 06:04 PM 11/17/2005, you wrote:
Tried on 0.90 through to non released 0.93.2
With the same troubles.
I have vlans on both of the pfsense wan and lan interfaces.
Might try again tomorrow. To see if I can isolate it a bit
Hmm, I remember an issue where the vlans didn't have a bandwidth, so
At 01:16 PM 11/11/2005, you wrote:
Need testers. The sooner I get good feedback, the sooner its relased:
I'll give this a try tonight...
p.s. the traffic shaping is terrific. I downloaded the 0.93 tarball,
maxing out the DSL line, and my daughter was gabbing with her friend
on my
At 10:44 PM 11/11/2005, you wrote:
On 11/11/05, Dan Swartzendruber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 01:16 PM 11/11/2005, you wrote:
Need testers. The sooner I get good feedback, the sooner its relased:
I'll give this a try tonight...
p.s. the traffic shaping is terrific. I downloaded
At 01:31 PM 11/1/2005, you wrote:
Can we please let this thread die already? I'm tired about hearing
of benchmarking the *WRONG* way.
Must. Control. The. Fist. Of. Death.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 03:32 PM 10/31/2005, you wrote:
Just upgraded to 0.90 and traffic shaping seems to be broken.
Even after rerunning the wizard I get:
# pfctl -f /tmp/rules.debug
bandwidth for qWANRoot higher than interface
/tmp/rules.debug:17: errors in queue definition
parent qWANRoot not found for qWANdef
At 03:41 PM 10/31/2005, you wrote:
I'm pretty sure that I am up to date on all MFC's. Did I miss one?
http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/chngview?cn=7245
fixed the problem where the shaper vaporizes the BW settings in the GUI.
-
At 03:46 PM 10/31/2005, you wrote:
Which appears to have been MFC'd at:
http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/chngview?cn=7254
So it sounds like the problem is not fixed entirely?
no, that's different. his errors referred to the BW being higher
than the iface BW, which implies it does know it?
At 03:17 PM 10/28/2005, you wrote:
On 10/28/05, Peter Zaitsev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But the rule will will not be functional with fake IP address - it
typically does not make sense as there are no from/to ips in the
network - fake is not really used anywhere. So why to keep them with
At 03:22 PM 10/28/2005, you wrote:
That is correct as of the recent version that doesn't install
anti-spoof, anti-lockout rules, etc for the lan subnet.
Hmmm, actually, I don't know if it makes a difference, but my
experience was with an OPT interface being bridged to the WAN, not
the LAN.
At 03:27 PM 10/28/2005, you wrote:
On 10/28/05, Dan Swartzendruber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 03:22 PM 10/28/2005, you wrote:
Hmmm, actually, I don't know if it makes a difference, but my
experience was with an OPT interface being bridged to the WAN, not
the LAN. Does that matter
At 02:31 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
Here is my setup:
WRAP
128 mb CF Card
First install 0.864 then upgraded via the web GUI to 0.892 WRAP.
Currently using WAN/LAN only, OPT1 is not doing anything.
This is a home setup using a DSL connection with PPPOE.
All is well until I turn on traffic
At 02:48 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
On 10/26/05, Mojo Jojo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I probably don't but I do testing sometimes with multiple lines back to my
SoftSwitch at the office and don't want to yank it down to 100k or so and
have problems.
Either way the bandwidth here is only
At 02:54 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
Also, I tried lower the guarantee to 256k just in case this part of
the problem.
No joy, same issue..
now *that* is really weird. can you post your rules and queues?
-
To unsubscribe,
At 02:58 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
Sure, what would be the easiest way to do this?
Get a shell on your box and do:
pfctl -sq
pftcl -sr
I have nothing more than I mentioned before.. Plain vanilla setup
with just the shaper stuff I mentioned. I don't even have any
firewall rules or anything
At 03:00 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
I think this is what you want:
- shaper
schedulertypehfsc/schedulertype
- queue
ewww, no thanks. reading raw xml is not fun. as scott said, go to
/tmp and post rules.debug (removing IP addresses etc if you're
worried about security.,,)
this is really odd. no queue stuff at all? what happens if you manually type:
pfctl -f /tmp/rules.debug
any errors?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 03:12 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
Sorry...
I have it turned off at the moment because it kills my connection speed :)
I guess I have to turn it back on so the info will show up in this file?
yes :)
-
To unsubscribe,
At 03:15 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
this is really odd. no queue stuff at all? what happens if you
manually type:
pfctl -f /tmp/rules.debug
any errors?
Try this:
###
# System Aliases
lan = { sis0 }
wan = { ng0 }
pptp = { ng1 ng2 ng3 ng4 ng5 ng6 ng7 ng8 ng9 ng10 ng11 ng12
, Mojo Jojo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry...
I have it turned off at the moment because it kills my connection speed :)
I guess I have to turn it back on so the info will show up in this file?
Todd
- Original Message -
From: Dan Swartzendruber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: support@pfsense.com
Sent
At 03:29 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
try putting manual bandwidth for WAN and LAN in the gui and see if that helps.
You mean under InterfacesWAN and InterfacesLAN?
yes.
Are you sure you get no errors when loading this?
Sorry, when loading what?
what happens if you manually type:
pfctl
At 03:34 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
After setting the LAN interface to 100 mb, the screen came back OK
except I saw this at the very bottom of the screen:
ifconfig: not found Warning: unlink(/var/run/lan.conf.dirty): No
such file or directory in /usr/local/www/interfaces_lan.php on line 283
At 03:37 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
try putting manual bandwidth for WAN and LAN in the gui and see if
that helps.
You mean under InterfacesWAN and InterfacesLAN?
yes.
OK, I set my WAN to 10mb and my LAN to 100mb. I then turned traffic
shaper back on and did a speed test and no joy, same
did you turn shaper back off? please turn it on and add the
following two lines before the queue directives (by editing /tmp/rules.debug)
altq on fxp1 hfsc bandwidth 10Mb queue { qWANRoot }
altq on vlan0 hfsc bandwidth 10Mb queue { qLANRoot }
NOTE: change fxp1 to your wan interface and
also post results of 'pfctl -sq'
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 03:50 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
Yes I turned it back off, I have to leave it off or my speed is miserable :)
i understand your pain, but no test results with shaping off will be
meaningful.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
At 03:54 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
Here is the file after turning shaping back on and before making the
changes you requested.
Working on the changes now.
Todd
-
# System Aliases
lan = { sis0 }
wan = { ng0 }
pptp = { ng1 ng2 ng3 ng4 ng5 ng6 ng7 ng8 ng9 ng10 ng11 ng12 ng13
At 03:56 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
After turning the shaper back on, I do have this already in the file:
altq on sis1 hfsc bandwidth 10Mb queue { qWANRoot }
altq on sis0 hfsc bandwidth 100Mb queue { qLANRoot }
Do you want me to still replace this with yours? Seems to be the
same basically..
At 04:01 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
hmmm, this should have read:
altq on ng0 hfsc bandwidth 10Mb queue { qWANRoot }
Should I change it and give it a whirl?
yes, please.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
At 04:12 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
queue root_sis1 bandwidth 10Mb priority 0 {qWANRoot}
are you sure you reloaded the rules after changing sis1 to ng0?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
At 04:51 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
OK, I did it and my link is still hosed.
Do you want me to run any of those commands again or anything else
now that I have reloaded the rules?
yes, please send 'pfctl -sq' now that you reloaded 'em.
At 05:07 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
Hmmm...
Since I turned shaper back off.. I had to turn it back on, I noticed
that my changes to /tmp/rules.debug had gone away so I put the ng0
back on the line where it belongs.
After doing so, I ran:
# pfctl -f /tmp/rules.debug
pfctl: ng0: driver does
At 12:45 AM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
Not likely. This should be a ticket. If someone can open a ticket I
can look at easily unsetting the shaper at the end of the wizard of no
options where checked.
done.
-
To
At 05:05 PM 10/24/2005, you wrote:
Ryan Neily wrote:
I'm still seing problems with both SSH clients I am using. On one,
I get a repated login attempt. With SecureCRT on Windows I get a
Unknown Authentication Method unless I check the box that says
keyboard interactive only??? I am not
I was looking over the bridging example posted earlier, but it wasn't
quite what I was wondering about. Is it possible to bridge an OPT
interface to the WAN interface even though the WAN interface is in a
totally different subnet than the hosts on the OPT interface? My situation:
home DSL
At 11:13 AM 10/10/2005, you wrote:
As of 0.86.4 there should be a automatic ftp helper that is launched
for internet - lan ftp redirections. Make sure you're on the latest
version.
Hmmm, I'm on 0.86.4 now, and it doesn't work for me. I went to an
external linux server and ftp'ed back in to
At 11:46 AM 10/10/2005, you wrote:
Oh sorry I didn't read this very well. I'm guessing the problem has to
do with the ftp proxy (pftpx) saying the data channel is on 10.0.0.2.
227 Entering Passive Mode (10,0,0,2,191,87) - 10,0,0,2
ah, yeah, i didn't notice that either. not enough coffee, i
At 12:44 PM 10/10/2005, you wrote:
This is what the man page says for the -f switch.
-f address
Fixed server address. The proxy will always connect to the
same
server, regardless of where the client wanted to connect to
(before it was redirected). Use
At 04:38 PM 10/10/2005, you wrote:
Well I'm not sure to tell you the truth. I wonder if binding it to the
inet facing ip would fix it. The only this is this would remove the need
for nat as you would have the proxy handle all the hand offs. :/
Try this. Kill pftpx (only the one with the -c 21
At 05:04 PM 10/10/2005, you wrote:
File a ticket on cvstrac and I will change the behavior to start the
ftp helper using:
/usr/local/sbin/pftpx -b $inet-address -c 21 -f 10.0.0.2 -g 21
Roger. Thx!
-
To unsubscribe,
Just logged into my pfsense and was surprised to see memory usage of
82% (given that I'm not doing much right now.) Ran top and saw this:
Mem: 56M Active, 102M Inact, 42M Wired, 20K Cache, 34M Buf, 42M Free
Swap: 512M Total, 512M Free
Not sure how the memory usage is derived, but on a BSD
allowable protocol can be tcp/udp, and it add separate rules for tcp
and udp. cool. unfortunately, you then have to add one manually for
icmp assuming one wants to be able to ping outside hosts. how about
tcp/udp/icmp also/instead?
At 10:49 AM 10/7/2005, you wrote:
On 10/7/05, Dan Swartzendruber
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
allowable protocol can be tcp/udp, and it add separate rules for
tcp
and udp. cool. unfortunately, you then have to add one
manually for
icmp assuming one wants to be able to ping outside
hosts. how
menu
On 10/7/05, Dan Swartzendruber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
p.s. the reason i bumped into this was looking at my ntop data, i
noticed a
small amount of non-IP data going out the WAN port. no idea what - i
have a
windows box (XP) but it should be doing NETBIOS over TCP (or whatever
the
option
At 12:57 PM 10/7/2005, you wrote:
This code is leftover from m0n0wall. Not sure if its accurate since
we now factor swap into the equation.
At any rate, here is the code in question:
exec(/sbin/sysctl -n vm.stats.vm.v_active_count
vm.stats.vm.v_inactive_count .
just installed the latest package (since michael has provided a bunch
of changes.) works fine, except for one glitch: the installation
script apparently thinks the cache is /usr/local/squid/cache, but
squid expects it in /var/squid, so it pukes. I created that
directory manually and
At 12:53 AM 10/2/2005, you wrote:
Mac address override?
my guess. some of them register a mac address. others want a
specific client name. never used RR so i can't say...
Scott
On 10/1/05, Dan Swartzendruber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 09:17 PM 10/1/2005, you wrote
At 05:56 AM 10/2/2005, you wrote:
On 10/2/05, Dan Swartzendruber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well, your WAN didn't get an IP address (note it's all zeroes?) Does RR
require any kind of account information for the dhcp client? Some cable
ISPs do, some don't...
Well what i think
At 10:07 AM 10/2/2005, you wrote:
I
finally got it to work! I had to recycle the modem for a min and then
release the IP and renewed it and the WAN IP showed up on WAN interface.
glad to hear it. i guess it was just a glitch...
thanks, scott, that did it :)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 03:15 AM 9/30/2005, you wrote:
[alan walters] [alan walters]
Just looking at this I can only tag to a specific vlan on each port.
So port to is enabled for 802.11q on vlan 1-4 with vlan 1 as the tag but
it allows untagged traffic to transit.
Other ports have only onevlan on then and they are
At 05:28 AM 9/29/2005, you wrote:
This might be off
topic but I am flummoxed by the problem so I thought I would ask.
Configuration
Pfsense
Lan with 3 vlans and lan as parent.
Switch with vlan 1 through to 4 enabled
Port 2 is setup on switch with all vlans and is plugged into lan on
At 10:27 AM 9/29/2005, you wrote:
Is the switch port configured for tagging, or
did you configure it to allow vlans 1-4 to talk
to port 2? The VLAN setup in pfSense utilises
802.1q tagging, enabling vlans on a port doesn't
necessarily configure that port for tagged
frames. --Bill On
At 01:12 PM 9/29/2005, you wrote:
Well - it keeps timing out, I wish I had the machine in front of me so I
could send the actual error - but it keeps saying that the microcoad load
is timing out
sounds like the nic is flaky. i'm running the same NIC on my pfsense
(as the LAN) and it works
At 11:56 PM 9/26/2005, you wrote:
This file was introduced after 0.85.2. Are you sure you didn't update
filter.inc ?
i probably did. i think i was trying to pick up a bugfix. probably
not a good idea.
-
To
At 09:28 AM 9/27/2005, you wrote:
Probably not when certain people split a dozen or so functions out
into their own file :) 0.85.4 has all the latest fixes. At this
time, there isn't much patched post 0.85.4 (unless you try running
ipv6 tunneling :)), I'd recommend moving to it.
already did,
At 04:12 PM 9/24/2005, you wrote:
Dan Swartzendruber wrote:
At 09:07 PM 9/23/2005, you wrote:
Oh, I understood you.
In that case, I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. This
platform deliberately has the capability of running various
services on it (unlike m0n0wall.) If someone has
It seems to me that if someone is going to port clamav as a package,
please make sure that clamd can be run as a TCP
daemon. Since clamav would need to be running for any kind of squid
proxy to scan incoming pages, it could just as easily be available to
someone running a mail server
At 08:40 AM 9/13/2005, Frimmel, Ivan \(ISS South Africa\) wrote:
My
routers have been up for sometime before 0.84 and after .. du h
gives ~3Mb on both. No VMware.
i'm running vanilla 0.84 and i get:
# du -h /rescue/
2.8M /rescue/
At 11:44 AM 9/13/2005, John Cianfarani wrote:
On my none vmware system I have it running on it looks to do the same thing.
# df -h
Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a3.9G433M3.1G12%/
devfs 1.0K1.0K 0B 100%/dev
# du -h
arpwatch still not quite right.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A couple of times I've inadvertantly sent to pfsense.org instead of
pfsense.com, and gotten the following bounce:
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mail.livebsd.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up.
At 03:27 PM 9/6/2005, Richard Davis wrote:
This is probably a newbie question but I have loaded pfsense on the hard
drive on PC A and have a cross over cable going to another PC(PC B).
I configured the PC B with an IP in the same range(192.168.1.10\24
.the default on the pfsense box is
Running latest 80.4. Part of my problem was a basic
misunderstanding. I had assumed that the portal would block access
until you authenticated, so I left the default OPT1 = Any rule in I
had before. So... I removed it and now access is not allowed until I
go through the portal page.
At 07:23 PM 8/26/2005, Chris Buechler wrote:
On 8/26/05, Dan Swartzendruber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running latest 80.4. Part of my problem was a basic
misunderstanding. I had assumed that the portal would block access
until you authenticated, so I left the default OPT1 = Any rule in I
I don't know if this is something I'm doing wrong. Using the default
pfsense captive portal page, I defined a test user and
password. Unfortunately, even if I deliberately enter something
wrong, I get no error indication, and my browser goes to the URL I
requested. I do happen to be
At 09:20 PM 8/25/2005, Dimitri Rodis wrote:
Does this issue
still exist in the latest build of pfSense?
Better explanation:
http://www.m0n0.ch/wall/docbook/faq-lannat.html
I *hate* the split horizon or split
brain DNS solution. It is an absolute nightmare to do this stuf in
DNS. Please tell
Almost forgot: what it is now doing is when I enter the webGUI, it
keeps bringing up the wizard. I can skip it, but next time it comes
up again...
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
I was looking at the setup screen, and it doesn't look like it will
let me pick the OPT1 interface (which is where my guest WLAN will
come in on...)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
At 07:10 PM 8/24/2005, Scott Ullrich wrote:
The interface must be enabled and configured to show up.
Aha, thanks. I was before, but I got bit by that bug you just fixed
in the vlan checking code. Haven't pulled down 0.80 yet. Thx...
Scott
On 8/24/05, Dan Swartzendruber [EMAIL
Currently you can only specify an IP address for entries. Some
clients (such as my belkin network KVM) don't pass a client
name. Others (such as my Series 2 TiVo) pass a less than useful one
(in this case, the serial number.) Is there some reason this field
couldn't take a name? Maybe
98 matches
Mail list logo
