On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Arquivos arqui...@otv.com.br wrote:
i need to forward all the requests going out by the port 53 (DNS) to a
single external DNS server, in dispite off the DNS configured in the
clients. Can someone help me in that?
What you want is a NAT Port Forward entry on
I'm trying to build a dialup router on an HP t5710. It has 512 MB of
flash and a single serial port, which I intend to use for an external
modem. I'm wondering if a generic install of 1.2.3 or 2.0 will fit on
the 512 MB of flash, or can I do an embedded install and disable the
console so that the
Happy Birthday, eh. (Canadian)
db
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Chris Buechler cbuech...@gmail.com wrote:
http://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/1107
Fixing that broke PPPoE entirely on AMD64, doubt if that gets fixed for 2.0.
Can you please clarify? Are you saying that folks who use PPPoE on the
WAN should not update to the
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Nenhum_de_Nos math...@eternamente.info wrote:
ps: how ofter do nanobsd images are updated ? there is just this from July
4th and no more available.
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,38687.0.html
db
2.0-RC3 (amd64)
built on Tue Jul 12 21:23:55 EDT 2011
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:52 PM, David Burgess apt@gmail.com wrote:
I hope that's not too confusing. To summarize, any two machines, real
or virtual, get iperf results near wire speed when on the same L2
network. Any two machines
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Adam Thompson athom...@athompso.net wrote:
Are you passing the VLAN tags all the way into the pfSense VM on a single
vNIC, or are you splitting the VLANs at the vSwitch level and passing them
into multiple vNICs on the pfSense VM?
Adam,
Thanks for the info.
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 4:39 AM, Ermal Luçi ermal.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Try to tune these sysctl:
net.isr.numthreads: 1
net.isr.bindthreads: 0
net.isr.direct: 1
net.isr.direct_force: 1
I tried those in System: Advanced: System Tunables. Throughput is
still 17.4 Mbps between vlan240 and any
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:52 PM, David Burgess apt@gmail.com wrote:
I'll probably kick myself when I figure this one out
And the answer is...
traffic shaper. I'm so embarrassed. ::Off to kick self::
db
-
To unsubscribe
I'll probably kick myself when I figure this one out, but here's a
riddle for you.
pfsense is 2.0RC3. Atom D510 (2x1.6GHz, GBE)
Clear DF bit: enabled
Scrub: disabled
I have a number of real and virtual hosts (single ESXi server with
vlans) connected to pfsense through a Netgear gigabit switch
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Volker Kuhlmann hid...@paradise.net.nz wrote:
Well, this is a little annoying. I have RC1 too, and I had checked only
about a week ago, and there is no newer than RC1 on the servers
The images are labelled RC1, but if you install them they will show up
in your
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Steven Sherwood stev...@coc.ca wrote:
Hi there - I assume that you are using multiple modems? Should be possible
to create VLANs and have multiple PPPoE sessions, one on each VLAN. You will
need a VLAN capable switch upstream of you pfSense box for
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Roberto Nunnari
roberto.nunn...@supsi.ch wrote:
Hi.
I just discovered that modifications to the firewall rules will not be
active until the box is rebooted..
Is it a known bug or a misconfiguration on my side?
Did you try this?
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Andreas Kaiser di...@binary-punks.com wrote:
That allows you to do any routing you want between interfaces / WAN and
gives you granular control of everything.
*That* is exactly what I want ;-)
Have you turned off automatic outbound NAT and disabled or
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 1:51 AM, A Mohan Rao mohanra...@gmail.com wrote:
not able to do client side open vpn setup properly any body can help for
which open vpn client i have to download and install run properly i have to
do server side setup which is i have to attached video.
Awaiting for
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Yehuda Katz yeh...@ymkatz.net wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Mehma Sarja mehmasa...@gmail.com wrote:
Alix running pf 20 RC1 nano. Trying to change from default 192.168.1.x
network to 192.168.100.x on the LAN interface - nothing fancy.
WHAT I DID
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Shibashish shi...@gmail.com wrote:
My pfSense box says
real memory = 12884901888 (12288 MB)
avail memory = 2567946240 (2448 MB)
How can i ask pfSense to use more memory?
Use the 64-bit version.
I tried the 64-bit version
but it kept crashing, hence
Was down briefly here, but up now.
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:25 PM, - Dickie Bradford -
dbradf...@never-enuff.net wrote:
Is it possible to do backup on a 1.2.3 machine and reload it with a fresh2.0
and reload the backup?
Yes. The only issues I've seen come up in the forum are from users who
have international characters in the
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Luke Jaeger ad...@pvpa.org wrote:
Hello,
I have squid configured as transparent proxy on my network.
The point of transparent proxy is that it doesn't require any system
or browser proxy setting; it intercepts all http requests from the
user on the active
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 12:10 AM, Chris Buechler cbuech...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 2:02 AM, David Burgess apt@gmail.com wrote:
But openconnect works, at least for me on Linux, and from what I
gather it's available for FreeBSD too. What are the chances of
installing
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 3:49 PM, k_o_l k_...@hotmail.com wrote:
Since I installed 2.0-RC1 last Friday I’ve noticed RRD at least on two
different occasion stopped collecting data see attached.
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,33154.0.html
db
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Yehuda Katz yeh...@ymkatz.net wrote:
Does anyone else see why this is annoying?
I lost all understanding of this thread many posts back.
db
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Seth Mos seth@dds.nl wrote:
The current 2.0 snapshots have a different driver for the Intel gigabit
cards. We switched to the Yandex drivers to debug driver issues with the
Intel supplied ones.
I wondered. The difference on this system is positive and
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org wrote:
Since the switch to the Yandex Intel drivers a couple days ago my VMs
all constantly print watchdog timeouts on the console... It seems to
operate OK, but it makes the console useless.
I, for one, welcome our new
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Eric Feldhusen
efeldhusen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
As part of a regional education service agency to multiple K-12 school
districts, we're talking about using pfSense for our nat/firewalling for
approximately 5000+ workstations on a 30-40 Mbps internet uplink.
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 10:12 AM, David Burgess apt@gmail.com wrote:
If
you want to spend a little more for that 'instant' feel, I can tell
you that a Core i3 550 on the same connection feels pretty much
instant
To clarify, I was referring to navigating the UI. All of the hardware
I
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Kevin Tollison ktolli...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for the top post. (BlackBerry)
I worked with Scott and Ermal a while today on an em issue. Ermal was able to
improve the situation some, but it is still not resolved. I had to bail on
him.
Is anyone
On 2011 3 4 20:09, Kevin Tollison ktolli...@gmail.com wrote:
2 B5 was good until a month or so ago. Are you using any vlans? I am
beginning to think it may be in vlans.
Yes. One of my onboards has 8 vlans and the other 5.
Client.
Sent from my phone.
On 2011 3 4 20:14, Kevin Tollison ktolli...@gmail.com wrote:
What about openVPN?
--
Kevin Tollison
Sent from my Blackberry
-Original Message-
From: David Burgess apt@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 20:12:21
To: support@pfsense.com
Reply
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Kevin Tollison ktolli...@gmail.com wrote:
That kills my theories. Must still be driver or kernel. Wonder if one of the
panic fixes caused the issue I am seeing. Ermal did some voodoo that I
didn't understand today. Worked better, but not completely fixed. Glad to
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 11:21 PM, David Burgess apt@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 2:44 AM, David Burgess apt@gmail.com wrote:
the NIC is sending and receiving a total of about 530
mbit x2 during the test.
This gets worse I'm afraid.
Well, some good news. I have reinstalled
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 2:44 AM, David Burgess apt@gmail.com wrote:
the NIC is sending and receiving a total of about 530
mbit x2 during the test.
This gets worse I'm afraid.
I recreated my setup, substituting a GS724T switch in for the GS108E,
hoping the switch might be the bottleneck
2.0-RC1 (amd64)
built on Tue Mar 1 15:52:28 EST 2011
Core i3 550 3.2 GHz
4GB RAM
Intel GBE
I've just set this system up doing some crude throughput testing with
iperf. The most I can push through this box from LAN to WAN is a
steady 503-520 mbps, using the default mtu (higher mtu values produce
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 12:38 AM, Seth Mos seth@dds.nl wrote:
I'm routing it from one interface to another although it's destination is
also a VLAN on that other interface. Maybe that's where the issue lies.
It would be unfortunate if vlan-vlan traffic on a given interface has
its maximum
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Shali K.R. sh...@vidyaacademy.ac.in wrote:
Dear all,
I am having 500 windows client machines connected through pfSense and squid,
please suggest me a suitable method for handling updates.
You'll find the appropriate info here:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Shali K.R. sh...@vidyaacademy.ac.in wrote:
Dear db,
i have tried this, but it showing a high bandwidth usage, is this a proper
way??
I uninstalled the squid package about three months ago, unable to get
it to function properly. I will try it again when pfsense
The 2.0 snapshots include a usb image. Installing 1.2.3 from usb will be a
bit of a trick, as you have learned.
db
An article popped up on /. today, and although it's a poorly written
article, some of the ensuing discussion did provoke some thought.
http://it.slashdot.org/story/11/02/01/181200/Firewalls-Make-DDoS-Attacks-Worse
I think the article is mostly just scare marketing, but it raises the
question of
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:25 PM, David Burgess apt@gmail.com wrote:
I recently read a page in the pfsense docs (can't find it in the wiki or
FAQ now), which I believe quoted the pfsense book (don't have it),
where cmb states that pfsense is the best open source firewall, and
one
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Dimitri Rodis
dimit...@integritasystems.com wrote:
pfSense 2.0, most recent builds
When I go to status/traffic graph, the graph is correct but the list of
hosts is not. I don’t know if there’s something I’m not doing, but here’s
what I did to test it:
Put
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Dimitri Rodis
dimit...@integritasystems.com wrote:
After an upgrade to this morning’s snap, I received the following after the
upgrade/reboot (it’s what’s on my PuTTY atm):
This looks a lot like what's being discussed here, although I don't
see the em driver
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Shali K.R. sh...@vidyaacademy.ac.in wrote:
sir ..
In my pfsense traffic graphic shows WAN in 4 Mbps LAN out 1Mbps Why this
differenceanything wrong with mypfsense?
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,31855.0.html
For pcap use tcpdump on the pfsense
I'm familiar with the hardware sizing guide, and I've done a few
benchmarks myself, but I'm wondering if a MHz is a MHz when it comes
to pf performance, or do things like IPC and cache sizes matter? What
about RAM frequencies and latency?
Putting encryption and the various pfsense packages aside,
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Bruce B bruceb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I am facing a dilemma here. If I port forward 1-2 to my first
Asterisk server which sets behind pfSense v1.2.3 then I have two way audio.
If I remove it I don't have any audio but call establishes.
Now,
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Charles N Wyble
char...@knownelement.com wrote:
Phase one applies the configuration.
Phase two rolls it back if you don't confirm it. So if you did something
that blocked you out of the device for example, it would auto roll back.
Ubiquiti's AirOS 5 has a
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Shali K.R. sh...@vidyaacademy.ac.in wrote:
Dear all,
I have 2 WAN ( Static and another PPPOE )connections and a LAN connection
i added PPPOE as WAN and static as OPT1 two connections are active and i
added a firewall rule for OPT1 allow all to all then i
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Shali K.R. sh...@vidyaacademy.ac.in wrote:
Dear sir,
How can i create rule for out going? i already created all allow rule for
OPT1 in firewal- Rules
When you create a firewall rule on an interface, that rule will govern
only packets arriving on that
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Dimitri Rodis
dimit...@integritasystems.com wrote:
if that
doesn’t work, you can use the gui to boot off of the old slice. Very nice
and easy.
Or if it /really/ doesn't work you can use the initial boot menu to
choose the other slice at boot time. You will see
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Bruce B bruceb...@gmail.com wrote:
So, if I am on:
1 pfsense
and do an upgrade, does the upgrade apply to 1 pfsense or 2 pfsense ?
If you booted from 1 then upgraded, it will overwrite the 2 slice.
Also, rather using the Console Cable each time, can I change
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 10:58 AM, David Burgess apt@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to download a large iso from microsoft.com. At some point
(different every time), the download stalls on the client.
Sorry, forgot to mention what I'm using.
2.0-BETA5 (amd64)
built on Tue Jan 4 02:47:18 EST
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Nicolas Roussi
nicolas.rou...@archimedean.org wrote:
Would this setup be sufficient?
Depends on the bandwidth limits you will put on your clients. I have
2.0 with squid running on an Atom D510 with 4GB RAM and a 40/4 mbps
mlppp connection and it has no trouble.
I'm annoyed by the recurrence of posts like this:
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r25224935-
I see the Linux myth is debunked in the FAQ, but is there something
substantial that I can link to that states or demonstrates that
pfsense is adequately administered from the UI for most non-dev users?
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko evg.yu...@rogers.com wrote:
Or if you can answer more generally what is genereal pfSense set up if you
get DSL line from ISP?
I'm not familiar with that Netgear or PPPoA. My DSL uses PPPoE, and I
have two options for handling that login:
1.
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Scott Benson sben...@a-1networks.com wrote:
[r...@host]/conf(17): mkdir blah
mkdir: blah: Read-only file system
[1.2.3-RELEASE]
[r...@host]/conf(18):
/etc/rc.conf_mount_rw
db
-
To
Is there any public plan for a 2.0 book? I sure would like to pick one up.
db
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
Commercial support available -
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:38 PM, David Burgess apt@gmail.com wrote:
Can somebody please tell me the cisco equivalent of a firewall rule
that will keep state?
After some closer inspection I don`t think there is a Cisco firewall
on site at all, just a router and layer 3 switching. I talked
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 9:33 AM, k_o_l k_...@hotmail.com wrote:
“There has been an error creating the graphs, please check
your system logs”
I would like to keep my RRD data is there a work around?
This has been discussed in the forum, and IIRC, the only solution that
was offered was to delete
Can somebody please tell me the cisco equivalent of a firewall rule
that will keep state? I have hosts (Windows and pfSense) on opposite
sides of a cisco firewall and router which I don't control. When I try
to reach pfSense from Windows, tcpdump shows that pfSense is receiving
the packet and
My WAN is mlppp with a static public IP address. pfSense is 2.0 beta4.
Out of curiosity I disabled the check box on the WAN config page to
block private networks. I then created an alias for RFC1918 and
loopback addresses and manually created a logging reject rule at the
top of the WAN rules for
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko evg.yu...@rogers.com wrote:
I would suggest to tcpdump. This way you for sure will know where these
packets are coming from.
Thanks for the hint. tcpdump confirms that these are coming from
pppoe0, so I'll be talking to my ISP.
db
Is there a way to connect pfsense with an Anyconnect server? Google
isn't turning up much for me.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
Commercial
pfsense is setup like this:
pfsense--WAN (public IP x)
--OPT1 (public IP y/30)
Connected to OPT1 is client's cisco firewall which is NATing for a
172.21.50/23 subnet. Their dhcp is handing out pfsense's OPT1 address
as DNS server, and pfsense is running DNS forwarder. This works well,
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Cyril Jaquier cyril.jaqu...@jaqpot.net wrote:
I searched the pfsense forum and found someone with
a similar issue. ermal suggested to disable the shaper on the wireless
interface. This seems to fix the problem for me.
Is this a known bug? Any better
On 2010-11-19 9:56 AM, Richard Amerman fi...@7technw.com wrote:
I do this all the time and using a separate nic is simpler and easier to
manage than an alias. Unless I am missing something, a vlan for this case
is
overkill.
I discussed this with the m0n0wall list back in '07 where cmb and
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Fred Boiteux fblis...@free.fr wrote:
The different LAN subnets' trafic aren't VLAN tagged, and all traffic
comes from one Ethernet port (from the nearest antenna), so I don't
understand how VLAN could be used there ?
Most carrier-grade radios support tagging
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Adam Thompson athom...@athompso.net wrote:
I think the OP was referring to running two subnets concurrently on the
same wire, something I often have to do for various reasons, sometimes to
solve co-existence issues while renumbering a network. I have no idea
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:51 PM, fi...@7technw.com fi...@7technw.com wrote:
Another easy solution is to just add another nic.
Not an option in this case. The OP described a wireless network where
the client subnet and management subnet exist on the same physical
network. You can't change that in
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Neonicacid neonica...@gmail.com wrote:
My main issue with how it is set up right now is that File and Printer
Sharing does not jump across the subnets, so none of the computers can
communicate.
Does anyone have any advice or solutions for this problem?
If
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Neonicacid neonica...@gmail.com wrote:
David,
I don't have a single switch big enough to support all of the devices that I
currently have on the network. The routers help with that by providing extra
ports to connect devices with.
So the simplest way to
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Gerald Waugh
gwa...@frontstreetnetworks.com wrote:
We use bridging as the pfsense machine firewalls servers with public IP
addresses. Clues on how to accomplish with routing appreciated.
You have a public subnet from your ISP, 1.1.1.0/24, for example.
You get
After some contemplation I think I would like to run squid on my
pfsense box, but mount the squid cache directory (/var/squid) on an
external host. After some research, I believe the following options
would provide the best performance with the least overhead, in
descending order:
1. AoE
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Nathan Eisenberg
nat...@atlasnetworks.us wrote:
iSCSI is relatively excellent - and as a block device, has great performance.
I've had less than pleasing results with AOE in several different use-cases.
If you want to share the cache across multiple
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Adam Thompson athom...@c3a.ca wrote:
If you want to take advantage of Linux' TRIM support, you should be
using NFS. TRIM support (AFAIK) requires underlying knowledge of the
filesystem or at least the block allocation... iSCSI hides all of those
details, as
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 9:09 AM, James Bensley jwbens...@gmail.com wrote:
can the pfSense box handle incoming balancing this
way as well as out going?
Incoming load balancing in pfsense is different from outgoing load
balancing. It allows you to have more than one server on your internal
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 6:53 AM, James Bensley jwbens...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Everybody :)
I would like to use the LAGG to bond multiple ADSL lines for a faster,
more reliable internet access (using LACP).
LAGG acts by bonding multiple interfaces at layer 2. You're trying to
bond a pair of
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 9:33 AM, James Bensley jwbens...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks guys for your responses, I will look into MLPPP but in the mean
time, with regards to load balancing; Again, how does this work in
pfSense?
For 1.2:
http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/MultiWanVersion1.2
For 2.0:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Christian Borchert ccb...@gmail.com wrote:
I have tried this network card in another machine (HP Core 2 Quad) and it
works perfectly under the same test conditions.
I have limited experience with Dell servers, but I have found some of
their newer laptops
Why is it that when I browse the list archives for this month (gmane
and marc), I only see 2 threads? Specifically I'm looking for a link
to the ongoing discussion started by Luke Jaeger on script-heavy
sites, and I don't see it there. Likewise, when I search the archive
for his name I get no
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Yehuda Katz yeh...@ymkatz.net wrote:
I just installed 2.0-BETA4, logged in as admin, and created a new user.
I have not been able to find a logout link so I can try using that user.
Is it there and I just don't see it or is it really not there?
- Yehuda
Under
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:46 AM, belkhiria aymen
belkhiria.ay...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I need to configure siproxd as Sip proxy for external users.
I don't think siproxd is designed for this, nor is it necessary.
db
-
To
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Chris Flugstad ch...@cascadelink.com wrote:
-how to i break up the large block into smaller blocks
Like this?
http://www.vlsm-calc.net/
db
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Chris Flugstad ch...@cascadelink.com wrote:
wan rules
proto source port dest
port gw
block * 216.127.61.72 * *
* *
lan rules
block *
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Chris Flugstad ch...@cascadelink.com wrote:
I did what i needed to do for the time being though. much appreciated.
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is what we call poaching the solution ;)
If this list ran on a points system I would get a flogging now.
db
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Ron Lemon r...@maplewood.com wrote:
Action: Pass
Interface: LAN
Protocol: any (I assume this also include ICMP???)
Source: Single Host (10.0.1.100)
Destination: Network (10.0.0.0 / 24)
Gateway: default
To me this means that 10.0.1.100 can talk to any
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 2:45 AM, Michel Servaes mic...@mcmc.be wrote:
Thanks for the explaining - don't know if this dane-elec has
wear-levelling though (I'd suspect they would mention this, if it was)
My understanding with SSDs (no idea if CFs are the same way) is that
wear-levelling works
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Michel Servaes mic...@mcmc.be wrote:
I am a bit worried about the fact that the CF card should be set read-only.
If I may paraphrase Bob, I thought he was meaning that because/if you
are using the embedded version, the problem you describe must be due
to some
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Bob Gustafson bob...@rcn.com wrote:
I don't know the significance of 'embedded' in the context of CF cards.
Sorry, I meant to say I was paraphrasing Beat, not Bob. The pfsense
embedded version, which is recommended for CF installs, mounts the
filesystem read-only,
So will this benefit the FreeBSD crowd any time soon?
http://www.osnews.com/story/23786/BREAKING_BROADCOM_OPEN_SOURCES_WIRELESS_DRIVERS
db
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands,
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Tonix (Antonio Nati)
to...@interazioni.it wrote:
Thanks... I see no dates at all.
About 2.0, I see no documentation around. Is there a list where to ask for
2.0 features explained?
Generally speaking, the forum is where most discussion around 2.0
happens,
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Michel Servaes mic...@mcmc.be wrote:
What happens, if you transfer the file in direct (eg. without the
pfsense in between ?)
Definitely try that.
pfsense has a workaround specifically for NFS on System: Advanced:
Firewall and NAT (system_advanced_firewall.php).
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Bradley D. Thornton
brad...@northtech.us wrote:
I thought there was about a 2GByte file size limit on Ext2 File systems too.
Not according to wikipedia, however There are also many userspace
programs that can't handle files larger than 2 GB.
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 3:58 AM, bsd b...@todoo.biz wrote:
Hi,
I am looking for a tool (or a configuration setup) that will allow me to
benchmark (performance test) couple of firewall based on pfSense, and
eventualy to compare them with other software / hard solution.
Any idea, clue, link
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 11:17 AM, stephen at stephenjc
step...@stephenjc.com wrote:
Supermicro twin is like that but they share a ps.
I was going to suggest that it wouldn't be hard to modify a SM twin to
use dual independent PicoPSU or M4-ATX or the like, but it appears the
twins are all Xeon
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Dane Reugger d...@downtownpc.com wrote:
I'm a long time fan of PfSense but several concepts elude me ... so I
was hopping somebody had a VoIP QoS for PfSense how-to they could
point me at.
The single most important aspect of a working QoS solution is to make
I'm using a pair of onboard (vr) NICs on a net5501-80 (500 MHz Geode)
with vlans to firewall a 36/4 mlppp connection. During heavy download
top reports interrupts around 40-50% CPU usage with most of the
remainder being idle.
I dropped in an Intel Pro 1000 GT (em, PCI) in place of one of the
Sorry, forgot to mention 2.0 nanobsd August 2 snapshot.
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:20 AM, David Burgess apt@gmail.com wrote:
I'm using a pair of onboard (vr) NICs on a net5501-80 (500 MHz Geode)
with vlans to firewall a 36/4 mlppp connection. During heavy download
top reports interrupts
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Dominic dominic@gmail.com wrote:
My query though is, how can I test that this is working correctly? Is
there a tool that I can
use to make connections from a single machine? Ideally something that
provides the
Would this do it?
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 8:28 AM, David Burgess apt@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Dominic dominic@gmail.com wrote:
My query though is, how can I test that this is working correctly? Is
there a tool that I can
use to make connections from a single machine? Ideally
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Scott Ullrich sullr...@gmail.com wrote:
That is a good question. The 2.0 installer uses pc-sysinstaller
which I am not entirely sure if it takes into account this or not.
I did an install yesterday and worked on this. I manually changed
geometry to 32 heads
1 - 100 of 221 matches
Mail list logo
