2011/7/13 Jim Pingle li...@pingle.orgmailto:li...@pingle.org
On 7/9/2011 9:17 PM, Dimitri Rodis wrote:
The system is and has been set to -8 (I am Pacific Daylight Time, USA), and
hasn't been re/booted since the first boot on that build--and I have
reported this issue back in RC1 and it still
, but
notice how there are some entries that are in the middle of this screenshot
that are newer than everything else. (The problem is that Jul 8 15:12:29 has
not yet happened in my time zone, it is only shortly after 10AM here..)
[cid:image001.png@01CC3D56.B846EF00]
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita
for
debugging/troubleshooting purposes if someone needs it since I have a spare
unit that I can boot the CF on..
Thanks,
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
don't think the support for 8139C+ will ever be 100% (I'd take 99%)
until this happens.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
, or X2500) that is what it's going to take to fix the Realtek
driver problem.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e
2.0-RC1 (i386)
built on Mon Mar 14 17:33:11 EDT 2011
Log sorting is set to newest first, however, the log sort is randomly
incorrect (see screen snippet). I didn't see anything in redmine, thought I
would check here first..
[cid:image001.png@01CBF837.8BDBAAF0]
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems
, and then there is a rule right
beneath that rule that explicitly blocks outbound SMTP from all IP addresses on
the subnet, and I have logging turned on for that rule. So, the rule beneath
the one that should be triggered is being triggered instead.
Is there a Bug/Race condition in rule evaluation??
Dimitri
No, those are RSTs and FINs coming after the state is closed, expected
behavior.
http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Logs_show_%22blocked%22_for_traffic_from_a_legitimate_connection,_why%3F
Ok, but unless I'm misunderstanding, I am not logging packets blocked by the
default rule, so why would this
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Dimitri Rodis dimit...@integritasystems.com
wrote:
After an upgrade to this morning's snap, I received the following
after the upgrade/reboot (it's what's on my PuTTY atm):
Syncing OpenVPN settings...done.
Starting syslog...done.
Configuring firewall
the file
server's ip address at all. It almost looks like the host list is only looking
at traffic directed to pfSense itself as opposed to through that particular
interface.
Anyone else confirm?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
After an upgrade to this morning's snap, I received the following after the
upgrade/reboot (it's what's on my PuTTY atm):
Syncing OpenVPN settings...done.
Starting syslog...done.
Configuring firewall..done.
Starting PFLOG...done.
Setting up gateway monitors...done.
Synchronizing user
this might be?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
stuff
doesn't work ;)
Anyone else see this?
Dimitri Rodis
http://www.integritasystems.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
Commercial support
did not try using an Alias in
the External Subnet IP field, although it is RED also.
Anyone else see this?
Dimitri Rodis
http://www.integritasystems.com
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Dimitri Rodis dimit...@integritasystems.com
wrote:
pfSense 2.0-BETA5 (i386) built on Wed Jan 19 12:45:14 EST 2011
When I try to use an alias in the Internal IP field (suppose the alias
was
) I receive the following error upon saving (or trying to save
Hi Everyone,
Just loaded a nanobsd image of pfSense 2.0 onto a CF card for Alix board. I
have only used v1.2.3 in the past and I never used the internet to upgrade it.
In fact, I am under the impression that v1.2.3 is the latest and there are no
upgrades to it.
I am wondering if there is a
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko evg.yu...@rogers.com
wrote:
I do not know a lot about Hyper-v but in VMWare for instance you can
block frames with 'faked' mac-addresses. Probably you hit the same
problem as CARP-packets have MAC-addresses 'not real' but specifically
On 10-11-15 09:22 PM, Dimitri Rodis wrote:
I recently migrated a pfSense virtual machine (version 1.2.2) that was
running flawlessly on Hyper-V (first release) with 2 additional CARP IP
addresses on the WAN interface for about 16 months. Over the weekend, I
migrated that virtual machine over
to the original Hyper-V (non-R2) host.
Any ideas on why CARP IPs wouldn't work on Hyper-V R2? Is there something
since 1.2.2 that might change this?
Thanks,
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
If the port forwards are on the WAN addresses themselves, to my knowledge
they will not fail over. My understanding is that all addresses (and port
forwards) that you intend to survive a failover must be on CARP addresses.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Dimitri Rodis
dimit...@integritasystems.com wrote:
I would really like to see this work reliably at some point. From what I can
tell, this problem is not limited to just Fireboxes, it is on pretty much
all NICs that have
RTL8139C+ chips on them
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Hans Maes h...@bitnet.be wrote:
Although it is definately related to the type of NIC's in the watchguard
boards, I'm still not completely convinced this is 100% a hardware problem
since the Watchguard Linux OS seems to work just fine on it. Sounds more
like a
Stupid question--- the pfSense box is (still) the gateway address for your
network, right?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message-
From: apiase...@midatlanticbb.com [mailto:apiase...@midatlanticbb.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 5:42 PM
My understanding is that Giant lock is gone from the FreeBSD network stack
in 8:
http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/arch/2009-04/msg00075.html
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message-
From: Bill Marquette [mailto:bill.marque
I'm drafting a reply. Be done shortly.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message-
From: Tim Dressel [mailto:tjdres...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 11:11 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Captive Portal
Options box) to allow/limit/prevent internet access.
Hopefully that made some sense. It's a bit tough to describe without seeing
it! :)
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message-
From: Tim Dressel [mailto:tjdres...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 08
for about
15 months now--still running on 1.2-release. If you have some good managed
switches, that's the way to do it IMHO.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message-
From: RB [mailto:aoz@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 3:16 PM
,15669.0.html
Thanks,
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Schmidlkofer [mailto:joshl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 8:23 PM
To: support@pfsense.com; j...@pax2cargo.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Attention
reported that 2.0 gives him timeouts (see
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=15669). I don't yet have an
explanation as to why I get timeouts in 1.2.3 and not in 2.0, but I'm
working on figuring out why.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original
Tim,
See http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=15669 if you have issues with
the Firebox. I'm collecting as much data as I can from those that are having
issues.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message-
From: Tim Nelson [mailto:tnel
may not know about it).
With respect to ISA, there is a client installation (aka Firewall Client)
that is required to make the authentication transparent--without it, it
would work just like pfSense would-- with RADIUS against AD, and the user
would have to enter credentials manually.
Dimitri Rodis
portal, and have
the current windows logon credentials automatically pass to the captive
portal, which is currently not possible with pfSense-- ISA Server is the only
thing I know of that does this.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message
day of the week over ISA, even if it meant they had to
use credential prompts.
Bottom line: if eliminating credential prompts is an absolute must, ISA can
do it for sure. pfSense, not yet ;)
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message-
From
can
fix it.
Thanks to all that have helped, and thanks to those that are willing to
test!
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com http://www.integritasystems.com
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Forum link:
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,15669.0.html
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message-
From: cbuech...@gmail.com [mailto:cbuech...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Chris
Buechler
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2009 11:33 AM
There is a promiscuous mode on the vSwitches. That setting might need to be
adjusted.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message-
From: Tim Nelson [mailto:tnel...@fudnet.net]
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 9:01 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
I put that in also-- like I said it didn't take effect until I rebooted. If
the rule wasn't there, it wouldn't matter how many times I rebooted :)
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message-
From: Kimmo Paasiala [mailto:kpaas...@gmail.com]
Sent
didn't
dupe the section myself.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:sullr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 8:15 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] CARP Bug in 1.2.3
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:31 PM
The snapshot I'm using is dated April 1.. that's a couple of days after the
hackathon, I believe. Any idea when the xmlparse.inc from HEAD was removed?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:sullr...@gmail.com
Good deal. I'll go to a later snapshot then.
Are upgrades between snapshots on embedded working at the moment, or should
I just reflash?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:sullr...@gmail.com]
Sent
?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
/installedpackages
Shouldn't config/config only be in there once? Looks like it added
another config/config section it each time I tried to change/save it,
and it's only using the last one.
Bug or user error?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
smime.p7s
Nope, using embedded.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message-
From: cbuech...@gmail.com [mailto:cbuech...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Chris
Buechler
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 8:30 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support
!
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message-
From: Dimitri Rodis [mailto:dimit...@integritasystems.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 9:55 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] AW: Firebox X series w/ 1.2 and 1.2.2 issue
Woohoo
version of pfSense you are using J
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
From: Nathan Eisenberg [mailto:nat...@atlasnetworks.us]
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 9:10 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] Load Balancer Using TCP
Hello,
I
appear to really have any issues..
then I added a second LAN and a dedicated sync interface for CARP and threw it
into production, and it lasted about 10 minutes before it melted down with
watchdog timeouts.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original
Woohoo! Didn't know you guys got this put in.. I'll test tomorrow or
Thursday as time permits.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message-
From: cbuech...@gmail.com [mailto:cbuech...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Chris
Buechler
Sent: Tuesday, March
testing tomorrow.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message-
From: cbuech...@gmail.com [mailto:cbuech...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Chris
Buechler
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 6:05 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] ACPI/APIC
(and a specially sized sticker than can cover up the Firebox X logo J)
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
a full install on
these fireboxes is pretty tough and requires some soldering (I believe) to
get a keyboard header working, not to mention that you have to get the board
completely out of the chassis to fit a video card on it.
Thanks Chris..
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original
Switched the cables a few times now. 3 different pre-fab cables (different
colors even!).
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Cotter [mailto:andrew.cot...@somersetcapital.com]
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 12:35 PM
It looked that easy-- just wanted to be sure before messing with a
production set up!
Thanks,
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Paul Mansfield [mailto:it-admin-pfse...@taptu.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 4:45 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re
; echo /dev/ufs/pfSenseCfg
/cf ufs rw 1 1 /etc/fstab
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
also categorically never used squid in one of these setups either.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message-
From: RB [mailto:aoz@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 7:16 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support
Re-do what you did, but create a 2GB partition and try again. Leave the
other 6GB unused. I had this problem with an older PC and an actual 20GB
hard drive-- from what I understand, it has to do with the IDE--CF adapters
and how well they support LBA/DMA modes, etc.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita
What kind of Virtual IP are you using? If you are using CARP addresses
(which is what I'm using), make sure your subnet mask actually matches your
WAN interface subnet mask.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Jason Lixfeld [mailto:jason-lists.pfse
OpenManage Server Administrator is what you're looking for.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
From: Curtis LaMasters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 11:16 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Dell Hardware Monitoring - pfSense 1.2 Final
detected:
* A override already exists for this domain.
Is there a way that I can specify multiple DNS servers for a particular domain
suffix? You should be able to, IMO.
Thanks,
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
inline: image001.gif
interface to use the corresponding private IPs? That way, you can
use all your public IPs, and each client will have one-- I've never used
1:1 in conjunction with captive portal, though, so what I just said may or
may not work.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From
mail servers as
well).
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
to accomplish it.
Is there a particular reason you are trying to do a captive portal using a
bridge setup vs NAT?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris
Buechler
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 12:34 AM
Thanks, Scott.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 3:36 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] NAT Reflection States
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Dimitri Rodis
That's milliseconds, correct?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Dimitri Rodis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 3:38 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] NAT Reflection States
Thanks, Scott.
Dimitri Rodis
me last.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 3:44 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] NAT Reflection States
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 6:40 PM, Dimitri Rodis
[EMAIL
the -w param is in seconds according to
http://www.securityforest.com/wiki/index.php/Netcat_-_Basic_Overview
Any other ideas as to why connections would be dropping/timing out like
this?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Dimitri Rodis [mailto:[EMAIL
I am using
1.2-RELEASE
built on Sun Feb 24 17:04:58 EST 2008
so it isn't an RC thing.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: digger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 4:04 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] NAT
There are a ton of lines that look like this:
19004 stream tcp nowait/0nobody /usr/bin/nc nc -w 20
I guess we found the culprit then? Why is it using 20 as opposed to 2000?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto
).
I would rather not have to go get some junk 8 port managed switch just to
force a speed/duplex if it's possible to do in the pfSense config.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
different places
and it works quite well for us.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Tim Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 3:43 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Captive Portal enabling Ethernet Port Traffic
, I got barely over 2Mb. Using the Intel, I got 9.5Mb.
What kind of NICs are in your pfSense box?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Ted Crow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 1:03 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support
Adam,
This may sound strange, but you might want to load linux and vmware
server on the machine, and run pfSense virtualized until the hardware
support comes for your NICs. We run pfSense virtualized on Dell PE1800s,
PE2900s, and PE2950 servers all the time.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita
1. Did you install pfSense to the hard drive? (You need to for
packages)
2. Yes.. Go to the interfaces page and add it.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
From: Paul Peziol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 8:41 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject
appreciated!
Thanks,
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
So really the peer IP option is there for folks who don't have a
dedicated interface, so that the pfsync traffic doesn't flood the
network, is that right?
So, in a 3-way config, do you always have to make configuration changes
on the master? Or can they be made on any of them?
Dimitri Rodis
be moot if there's a way to do it already..
Thanks guys..
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 5:32 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] 3-way CARP
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008
(or both) of the above scenarios
work using pfSense?
If not, if someone can give me a bump in the right direction, maybe I
can add it to the FreeRADIUS package and send that change to coreteam
also.
Thanks,
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
Any workaround for getting DHCP to work on the WAN interface?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
Would a WRAP board be capable of NATting and Shaping a 10 megabit
symmetric connection without choking?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2008 6:41 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Captive Portal
Dimitri Rodis wrote:
If I wanted to display a user's IP
, and if I am able to display that
information on the Captive Portal, I can just have them read it to me as
opposed to trying to step them through all of the hoops to get the mac
address.
Thanks,
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
the WAN tab to show up (and
DHCP to work) on the WAN side?
I will submit the feature request shortly.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 10:42 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense
if there's a quick workaround that anyone
knows of, that would be great.
Thanks,
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 10:42 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] DHCP
Is there a better place to post/email this stuff? I don't seem to be
getting much in the way of responses. I have some nice additions to the
FreeRADIUS package that I want to submit, but I would like to add the
logging support before I do.
Trying to contribute!
Thanks,
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita
The pfSense log viewer is broken?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 1:02 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] FreeRADIUS Package
On 3/6/08, Dimitri Rodis [EMAIL
You need to use Manual Outbound NAT, and add a rule above the default
rule that has the source address of your machine, destination * *, and
then select the address of your WAN2 interface.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
From: Michael Richardson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
/Special:Search/Setting_up_CARP_with_pf
Sense in other pages or edit this page
http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php?title=Setting_up_CARP_with_pfSenseact
ion=edit .
Where'd the CARP doc go?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
something wrong?
Congrats on a great release, by the way. :)
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
changes so far? (I did the VLAN support
already, figured I'd send that up now and then follow up with the logging
stuff).
Thanks,
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
2990 S Durango Drive
Las Vegas, NV 89117
P: 702.896.7207
F: 702.228.0208
C: 702.296.4217
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
are the maintainer of that package?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Once I have changes made, how should I go about getting these changes
into a pfSense install to test before I send any patches up? Should I be
using the dev iso?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February
.) Does it take something more than just adding a reference to
the location of the log in the .xml file somewhere?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Dimitri Rodis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 4:29 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject
as expected. Once they do,
I'll send them up.
Thanks--
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Fuchs, Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 3:52 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: AW: [pfSense Support] FreeRADIUS Package
Or just replace
with is probably 30-40 somewhere.
So in these cases, what would you choose? ;)
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Angelo Turetta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 1:09 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Multiple
..
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 12:31 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Multiple servers behind NAT'd firewall
On Feb 6, 2008 3:29 PM, Sean Cavanaugh [EMAIL
server
isn't running on pfSense) is 192.168.99.100 thru 192.168.99.199. What I
would like to do is block outbound SMTP on only the machines that have a
dynamically assigned address. Is it possible to create a single rule in
pfSense to accomplish this?
Thanks--
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita
understanding correctly?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Bill Marquette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 3:14 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Rule Question
Yes. You'll need to create a subnet alias - say
The *wizard* doesn't include IAX traffic, but pfSense will still do what
you want. All that you have to do is add rules to put the traffic into
the appropriate queues on the shaper rules page.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
that is how you change a port's untagged membership to a
VLAN. Then on an entirely separate page, you can set up the tagged
ports. Very unfriendly and confusing compared to the HPs.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ugo
, the ports should be members of the appropriate VLAN, but
*untagged*.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ugo Bellavance
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 12:52 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] pfsense
so, AND you have NICs that
support it properly under FreeBSD), and all of the others should NOT be
tagged (excluding any connections to VLAN capable switches).
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ugo Bellavance
Sent
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
