[pfSense Support] HAVP+SQUID Transparent

2009-04-24 Thread Mikel Jimenez
Helloo Im not able to put HAVP + SQUID in tranasparent mode, using cache_peer options... Somebody succesfull in this task? Thanks -- Mikel Jimenez Fernandez Irontec, Internet y Sistemas sobre GNU/LinuX - http://www.irontec.com +34 94.404.81.82

Re: [pfSense Support] HAVP

2006-08-15 Thread Gary Buckmaster
HAVP and ClamAV have both been marked as Alpha software and should be treated as such. To the best of my knowledge, HAVP is currently broken and will not install, but Raj (the package author) has been busy and unavailable to chase down the problem. -Gary Ryan Rodrigue wrote: Does anyone

[pfSense Support] HAVP

2006-08-14 Thread Samer Chaer
Dear Sirs, I am trying to install HAVP package but I got the following: === Downloading package configuration file... done. Saving updated package information... done. Downloading havp and its dependencies... done. Checking for successful package

[pfSense Support] HAVP

2006-08-14 Thread Ryan Rodrigue
Does anyone know if the HAVP package works with RL2? Was the issues with loadbalancing transparent mode fixed also? Thanks, Ryan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [pfSense Support] HAVP

2006-05-31 Thread Raja Subramanian
Hi, On 5/27/06, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is a FAQ. Load balancing does not work with Squid, HAVP or any other userland running application including PFTPX. No, there is no work-around until true multi-path support is added to FreeBSD. I'm currently working on a solution

Re: [pfSense Support] HAVP

2006-05-31 Thread Scott Ullrich
Oh dude that's you. I'm fully aware of your posting on misc@ ;) On 6/1/06, Raja Subramanian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On 5/27/06, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is a FAQ. Load balancing does not work with Squid, HAVP or any other userland running application including

Re: [pfSense Support] HAVP

2006-05-30 Thread Gary Buckmaster
Raj, I wouldn't run freshclam from cron. It's a very small daemon and very efficient. Much better to let it run and update all on its own according to its configuration file. Just my opinion, however. -Gary Rajkumar S wrote: I haven't enabled clamav-freshclam also, I am running

Re: [pfSense Support] HAVP

2006-05-30 Thread Rajkumar S
Gary Buckmaster wrote: I wouldn't run freshclam from cron. It's a very small daemon and very efficient. Much better to let it run and update all on its own according to its configuration file. Just my opinion, however. I chose to run from cron because that was easy from a package writers

Re: [pfSense Support] HAVP

2006-05-30 Thread Gary Buckmaster
Rajkumar S wrote: I chose to run from cron because that was easy from a package writers point of view. I also agree that making it a daemon is better, because currently there is no safe way to remove a cron entry when a package is removed. I will update the package to run freshclam as a

Re: [pfSense Support] HAVP

2006-05-28 Thread Gary Buckmaster
I suspect he's seeing clamav-freshclam running which should happen by default 5 times a day. This is, of course, configurable in the configuration file. Oh, and should ClamAV always be running. Mine runs for a little while and then shuts down. I don't know if this is normal. clamd

Re: [pfSense Support] HAVP

2006-05-28 Thread Rajkumar S
Gary Buckmaster wrote: I suspect he's seeing clamav-freshclam running which should happen by default 5 times a day. This is, of course, configurable in the configuration file. I haven't enabled clamav-freshclam also, I am running freshclam from cron. Let me check that out. raj Oh, and

Re: [pfSense Support] HAVP

2006-05-27 Thread Rajkumar S
Ebay wrote: Wow, thanks. This is a great program. I have one question / Bug. HAVP does not seem to work with load balancing. Is there anyone out there who knows a workaround for this. I have not yet thought about that. I will check that and if it's feasible I will enable it in HAVP

[pfSense Support] HAVP

2006-05-26 Thread Ebay
Title: HAVP Hey All. I am atempting to get HAVP to work. I have installed the package. Whats the next step? DO I need to manually load any virus definations? How can I test to see if it is working. I think a router based antivirus is a great line of defense. I would rely totally on just

Re: [pfSense Support] HAVP

2006-05-26 Thread Gary Buckmaster
First and foremost, if you installed the HAVP package and don't have the ClamAV package installed, you'll need to install that. ClamAV will update its definitions automatically so you can safely ignore that part. Once you have HAVP set up and configured (transparent mode doesn't currently

RE: [pfSense Support] HAVP

2006-05-26 Thread Ebay
Title: RE: [pfSense Support] HAVP I feel stupid because there doesn't seem to be any complicated settings here, but i can't seem to get it to work. I set up the proxie settings in my browser and loose internet conectivity. Is there a way to do this that I don't have to go to every computer

Re: [pfSense Support] HAVP

2006-05-26 Thread Gary Buckmaster
that, but everywhere I add protection is a good thing * -Original Message- From: Gary Buckmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 8:02 AM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] HAVP First and foremost, if you installed the HAVP package and don't have

RE: [pfSense Support] HAVP

2006-05-26 Thread Ebay
Title: RE: [pfSense Support] HAVP OK i got it. I had it set with no ip address in that field, but it wasn't working so i tried putting one. I didn't realise i had to go into Statucservices and start HAVP. It seems to be working now. Thanks a bunch. Sorry if I aggrivated you too much. Ryan

RE: [pfSense Support] HAVP

2006-05-26 Thread Ebay
Title: RE: [pfSense Support] HAVP Wow, thanks. This is a great program. I have one question / Bug. HAVP does not seem to work with load balancing. Is there anyone out there who knows a workaround for this. I am currently using load balancing for fallover purposes and if I use HAVP, I loose

Re: [pfSense Support] HAVP

2006-05-26 Thread Scott Ullrich
, and should ClamAV always be running. Mine runs for a little while and then shuts down. I don't know if this is normal. Thanks Ryan -Original Message- From: Rajkumar S [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:05 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] HAVP

Re: [pfSense Support] HAVP Bug Report

2006-05-24 Thread Rajkumar S
Gary Buckmaster wrote: Looks a lot better! The settings are staying and appear to be functioning as advertised. Nice to hear that! The only weirdness now, which I think is a HAVP thing and not your work, is that HAVP seems to split the difference between SERVERNUMBER and MAXSERVERS. Right

Re: [pfSense Support] HAVP Bug Report

2006-05-23 Thread Rajkumar S
Gary Buckmaster wrote: When editing the HAVP configurations, the settings aren't saved in the WebGUI. When you view havp.config you see that the settings are actually being appended to the configuration file, rather than replacing the currently blank settings. Even after removing the empty

Re: [pfSense Support] HAVP Bug Report

2006-05-23 Thread Gary Buckmaster
Raj, Thanks for jumping on this, and thanks for such a great package. I'm available for testing any new fixes you have, so feel free to ping me when you're ready. Also, a question about the blacklist/whitelist feature. This appears to work properly in the GUI, although HAVP doesn't seem

Re: [pfSense Support] HAVP Bug Report

2006-05-23 Thread Gary Buckmaster
Raj, I think I found the issue. It appears that you've defined havp.config as living in /etc/havp.config and sure enough, you've written a very nice havp.config file in /etc. If you change that to /usr/local/etc/ I think you win. -Gary Gary Buckmaster wrote: Raj, Thanks for jumping on

Re: [pfSense Support] HAVP Bug Report

2006-05-23 Thread Rajkumar S
Gary Buckmaster wrote: I think I found the issue. It appears that you've defined havp.config as living in /etc/havp.config and sure enough, you've written a very nice havp.config file in /etc. If you change that to /usr/local/etc/ I think you win. Thanks for your testing and feedback. The

Re: [pfSense Support] HAVP Bug Report

2006-05-23 Thread Rajkumar S
Gary Buckmaster wrote: Thanks for jumping on this, and thanks for such a great package. I'm available for testing any new fixes you have, so feel free to ping me when you're ready. Hi, I think I have fixed the gui update problem. I have not yet updated the fix to main pfsense repository.

[pfSense Support] HAVP Bug Report

2006-05-22 Thread Gary Buckmaster
First off, thanks for the HAVP and ClamAV packages, they look as though they're off to a good start. I have, however, run into a few errors that are show-stoppers at this time. When editing the HAVP configurations, the settings aren't saved in the WebGUI. When you view havp.config you see