Eugen Leitl wrote:
Noise: I think the microdrive is next to silent.
IIRC reliability is a problem.
I've never heard the microdrive in my zaurus c3100, and I can't remember
the last time I heard of one fail!
damn, I've just doomed myself, haven't I?
lol, that is very possible - yes.
a 4GB model would be sufficiant for logging, using ntop imspector
??
I guess proxy is out of the question, since the access is not that fast
like a real HD
Paul M schreef:
Eugen Leitl wrote:
Noise: I think the microdrive is next to
Yup. your screwed.
-Original Message-
From: Paul M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 9:43 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Microdrive or CF card
Eugen Leitl wrote:
Noise: I think the microdrive is next to silent.
IIRC
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 12:38:13AM +0100, Rainer Duffner wrote:
Noise: I think the microdrive is next to silent.
IIRC reliability is a problem.
--
Eugen* Leitl a href=http://leitl.org;leitl/a http://leitl.org
__
ICBM: 48.07100,
Hi,
I am investigating a bit about m0n0wall pfSense... to my knowledge, it
seems that a CF card is not really a good medium to have many writes
onto... so currently I am running m0n0wall for that reason.
I know the embedded version of pfSense is comparable with m0n0wall (eg.
loading into
Am 15.03.2008 um 00:07 schrieb Michel Servaes:
Hi,
I am investigating a bit about m0n0wall pfSense... to my
knowledge, it seems that a CF card is not really a good medium to
have many writes onto... so currently I am running m0n0wall for
that reason.
I know the embedded version of
Yes it has changed, theres an option in the full install where you
select the embedded kernel and choose grub as the boot method.
I have 12 alix boards running on hitachi microdrives on full installs
with packages, all of them work flawless. As far as noise they make no
noise completely silent.
