Re: [pfSense Support] Summary of problems in Bridging Mode

2005-10-29 Thread Chris Buechler
Scott Ullrich wrote: That is correct as of the recent version that doesn't install anti-spoof, anti-lockout rules, etc for the lan subnet. I did some bridging testing this evening, with 0.89.6, a version that's not publicly available yet. The above is still a problem, but with an IP on

Re: [pfSense Support] Summary of problems in Bridging Mode

2005-10-28 Thread Scott Ullrich
All these issues have been fixed. Please wait until the next version. On 10/28/05, Peter Zaitsev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I've recently tried number of variants of setting pfsense in Bridging mode of my small subnet and I guess here is the state of things as it is now. Scott was going

Re: [pfSense Support] Summary of problems in Bridging Mode

2005-10-28 Thread Peter Zaitsev
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 12:11 -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote: All these issues have been fixed. Please wait until the next version. Sure. I'm checking mirrors and your home directory every day for new stuff to try :) So what is going to be official way for bridging mode ? Is it no IP for LAN or

Re: [pfSense Support] Summary of problems in Bridging Mode

2005-10-28 Thread Scott Ullrich
I think it will work better with a dummy ip. But it will work without a ip as well now. Scott On 10/28/05, Peter Zaitsev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 12:11 -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote: All these issues have been fixed. Please wait until the next version. Sure. I'm

Re: [pfSense Support] Summary of problems in Bridging Mode

2005-10-28 Thread Peter Zaitsev
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 13:05 -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote: I think it will work better with a dummy ip. But it will work without a ip as well now. Hm. Dummy IP looks like ugliest and the most unintuitive solution. Also as I noted it results in few options breaking - anti lockout and stuff. If

Re: [pfSense Support] Summary of problems in Bridging Mode

2005-10-28 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 10/28/05, Peter Zaitsev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 13:05 -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote: I think it will work better with a dummy ip. But it will work without a ip as well now. Hm. Dummy IP looks like ugliest and the most unintuitive solution. Also as I noted it

Re: [pfSense Support] Summary of problems in Bridging Mode

2005-10-28 Thread Peter Zaitsev
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 13:42 -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote: On 10/28/05, Peter Zaitsev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 13:05 -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote: I think it will work better with a dummy ip. But it will work without a ip as well now. Hm. Dummy IP looks like ugliest

Re: [pfSense Support] Summary of problems in Bridging Mode

2005-10-28 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 10/28/05, Peter Zaitsev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But the rule will will not be functional with fake IP address - it typically does not make sense as there are no from/to ips in the network - fake is not really used anywhere. So why to keep them with fake IP wasting resources instead of

Re: [pfSense Support] Summary of problems in Bridging Mode

2005-10-28 Thread Dan Swartzendruber
At 03:17 PM 10/28/2005, you wrote: On 10/28/05, Peter Zaitsev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But the rule will will not be functional with fake IP address - it typically does not make sense as there are no from/to ips in the network - fake is not really used anywhere. So why to keep them with

Re: [pfSense Support] Summary of problems in Bridging Mode

2005-10-28 Thread Scott Ullrich
That is correct as of the recent version that doesn't install anti-spoof, anti-lockout rules, etc for the lan subnet. Scott On 10/28/05, Dan Swartzendruber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 03:17 PM 10/28/2005, you wrote: On 10/28/05, Peter Zaitsev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But the rule will will

Re: [pfSense Support] Summary of problems in Bridging Mode

2005-10-28 Thread Dan Swartzendruber
At 03:22 PM 10/28/2005, you wrote: That is correct as of the recent version that doesn't install anti-spoof, anti-lockout rules, etc for the lan subnet. Hmmm, actually, I don't know if it makes a difference, but my experience was with an OPT interface being bridged to the WAN, not the LAN.

Re: [pfSense Support] Summary of problems in Bridging Mode

2005-10-28 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 10/28/05, Dan Swartzendruber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 03:22 PM 10/28/2005, you wrote: Hmmm, actually, I don't know if it makes a difference, but my experience was with an OPT interface being bridged to the WAN, not the LAN. Does that matter? It works, but... In m0n0wall you cannot

Re: [pfSense Support] Summary of problems in Bridging Mode

2005-10-28 Thread Dan Swartzendruber
At 03:27 PM 10/28/2005, you wrote: On 10/28/05, Dan Swartzendruber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 03:22 PM 10/28/2005, you wrote: Hmmm, actually, I don't know if it makes a difference, but my experience was with an OPT interface being bridged to the WAN, not the LAN. Does that matter? It

Re: [pfSense Support] Summary of problems in Bridging Mode

2005-10-28 Thread Jeroen
On 10/28/05, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In m0n0wall you cannot bridge to LAN at all. The reason that these problems surfaced was due to this fact. Actually i'm using that for my Wireless lan. It does work. Also in PFSense. -- Jeroen

[pfSense Support] Summary of problems in Bridging Mode

2005-10-27 Thread Peter Zaitsev
Hi, I've recently tried number of variants of setting pfsense in Bridging mode of my small subnet and I guess here is the state of things as it is now. Scott was going to fix some of these issues but I guess it is good to summarize them anyway. So running in bridging mode you set