Fwd: FW: [pfSense Support] ADD more routes to IPsec Tunnel

2006-06-23 Thread Tunge2
is this command/function echo 1 /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward default enabled in pfsense (RC1)? or do i have toenableit manually (how can i do this because /proc doesn't existed?) Van: Tunge2 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Verzonden: woensdag 21 juni 2006 17:48 Aan:

Re: Fwd: FW: [pfSense Support] ADD more routes to IPsec Tunnel

2006-06-23 Thread Rainer Duffner
Tunge2 schrieb: is this command/function *echo 1 /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward *default enabled in pfsense (RC1)? or do i have to enable it manually (how can i do this because /proc doesn't existed?) FreeBSD ain't Linux. pfSense = FreeBSD. I think FreeBSD6 has abandoned procfs. It's

Re: Fwd: FW: [pfSense Support] ADD more routes to IPsec Tunnel

2006-06-23 Thread Tunge2
Does PFsenssay for example, routebetween a tun0and atun1interface? or do i need the ip_forward trick or do i need something else? why did you say edFreeBSD6 has abandoned procfs.It's considered evil, IIRC. 2006/6/23, Rainer Duffner [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Tunge2 schrieb: is this command/function *echo

Re: Fwd: FW: [pfSense Support] ADD more routes to IPsec Tunnel

2006-06-23 Thread Alvaro Pietrobono
You can verify this: sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding if is 1 forwarding between every interface is enable, if 0 not. ~Alvaro - Original Message - From: Tunge2 To: support@pfsense.com Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 12:57 PM Subject: Re: Fwd: FW: [pfSense Support] ADD

Re: Fwd: FW: [pfSense Support] ADD more routes to IPsec Tunnel

2006-06-23 Thread Tunge2
To: support@pfsense.com Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 12:57 PM Subject: Re: Fwd: FW: [pfSense Support] ADD more routes to IPsec Tunnel Does PFsenssay for example, routebetween a tun0and atun1interface? or do i need the ip_forward trick or do i need something else? why did you say edFreeBSD6 has abandoned