First step, upgrade to latest release, 1.2-RC3 as there have been MANY fixes
put in since 1.0.1
-Sean
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 09:17:45 -0800 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
support@pfsense.com Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Virtual Ips I am
having the same problem. I have an external IP
Under Virtual IP's are you using Carp, Proxy Arp, or IP? If you want to use
1:1 NAT, go ahead and do so for that specific IP address, then under the
firewall rules add in a rule to match the traffic you would like to permit.
It should be that simple. Additionally, the IP's 73 and 72 are within
sorry. i mistyped. I am at 1.2RC3
-Original Message-
From: Sean Cavanaugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 11:41 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Virtual Ips
First step, upgrade to latest release, 1.2-RC3 as there have been MANY
LaMasters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 10:00 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Virtual Ips
Under Virtual IP's are you using Carp, Proxy Arp, or IP? If you want to
use 1:1 NAT, go ahead and do so for that specific IP address, then under
/
From: Curtis LaMasters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 10:00 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Virtual Ips
Under Virtual IP's are you using Carp, Proxy Arp, or IP? If you want to
use 1:1 NAT, go ahead
.
-Tim
From: Ryan Rodrigue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 10:27 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Virtual Ips
I have it setup as Proxy ARP
I went to 1:1 NAT and firewall rules and specified the 73 and 72 as two
seperate entries using
LaMasters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 12:00 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Virtual Ips
Under Virtual IP's are you using Carp, Proxy Arp, or IP? If you want to use
1:1 NAT, go ahead and do so for that specific IP address, then under
and the block what i don't need after.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Dickson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 12:19 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Virtual Ips
What are the rules you are using on the WAN for traffic.
Keep in mind
On Dec 26, 2007 12:13 PM, James Kusler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It gave the choices 'CARP', 'Web Proxy', and 'Other'. So if that has
changed in the newer version that may help.
If it truly says Web Proxy, you didn't get an official release from
us! It should read, CARP, Proxy ARP, and Other.
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Virtual Ips
On Dec 26, 2007 12:13 PM, James Kusler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It gave the choices 'CARP', 'Web Proxy', and 'Other'. So if that has
changed in the newer version that may help.
If it truly says Web Proxy, you didn't get
it may be a
misconfiguration on the server itself.
-Tim
From: Ryan Rodrigue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 11:05 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Virtual Ips
Sorry. I forgot to let you know. I do have the correct IP address assigned
-Original Message-
From: James Kusler
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 11:32 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Virtual Ips
I have just installed to hard drive the latest version (1.2-RC3).
So I am starting with a fresh system. We'll see what happens.
Again, thanks
Support] Virtual Ips
On Dec 26, 2007 12:13 PM, James Kusler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It gave the choices 'CARP', 'Web Proxy', and 'Other'. So if that has
changed in the newer version that may help.
If it truly says Web Proxy, you didn't get an official release from
us! It should read, CARP
@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Virtual Ips
On Dec 26, 2007 12:13 PM, James Kusler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It gave the choices 'CARP', 'Web Proxy', and 'Other'. So if that has
changed in the newer version that may help.
If it truly says Web Proxy, you didn't get an official release from
us
On Dec 26, 2007 1:30 PM, James Kusler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or I can bridge the modem and connect using the firewall on PPPoE.
With PPPoE and pfSense terminating the connection, 'other' is the
option you want for virtual IPs.
--Bill
]
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 12:50 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Virtual Ips
On Dec 26, 2007 1:30 PM, James Kusler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or I can bridge the modem and connect using the firewall on PPPoE.
With PPPoE and pfSense terminating the connection
If possible the modem should be nothing more than a delivery mechanism for
network transport. No IP address, no routing, no configuration really.
Curtis
Nate Davis wrote:
Howdy,
pfSense has been a solid firewall for home use, and now I am
implementing it as a firewall at work. I have run into a snag, and
not really sure what the problem is. I am running 89.2
Here is my Setup:
WAN (ATT-T1): 12.165.119.195
LAN: 192.168.40.1
I can use
Chris,
Thanks for the clarification. I will be doing a 1:1 Nat for the Mail
Server for sure. That seems like the best route for the Mail Server.
I guess you would call it Standard NAT (TCP). Not sure exactly what you
are asking specifically. Let me see if this example helps.
WAN IP:
Howdy,
OK, I figured out the problem I was having... Turns out that for FTP,
which is what I was trying to Port Forward with, there is a userland
FTP-Proxy that is turned on by default. This was causing the Incoming FTP
Connections to hang and timeout. I turned this off in the Advanced Page,
On 10/29/05, Nate Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howdy,
OK, I figured out the problem I was having... Turns out that for FTP,
which is what I was trying to Port Forward with, there is a userland
FTP-Proxy that is turned on by default. This was causing the Incoming FTP
Connections to hang
On 10/29/05, Nate Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howdy,
OK, I figured out the problem I was having... Turns out that for FTP,
which is what I was trying to Port Forward with, there is a userland
FTP-Proxy that is turned on by default. This was causing the Incoming
FTP
Connections to hang
suspended: connect to
kundt.homeip.net[213.191.40.68]: Connection timed out
-- Forwarded message --
From: Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Bastian Schern [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 18:18:24 -0500
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Virtual IPs not working
On 8
You cannot ping proxy-arp'd ips unless there are 1:1 NAT setup.
Is this how your forwarding or using port forward?
Scott
On 8/22/05, Bastian Schern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm using pfSense Version 0.79.2 and my Virtual IPs are not functional.
--- snip ---
virtualip
On 8/22/05, Bastian Schern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
SNIP
I'm using pfSense Version 0.79.2 and my Virtual IPs are not functional.
It's not possible to ping any Virtual Interface. Most important thing is
to get the external IPs back to work. Because all of them should be
forwarded to
Chris Buechler schrieb:
[...]
It looks like the virtual IPs are not existing. If I try to ping e.g.
192.168.3.1 I get Destination Host Unreachable.
From the firewall itself? I don't think that'll work (due to loopback
issues). If traffic passes in and out just fine, as intended, then
you're
26 matches
Mail list logo
