Hi all !
Im at the end of my DNS-understanding of pfSense ;-)
Ok, not that bad, but:
I got a Domain-Controller that hosts a DNS-Server in my LAN for my local domain. This DC forwards unknown DNS-requests to my pfSense, which gets the DNS from my ISP.
In pfSense I have configured the
On 8/7/06, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/6/06, Raja Subramanian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an RC2 setup with load balancing going on multiple WAN
interfaces (WAN, OPT1, 2).
I deleted the OPT3 interfacee, but did not delete the corresponding
NAT rules associated with OPT3.
Woops! Forgot the firewall rule *BLUSH*.
Can you try again?
Due to time-zone stuff came in this morning and all was shiny.
Thanks Robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Thanks for everyone's responses. I have it setup like Robert
suggested, with 192.168.2.x on OPT1 and doing dns views and port
forwarding. It all seems to be working as it should.
Is there any way to share the block of static IP addresses across the
WAN and OPT interfaces so no port
Woops! Forgot the firewall rule *BLUSH*.
Can you try again?
And the pfsense.loquefaltaba.com firewall rule...
Can you add this rule again?
Regards.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
The DNS override only works for items querying pfsense, not for
pfsense itself. It and the daemon that does the DNS overriding
(dnsmasq) use resolv.conf which should be populated with your ISPs DNS
servers. You appear to have a bit of a catch-22. Since you have a
FULL resolver internal to your
On 8/16/06, Raja Subramanian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just tested this out on RC2e and rdr, pass/block rules are behaving
themselves. However, NAT rules are still broken and after deleting
my interface, my rules.debug reads:
nat on $ from 192.168.0.0/24 to any - ()
An improvement now is
Bill Plein wrote:
Hello, all.
I am running RC2, and have just added a new set of queues in order to
put my Carbonite traffic into a low priority queue. I created my queues
by copying a queue configuration created by the Traffic Shaping wizard.
(by the way, Carbonite is a very cool and
On 8/16/06, Bill Plein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Plein wrote:
Hello, all.
I am running RC2, and have just added a new set of queues in order to
put my Carbonite traffic into a low priority queue. I created my queues
by copying a queue configuration created by the Traffic Shaping wizard.
Scott Ullrich wrote:
RRD graphs are broken on my RC2 WRAP system. Seems to be related to
a new
queue I created. Has anyone else seen the error I quoted?
This is a known problem. You need to instruct the system to recreate
the RRD queues after changing their names.
To do so, rm -rf
On 8/16/06, Bill Plein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Scott. That cleared it up. I was unsubbed from the list for the
last couple of months or so, I missed this.
No problem. I just commited a few changes to ensure this won't be an
issue going forward.
Scott
On 8/16/06, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please try this patch: http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/patchset?cn=13791
That's fixed it. Two thumbs up! Thanks!
- Raja
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Hello all, new to the list and pfsense.
What we are wanting to do is setup a bridge basically.
We like IPCOP as a managed Firewall option, but for redundancy reasons, have
had to add a DSL and Cable Broadband connection to our Network. Previously
we only had a DSL connection from verizon. It
Hi all,
I setup a new 1.0-RC2 box yesterday with a fairly simple config. On the
wan side a /29 is available and the pfsense box has the second IP of that
block for the wan interface and the first as the gateway. The lan side is
all nat with simple shaper rules (just voip priority). A third
On 8/16/06, Charles Sprickman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I setup a new 1.0-RC2 box yesterday with a fairly simple config. On the
wan side a /29 is available and the pfsense box has the second IP of that
block for the wan interface and the first as the gateway. The lan side is
all nat
On 8/16/06, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/16/06, Charles Sprickman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I setup a new 1.0-RC2 box yesterday with a fairly simple config. On the
wan side a /29 is available and the pfsense box has the second IP of that
block for the wan interface
What we are wanting to do is setup a bridge basically.
We like IPCOP as a managed Firewall option, but for redundancy reasons, have
had to add a DSL and Cable Broadband connection to our Network. Previously
we only had a DSL connection from verizon. It has issues more often than
not. We have
In the config for a user with pptp there is the option to
allocate a specific ip address. Ive done this but given I allocated the
first one in the range notice that it is provided to other users as well.
How do you configure it so that a specific user gets only
that one address and its
-Original Message-
From: Heath Henderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 3:21 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] Pfsense Bridge/Router 2WANs
What we are wanting to do is setup a bridge basically.
Loadbalancing and/or
Either assign this user an IP outside the pool or assign all users specific IPs
so the pool won't be used.
Holger
-Original Message-
From: Craig Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 3:42 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] pptp address
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006, Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 8/16/06, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/16/06, Charles Sprickman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I setup a new 1.0-RC2 box yesterday with a fairly simple config. On the
wan side a /29 is available and the pfsense box has the
I notice that the date on the embedded rc2 image available on the mirrors
changes regularly - does this mean that it incorporates released patches or
should I follow the procedure outlined below to get to the most
correct/fixed release?
--
Craig Silva. IT
22 matches
Mail list logo
