Hello!
Beta1 here. When pfsense started up, it gave warnings, one warning
message per second which looked like this:
Warning: wrong datatype for second argument in /etc/inc/config.inc
But after a lot of warnings like this it finally starts up (5 minutes+).
I have done /etc/rc.firmware
Hello on this screen: Peer to Peer networking at :Enable/Disable specific P2P protocols Does putting a check next to an item Enable or Disable the item.thanksRob
checking an item sends that kind of traffic to low priority.
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Robert Fantini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 5. Februar 2006 17:59
An: pfSense Support
Betreff: [pfSense Support] Traffic shaping question, peer to peer networking
screen
Thanks.
btw, what does the 'AW:' mean in the reply subject?
On Feb 5, 2006, at 12:02 PM, Holger Bauer wrote:
checking an item sends that kind of traffic to low priority.
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Robert Fantini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 5. Februar
Yeah, reinstall from scratch using an image from
http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/1.0-BETA1-TESTING-SNAPSHOT-2-2-06/
On 2/5/06, Szasz Revai Endre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
Beta1 here. When pfsense started up, it gave warnings, one warning
message per second which looked like this:
Holger is from Germany and uses a german mail client.
On 2/5/06, Robert Fantini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks.
btw, what does the 'AW:' mean in the reply subject?
On Feb 5, 2006, at 12:02 PM, Holger Bauer wrote:
checking an item sends that kind of traffic to low priority.
Holger
Robert Fantini wrote:
Thanks.
btw, what does the 'AW:' mean in the reply subject?
It means aw, shucks, I'm using Outlook and it even translates my headers.
SCNR.
cu,
Rainer
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Corporate decision, can't do anything against it ;-)
and by the way, there are not many alternatives that work well together
with blackberrys :-/
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Rainer Duffner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 5. Februar 2006 18:45
An:
Ok, did some changes. Now my german contacts get RE's too but I guess that
should be no problem ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Holger Bauer
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 6:57 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: AW: AW: [pfSense Support] Traffic shaping question, peer to
I really wouldnt worry about it honestly.
On 2/5/06, Holger Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, did some changes. Now my german contacts get RE's too but I guess that
should be no problem ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Holger Bauer
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 6:57 PM
To:
The problem is, it can break mailing list archives and start new topics though
it only is an answer to an already existing one. I'll keep it in international
settings for now until somebody is complaining.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday,
Will whoever keeps sending me these damn things 3 times a week please stop!
The first 25 times I receieved it was enough.
Thanks!
-- Forwarded message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Feb 5, 2006 1:13 PM
Subject: pfSense failed installation logs
To: [EMAIL
The command: /usr/sbin/tcpdump -l -n -e -ttt -i pflog0Gives logs like this:000319 rule 35/0(match): block in on fxp1: 24.39.185.75.36838 24.39.185.78.1408: S 1674449733:1674449733(0) win 1024You'll notice ... NO PROTOCOL INFO !!!But, a command like this: /usr/sbin/tcpdump -l -n -e -ttt -v -i
Uhh, then you're not on a pfSense box?
On 2/5/06, David Strout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# find / -name filter.inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~#
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ls -al /etc/inc
/usr/bin/ls: /etc/inc: No such file or directory
--
David L. Strout
Engineering Systems Plus, LLC
I beg your pardon ... I installed it from the
pfsense.iso from
http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/1.0-BETA1-TESTING-SNAPSHOT-2-2-06/
# uname -a
FreeBSD espfwvpn2.espmaine.net 6.0-STABLE FreeBSD
6.0-STABLE #0: Fri Feb 3 21:11:08 UTC 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj.pfSense/usr/src/sys/pfSense.6
David,
If /etc/inc/filter.inc didn't exist then NOTHING would work, I promise you.
I have no idea what you have going on other there but all I can say is
that /etc/inc/filter.inc does exist, look at CVSWEB and you will see
that this is where the file lives.
I figured that was the case with the md5' ... that
make perfect sense. I seem to have had some
residual ext3 fs garbage on the old install ...
funny how the system even booted at all ... can't
explain that one. I have re patririoned and
re-formatted and re-installed the ISO and
everything seems
Now that I have my head out of my posterior ...
where can I dig into that one.
--
David L. Strout
Engineering Systems Plus, LLC
- Original Message -
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [pfSense Support] firewall
logs no show
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: support@pfsense.com
Date: 02-05-2006 2:41 pm
Just wondering if there is a reason why extended characters
eg. ! are not accepted in the pptp user password?
Thanks
John
I just fixed the HTTPS captive portal. Please test it on the next
snapshot that will be released sometime later today.
On 2/3/06, Ronald Henriksen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rebooted with https captive portal on got the same affect no login page
displayed. Same no TCP 8000 or 8001 open
We inherited all of the input validation code from m0n0wall, so I
suspect this is not possible there as well.
On 2/5/06, John Cianfarani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just wondering if there is a reason why extended characters eg. ! are not
accepted in the pptp user password?
Thanks
John
Thats interesting as dhcrelay now exists. Is it not running?
On 2/4/06, lartc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi scott,
thanks for the info -- i downloaded and dd'd the new image onto cf
flash, however, the issue persists.
bummer -- but pfsense is still fabulous!
cheers
charles
On Fri,
Where is the full update? Under http://pfsense.com/~sullrich/ I only see a
02-Feb-2006 full update.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 1:55 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] RE: *SPAM*[pfSense
Doing some testing with 1.0-BETA1-TESTING-SNAPSHOT-2-2-06 and whenever I
enable PPTP I get this error in the logs:
php: : There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:171:
syntax error pfctl: Syntax error in config file: pf rules not loaded -
The line in question reads [171]: pass in
Do you have PPTP redirect enabled?
On 2/5/06, John Cianfarani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doing some testing with 1.0-BETA1-TESTING-SNAPSHOT-2-2-06 and whenever I
enable PPTP I get this error in the logs:
php: : There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:171:
syntax error pfctl:
Think I found the problem, the WAN interface didn't have a dhcp ip yet.
Thanks
John
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 5:19 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] PPTP Rule Error
Do you have PPTP redirect
I've added some code to prevent this from happening (breaking the ruleset).
Thanks for bringing it up.
On 2/5/06, John Cianfarani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Think I found the problem, the WAN interface didn't have a dhcp ip yet.
Thanks
John
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich
It seems like the [-v] option fixes the
non-existent logs issue (they show up now with the
show RAW logs checkbox selected), but the
formatted logs are still no-show. I see a
related regex statement in the
/usr/local/www/diag_logs_filter.php file (line 85)
is this the file responsible for
Yep, thats the file. The REGEX most likely needs to be reworked to
match the new -v output.
On 2/5/06, David Strout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems like the [-v] option fixes the
non-existent logs issue (they show up now with the
show RAW logs checkbox selected), but the
formatted logs are
Real mail clients don't care :)
--Bill
On 2/5/06, Holger Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is, it can break mailing list archives and start new topics
though it only is an answer to an already existing one. I'll keep it in
international settings for now until somebody is
I took a good look at it, I think that's a little
beyond my means to delve into trying to edit/alter
it to get formatted logging up and running.
I'm not sure thisd has solved the issue anyways, I
see the traffic show up in the non-formatted test
only from directed attacks on the WAN IP (eg: nmap
The captive portal works again under https thank you. FYI the
pfSense-Full-Update-1.0-BETA1-TESTING-SNAPSHOT-2-5-06.tar never upgrades
the current install it times out during upload process. I downloaded the iso
and did a full re-install and restored my backup to get it to work.
-Original
It should be a .tgz file so perhaps you're browser uncompressed the file.
On 2/5/06, Ronald Henriksen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The captive portal works again under https thank you. FYI the
pfSense-Full-Update-1.0-BETA1-TESTING-SNAPSHOT-2-5-06.tar never upgrades
the current install it times out
hello,
just one info for the developer's team
i'm runing on this release: 1.0-BETA1-TESTING-SNAPSHOT-2-2-06
i'have the same type of problems like David Strout about the logs. i
will experiment the method publied on this mailling list.
I am running 1.0b2rc5 and I am not seeing any firewall
Please try http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/1.0-BETA1-TESTING-SNAPSHOT-2-5-06/
On 2/6/06, parpalhon del riu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello,
just one info for the developer's team
i'm runing on this release: 1.0-BETA1-TESTING-SNAPSHOT-2-2-06
i'have the same type of problems like David
Please try
http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/1.0-BETA1-TESTING-SNAPSHOT-2-5-06/
hello,
just one info for the developer's team
i'm runing on this release: 1.0-BETA1-TESTING-SNAPSHOT-2-2-06
i'have the same type of problems like David Strout about the logs. i
will experiment the method
Please try
http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/1.0-BETA1-TESTING-SNAPSHOT-2-5-06/
i'm now on 1.0-BETA1-TESTING-SNAPSHOT-2-5-06 release, but the bug is
not correctly fixed... i haven't logs.
only a remote syslog server can read the firewall logs, on the pfsense
web gui it's impossible...
hi scott,
On Sun, 2006-02-05 at 14:56 -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
Thats interesting as dhcrelay now exists. Is it not running?
apparently not ...
i'm from the linux world and therefore am now getting my feet wet in
bsd. can you give me a command to check to see if it's running? tried ps
38 matches
Mail list logo
