I'd really like to see source NAT added. I've been used to pf on openbsd
for a while... it'll let you abuse nat any way you like it, and will still
call you the next day. I tried pfsense and actually really liked it a lot.
it was eventually the lack of options for NAT that made me switch back...
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 5:52 AM, Nenhum_de_Nos matheus...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, January 11, 2010 06:19, Chris Buechler wrote:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Nenhum_de_Nos matheus...@gmail.com
wrote:
hail,
I have a beta1 trial of pfsense as an ap on rum based tp-link device. I
to be honest, you ought to get something like Cacti running on an external
server. It's easy to deploy and configure. You'll get charts of all kinds
of info, and its only a few clicks to set up.
In order to run it you'll need to know a little about SNMP. But for
monitoring, quite honestly
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Matias matiassu...@gmail.com wrote:
El 01/06/10 18:09, Evgeny Yurchenko escribió:
Matias wrote:
El 01/06/10 17:14, Evgeny Yurchenko escribió:
Matias wrote:
El 01/06/10 17:00, Evgeny Yurchenko escribió:
Matias wrote:
Hi,
I've an internet connection on
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:14 AM, Chris Buechler cbuech...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Ian Bowers iggd...@gmail.com wrote:
I usually
reccommend a cisco router over a BSD box for WAN delivery duty since
they rarely if ever need patching
Cisco has put out more security
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Vick Khera vi...@khera.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Ian Bowers iggd...@gmail.com wrote:
My comment on patching was more abstract than saying Cisco is more of
a fire and forget box than BSD. a BSD box, even as a network
appliance, is going to have
darkstat will give you a rolling month, but I'm not sure what would
conveniently do traffic since the start of a given month.
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Adam Thompson athom...@c3a.ca wrote:
I’m trying to determine how much traffic I’ve transferred since the first of
the month; the RRD
You won't find much success in trying to block bittorrent with a firewall.
Your best bet is to use IDS (eg: snort) or another sort of categorization
software or appliance to identify who is using bittorrent and deal with them
at layer 8 via company security policy. Torrenting is one place where
:04 AM, suresh suresh
suresh.notion...@gmail.comwrote:
we can install the snort in pfsense 1.2.3?
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Ian Bowers iggd...@gmail.com wrote:
You won't find much success in trying to block bittorrent with a firewall.
Your best bet is to use IDS (eg: snort) or another
...@gmail.comwrote:
if we disable the bit torrent using traffic shapers.. bit torrent will be
block or what will happen.please help me
Thank you,
Regards,
Suresh
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Ian Bowers iggd...@gmail.com wrote:
pfsense is the freebsd, so one way or another you can install the snort
torrent or bit torrent automatically changes the port number start
downloading.please help me.
Thank you,
Regards,
Suresh
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Ian Bowers iggd...@gmail.com wrote:
savvy users will use a different port. if your goal is to say we block
bit torrent, this shouldnt
11 matches
Mail list logo
