I have started a supported hardware list (adapted from the freebsd list):
http://www.pfsense.com/index.php?id=37
On 7/15/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
D-Link DFE-580TX Quad NIC PCI Card
Sorry I have't been following some thread very well there has been some
Support for multiple WAN dhclient has been available for 2-3 weeks.
Has anyone tried this yet? I need some feedback on if this works or
not
Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
(/etc/dhclient-script,
...): No such file or directory
-Kyle Mott
Scott Ullrich wrote:
Couple of things:
1. rm -rf /usr/local/pkg/pf/*
2. Reinstall all packages
3. vipw from a shell prompt and add:
_dhcp:*:65:65::0:0:dhcp programs:/var/empty:/usr/sbin
not mean to send it
-Original Message-
From: alan walters
Sent: 22 July 2005 15:11
To: 'Bill Marquette'; Scott Ullrich
Cc: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] round robin on inbound nat
I have done some testing today with inbound NAT and carp
And round robin
I have 2 boxes at home, both on carp. Works fine. You sure your
outbound rules are setup correctly?
Scott
On 7/25/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On version 0.70.8 I had sync working and backup lan operational when the
master was down.
On veriosn 0.71 the sync works
On 7/25/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know this discussion is going on a bit. But I was wondering
If we really think it is practical using the method we are trying.
With a basic round robin configured on the firewall. The web servers can
be configured to use there own software
squid? Is
this going to make the kernel use more memory?
--Bill
On 7/24/05, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alright, I'll recompile the kernel with:
options MSGMNB=8192 # max # of bytes in a queue
options MSGMNI=40 # number of message
Its a known problem.
Thanks,
Scott
On 7/28/05, David Strout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Everyone,
I get the following line above the table when I
click on the PPTP tab on the Diagnostics: System
logs: PPTP VPN page.
/usr/sbin/clog: ERROR: log_file argument must be
specified. usage:
They are kept in pf tables. The table in question is captiveportal.
Try this command at a command prompt after you have some ppl auth'd:
pfctl -t captiveportal -T show
Scott
On 7/29/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just was reviewing the captive portal implementation.
On 7/29/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok thanks it looks ok for allowed IP's, is the rule the same for captive
portal clients that are being authenticated through the captive portal
or are they authenticated on there mac address
Yes
Use a dedicated carp / pfsync interface.
Scott
On 7/31/05, Randy B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know that CARP encrypts it's messages, but I'm using it to provide a
virtual IP on a network that I'd rather consider actively hostile. As
such, I'd like to eliminate any non-essential
HRM. Interesting. I'll check it out. May not be able to support
radius for PPPoE since its config is no different than PPTP.
On 8/1/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pppoe hangs on registing computer on network with radius enabled.
Nothing weird is in my radius server
All are planned changes for this coming weekend (hackathon).
Scott
On 8/1/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be good to have packages installed but not running for example
ntop. Can these be configured on boot or to be started when you want them
On 8/1/05, Paul Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a monowall development system... (A FreeBSD VM)... We used the
excellent guide in the Monowall docs about how to build your own monowall
images to create it... We've since added a SSH server that only allows
access via keys set in the
I have 10+ vpn's nailed up with 0 issues. I seriously doubt there is a bug.
Scott
On 8/1/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm still having problems with my vpns I have sad and spd entries at each
end on the tunnel but I cannot traceroute or use any other protocol . does
On 8/1/05, Paul Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comments below:
-Original Message-
Why not use a remote radius server that only the user can control?
We are trying to do this with as few boxes (and lowest $$) as possible. We
also thought the simple web interface of Monowall
Use the virtual IP function to add more addresses to any interface,
including WAN.
Scott
On 8/1/05, DLStrout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there any plans for assigning multiple IP addresses to the WAN
interface?
-
To
Use execraw.php to issues shutdown -h now
Scott
On 8/2/05, analyzerx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
halt system in the web admin? o_O?
On 8/2/05, Roger Miranda (Digital Relay) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
I have a PfSense Version Firewall in place but due to energy prices in
it's
On 8/2/05, David Strout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are the updates posted to the mirrors static or
are they updated based upon changes throughout the
day/multiday timeline.
They update throughout the day. Check the md5's.
A little clarity if I grabbed the 0.73.2
update last night and
If you can make this an option this would be a great addition. A
unified diff with the m0n0wall code changes should be enough for me to
integrate the code into pfSense.
Scott
On 8/2/05, Paul Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By default, captive portal will allow multiple logins using the
On 8/2/05, Paul Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am planning to make it an option - Either log them out, or allow
concurrency I hadn't thought of having it ask. I've also had
another suggestion to redirect them to a page that indicates their password
may have been
I would to help with this but I have to admit that this is a new
prospect for me. Let me know how it turns out and it would be nice
if we could document this behavior.
On 8/3/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok I have made a bit of progress with this one.
I have setup a vpn by
On 8/3/05, Paul Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've seen somewhere the multi-WAN works with DHCP on both WANs now, but will
it work with PPPoe on one interface and DHCP on the other? If so, is this a
failover situation by default (where one interface can be designated as a
primary), or for
The embedded images do not have VGA :)
Install from the ISO to the DoC.
Scott
On 8/3/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to get pfSense working on my EPIA setup with the
following configuration:
* EPIA PD1 (C3 1Ghz Nehemiah, dual LAN connection,
On 8/3/05, Charrua [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I have two Internet connections from two different ISPs. Connection A is
ADSL, connection B is another kind of broadband connection (LMDS). In the
ADSL link I have 1 public ip which changes dynamically, and in the B
connection I have 28
Or you could think of this as self tuning. From everything I can
gather it seems normal.
Scott
On 8/4/05, Chris Buechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/1/05, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[kernel: tl0: tx underrun -- increasing tx threshold to 512 bytes]
[kernel: tl0: tx
Fixed in CVS. Thanks.
On 8/4/05, Giorgio Ducci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm testing 0.73.6 on a Wrap board with an Atheros mPCI and when I
enable interface OPT1 (ath0) and I click on SAVE I get a new page
with this on the header:
Warning: fopen(/tmp//sbin/ifconfig_wireless): failed
Thats bizarre because I just logged into my primary firewall with
WinSCP without any modifications. In fact I remember spending many
days working on this exact problem!
Scott
On 8/4/05, Paul Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got pfSense installed and working today, but the SSH access it
Here's an update on the usb keyboard status. In a nutshell, known problem:
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/errata.html
31 Oct 2004, updated on 5 Nov 2004) For FreeBSD/i386 and
FreeBSD/amd64, when installing FreeBSD 5.3 using an USB keyboard the
keyboard will stop working once the kernel
I have started a booting wiki page at:
http://wiki.pfsense.com/wikka.php?wakka=BootOptions
Please feel free to expand it.
Scott
On 8/4/05, Chris Buechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/4/05, Paul Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Success!
Nice!
We added the hint to the
All that is required (supposed to be) for USB is usbd which is running.
On 8/4/05, Paul Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're actually wondering if there is something that starts after the
interface assignments are complete that brings the keyboard support back.
Since we modified our
assignment script again... Keyboard doesn't work.. I'm guessing
that something is starting after that script completes that causes the USB
keyboard to start working...
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 1:54 PM
0.73.6 is the latest
On 8/4/05, Paul Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
0.73.4.1
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 2:09 PM
To: Paul Taylor
Cc: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] USB Keyboard on 73.2
Are you configuring the networking and its able to talk to the network
before installing?
On 8/4/05, David Strout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Everyone,
Reported earlier that the
/FreeSBIE/scripts/install.sh loads fine. As the
first few lines pass by it states that the
Backend is Loading, but
Contact the authors of freeradius then. This setup would be no
different from freebsd in the back of your room running the same
configuration!
On 8/5/05, Paul Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While looking through the config.xml file to see if I could spot anything
unusual (to
If this is happening then your hitting some big giant locked area of
the freebsd kernel. I haven't personally seen this issue but I have
noticed that sometimes during filter reload operations the console
keyboard stops responding which reminds me of your issue. Just a
complete guess.
Scott
On
Not to mention I have to stress that this is no different from running
free-radius in a non pfSense environment. Your real beef is with the
freeradius authors, not us.
Scott
On 8/5/05, Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/5/05, Paul Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill,
This whole argument is pointless. If this is really this big of a
problem you have these choices:
1. Dont use freeradius and use a seperate server where you will be
entering these configs in _PLAIN TEXT_ as well.
2. Dont use pfSense
Scott
On 8/5/05, Paul Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for cross posting but I wanted to make everyone aware that the
lists will be going offline for the weekend as the developers
hackathon is starting today.
Please hold all bug reports, etc until after monday of next week.
Would also like to thank everyone that has donated to the hackathon.
Found one more issue. Look for the fixes in the next version. Not
sure when it will be out however.
On 8/8/05, denny halim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i just tried the latest 0.73.8 pfsense.
still same error.
??
On 8/4/05, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fixed in CVS
On 8/8/05, David Strout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[useless stuff snipped]
I also notice scrolling ALERTS about an error
parsing the /tmp/rules.debug
What line in /tmp/rules.debug and what does the line say? Thats the culprit.
What does line 248 of /cf/conf/config.xml show?
On 8/8/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
following error occurs when trying to add a new ipsec tunnel version 0.74
XML error: not well-formed (invalid token) at line 248
Please open a ticket for this item at
http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/tktnew and include as much info as
possible.
On 8/8/05, Marcin Jessa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
Enabling your custom NAT rules and then chosing Save for Enable advanced
outbound NAT will reenable default NATing rules.
Please open a ticket for this at http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/tktnew and
include as much info as possible.
On 8/8/05, Giorgio Ducci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi to all,
I'm testing 0.74-embedded on a WRAP 1E board. In INTERFACES: OPT1
when I set the SSID name and I desactive the hide SSID option
Thank us in a week when all the bugs are worked out.
Scott
On 8/8/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well just thought to say thanks to the fine work you all achieved in the
weekend while we sat in the sun and supped martinis'
Big pats on the back, even though they
If you are running 0.74 I would highly suggest to 0.74.2. There was a
really interesting XML parser bug that was really wrecking the pf
rules file in certain cases.
Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
I have a Mitel 5020IP phone that I run over IPSEC to work. It works
fine. I honestly cannot speak of the other things you mention.
Scott
On 8/8/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know this is a difficult question but I would like to know wheaether there
is any
Native support
On 8/10/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I feel that it is the same bug or very similar to the one that was in
0.74 when it first came out. When you create an ipsec tunnel it trashes
it also when you add a block rule to the firewall on an optional
interface the rules crash.
I will
Send me your /tmp/rules.debug file to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scott
On 8/10/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The this that the pope server is not working on the optional interfaces on
0.74.6 on a wrap board. But it think it is to do with the rules errors we
have discussed and not
Not sure what to tell you. It works fine for me.
Scott
On 8/10/05, David Strout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My fat finger ... yes it is the 0.74.4 ISO that I
tried
I tried all of the 0.73.x versions prior to this.
Sorry for the mis-communication.
- Original Message -
Subject:
That version had bugs. Upgrade to the latest.
Scott
On 8/11/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Am having some problems with the Traffic Shaper Wizzard
on 0.73.8.
At the final stage of the wizzard when the changes are
applied we see a page of PHP error message which is
This has been reported before but I have not been able to reproduce the problem.
Scott
On 8/11/05, Yves Fortin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I seem to be having some issues installing pfsense with at least the 4 last
iso
images. After typing installer, there is a brief blue screen (not
On 8/10/05, Giorgio Ducci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi to all,
I installed 0.74.6 on a 1E Wrap board. Some minor bugs:
- on Interfaces==OPT1(Atheros wireless) the Hide SSID option is missed?!
Option was removed. It hides the SSID from the end user and does not
hide the SSID from wireless
We are working on this. Everyone please be patient. The installer
is a tricky piece to get right for such a broad range of hardware and
such.
Scott
On 8/11/05, Wesley Joyce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm in the same boat as well on Dell GX 110's. I have followed the 'upgrade
solution' of
All, are you using SCSI by chance?
Scott
On 8/11/05, Wesley Joyce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm in the same boat as well on Dell GX 110's. I have followed the 'upgrade
solution' of installing 0.68.x and upgrading from there.
-Original Message-
From: William Pflaumer
Try running:
/usr/local/bin/lua50c51 /usr/local/share/dfuibe_lua/main.lua \
dir.root=/FreeSBIE/ \
option.booted_from_install_media=true
... From a shell prompt. Do you get a lua error?
Scott
On 8/11/05, David Strout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just tried a fresh 0.74.6 install
] wrote:
I am going to try the latest ISO with a GX110 using the IDE HD and then SCSI
and let you guys know.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 3:00 PM
To: David Strout
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; support
On 8/12/05, Wesley Joyce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am now only getting as far as 63% during the install when the CDROM is on
the secondary bus. This is using pfSense-LiveCD-0.75.1 which for some
strange reason still boots and display 0.75 as the version. Should I
download this from a
On 8/12/05, David Strout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
It hangs STILL on the Waiting for Backend screen and I tried running the
lua cammand that Scott had me try last night and get a different set of
messages, but it still hangs and I have to CTRL-C out (twice).
Send me the messages.
Scott
This is not the correct fix. Try this /etc/inc/vpn.inc.
http://pfsense.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/pfSense/etc/inc/vpn.inc?rev=1.69;content-type=text%2Fplain
On 8/12/05, M. Kohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
small hint abut IPSec bug (I hope...):
(pfSense 0.75)
The function
?
To: Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: support@pfsense.com
During the cpdup command processing after the partitioning, formatting, it
faults at the 63% progress indicator during the installation.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 12
Same problem as reported a few hours ago. Try the vpn.inc that I
asked the other person to try.
On 8/12/05, Wesley Joyce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After disabling the default LAN rule I immediately got this notice.
System log from web gui
Aug 12 12:13:41 php: There were
Check your DNS? It works fine here.
Scott
On 8/12/05, Mike Sr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am running version 0.75 upgraded from 0.74.8 and in either version I am
unable to see any packages. It says Unable to retrieve package info from
www.pfesnse.com. Cached data will be used.
The solution here is to set the filter dirty flag in the squid startup
script. This will force the rules to be reloaded and then squid will
be running.
I'll take care of it shortly.
Scott
On 8/16/05, Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Albert, can you file a ticket on this at
rather hard to enforce, no?
Scott
On 8/17/05, Randy B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott Ullrich wrote:
I just tested the latest vpn.inc with my home firewall that has 4+
ipsec links and it works fine.I'll be releasing a new version
soon. Please be on the lookout for it and give it a try
concerned of the Squid process dying for
any reason and the rdr rule for transparent proxying
is still in effect. This will block http traffic to
the internet. Any solution for this?
Thanks again.
Miles
--- Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The solution here is to set the filter
...
/bkw
On 8/17/05, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SQUID should not be dying. If it is then I need to deactivate the
package until a new one is released on the freebsd site.
Scott
On 8/16/05, Albert Miles Enabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No need to file a ticket. Thanks
pfctl -vvvsr from a command prompt (or status.php) lists the rules
with rule numbers.
On 8/17/05, Roy Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running pfsense 0.77.
Getting messages like the following:
pf: 140737 rule 111/0(match): block in on fxp2: yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy.4685
Is this a fresh configuration?
On 8/18/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know about this I still am seeing problems with ipsec
Auto generated rules being wrong and an empty tunnel still being made
with 0.77.
I know this is nothing to do with the above problem but 0.77 is
it adds a blank tunnel again.
And creates rubbish rules.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 August 2005 20:42
To: alan walters
Cc: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] ipsec and 0.77
Is this a fresh configuration?
On 8/18
Outgoing load balancing is not ready yet.
On 8/19/05, Moacyr Leite da Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
Need tips for outgoing load balance and source routing with pfsense and 2
and 3 WAN connections.
I tryed to config this scenario com with 2 pfsense box and with 1
The embedded images lack video, keyboard and mouse support. Perhaps
the best solution is to install using the cdrom installer to the
compact flash directly then editing /etc/platform to read wrap.
Scott
On 8/19/05, Jamy Klein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I noticed there are images for running
On 8/19/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are two ways to remake the error that I found.
(1) create a new firewall rule and apply it.
[click to toggle enabled/disabled status]* * * *
* TestRule
I added the rule above. No issues.
(2)
Firmware upgrade bug lurks from within.
I would avoid it at all costs. 0.79 will be published soon.
Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Squid is being worked on right now. I would avoid it.
On 8/21/05, Jason Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I get the following error trying to install squid:
Parse error: parse error, unexpected T_VARIABLE in
/etc/inc/pkg-utils.inc(424) : eval()'d code on line 1 Fatal error:
Call to
-Original Message-
From: Bastian Schern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 August 2005 23:02
To: Scott Ullrich
Cc: alan walters; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] There were error(s) loading the rules
I think I did nothing with the IPSec rule. But is there a way to get the
FW
You cannot ping proxy-arp'd ips unless there are 1:1 NAT setup.
Is this how your forwarding or using port forward?
Scott
On 8/22/05, Bastian Schern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm using pfSense Version 0.79.2 and my Virtual IPs are not functional.
--- snip ---
virtualip
I'll check it out. I really need to rip out the interfaces crap and
redo it completely. But no time and a feature freeze. GRR.
On 8/23/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems that if you put a wireless card in the lan there is no option to make
it a hostap only bss and ibss.
On 8/23/05, Tobias Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
when trying to use the captive portal on 0.79 there is a strange thing.
Following ports work without authentication:
MySQL, smtp, ping, ssh, name. Others I didn´t check.
m0n0wall (1.2b9) doesn´t show this behaviour.
Is this a bug or
If so, you need to do an update for a file I just commited.
From the shell type:
update_file.sh /etc/inc/services.inc
Now reboot each firewall.
Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Please try 0.79.4 and report back if you have had problems with
previous LiveCD's.
Thanks!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thats strange. The wizard should not reappear unless you change
interface assignments. Im curious why the interface assignment
screen is being tripped on reboot. Does it happen every time? If
so I'll need to somehow duplicate your configuration and figure out
what logic to ignore when
Please try 0.80 which is making its way to the mirrors. If this
fails, please try:
http://wiki.pfsense.com/wikka.php?wakka=BootTroubleShooting
Thanks!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
The interface must be enabled and configured to show up.
Scott
On 8/24/05, Dan Swartzendruber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was looking at the setup screen, and it doesn't look like it will
let me pick the OPT1 interface (which is where my guest WLAN will
come in on...)
On 8/25/05, Dan Swartzendruber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know if this is something I'm doing wrong. Using the default
pfsense captive portal page, I defined a test user and
password. Unfortunately, even if I deliberately enter something
wrong, I get no error indication, and my
I have just commited a change for this. Please test on 0.80.4
On 8/25/05, Dan Swartzendruber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, it doesn't seem to work at all. Here's what I'm seeing:
1. I'm allowed to pass whatever traffic I feel like before being
authenticated.
2. When I launch the
What kind of NICS?
On 8/26/05, Ted Crow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, versions 0.80-0.80.2 installed without *too* much trouble, and my
remote network can now see the WAN and OPT interfaces.
One thing I did notice with 0.80 and 0.80.2 is that my firewall hangs
for about 5 minutes during
0.71? Thats OLD.
Please download a 0.80 series iso.
On 8/26/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:47 AM 8/26/2005, Dimitri Rodis wrote:
This wouldn't happen to be a repeat of the cdrom on the same channel
issue, is it?
Well, it's a virtual CDROM, but it happens to be on a
.
At 12:05 PM 8/26/2005, Scott Ullrich wrote:
How much ram do you have? 128 is the recommended minimum.
On 8/26/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:53 AM 8/26/2005, Scott Ullrich wrote:
0.71? Thats OLD.
Please download a 0.80 series iso.
No, .71
On 8/26/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only LiveCD's that I found on 4 different sites were
pfSense-LiveCD-0.80.iso, with no minor version appended. After looking at
4 sites, I stopped trying to find any more versions.
According to my System:Firmware:AutoUpdate page:
Please send me the contents of /tmp/ after a failed install attempt.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks
On 8/26/05, Simon SZE-To [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I've tried the latest ISO installer, but my problem still here as I send to
this list a week ago.
Below is my mail has been sent
On 8/26/05, Chris Buechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yeah, if that's the controls you want applied to authenticated
clients. Sounds like that's a bug though. Scott or someone will have
to comment there.
Chris is absolutely correct.
I'll drag all the equipment back out tomorrow and retest
On 8/27/05, Robo.K. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
i have a question.
Where in settings of traffic shaper can i set up the bandwidth ?? A don`t
want use a EZshaperWizard, where is able set up only one item for upload and
one item for download.
I wan to create various pipes as in Monowall.
On 8/30/05, Tomas Hodan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it looks like it's not.
such situations are very common, that firewall for what every reason will
loose power.
Yes, thats pretty obvious, isn't it?
If it is not, then this is a bug.
Scott
On 8/30/05, Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interestingly the WRAP image is supposed to be mounted read-only anyway.
Only /cf should normally get mounted r/w and then only for changes.
Actually it writes RW during boot giving a chance for any now defunct
packages to readjust the
On 8/31/05, Rodolfo Vardelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Marquette ha scritto:
standard soekris 4801 + 2 lan
traffic? in that moment zero
and it happens only with carp+load balance with two boards
When you say load balancing do you mean arp balancing?
Scott
There was a bug in previous versions that would send the machine into
a interrupt storm due to a route bug. Your on a later version than
this so I really dont know what to say here.
Scott
On 8/31/05, Rodolfo Vardelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott Ullrich ha scritto:
sorry, I meant
Perhaps block this rule on the LAN interface before the ALL all?
On 8/31/05, Rodolfo Vardelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott Ullrich ha scritto:
What was generating the traffic?
it was a normal broadcast to port 137-138 in network 9.0 that for some
strange reason pass to other network
Pureftpd is not intended for a firewall installation. It was created
because I run a number of FTP servers and I want a clear and easy way
to get them setup.
Scott
On 9/2/05, Dan Swartzendruber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe I'm doing something wrong. I have the ftp proxy active, since
if
Does /etc/localtime exist? This is strange since we haven't made any
changes to the TZ code since importing m0n0wall.
On 9/1/05, Simon SZE-To [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Seems that the time of System logs: Firewall is not following the time zone
settings. I have tried config. time
1 - 100 of 2009 matches
Mail list logo
