[pfSense Support] Relativelly long ping to Pfsense on local direct connection.

2005-09-16 Thread Robo.K.
Version 0.84.6 If I have connected computer /Celer 2.4Ghz, 256MB RAM, 100Mbps 3COM TX interface/ directly to test computer via crossover cable, or both are in some switch, ping time response is from bellow 1ms to 9-10 msand abou 700 - 900ms if i go to the menu, for example Traffic shaper.Is

Re: [pfSense Support] Relativelly long ping to Pfsense on local direct connection.

2005-09-16 Thread Bill Marquette
On 9/16/05, Robo.K. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Version 0.84.6 If I have connected computer /Celer 2.4Ghz, 256MB RAM, 100Mbps 3COM TX interface/ directly to test computer via crossover cable, or both are in some switch, ping time response is from bellow 1ms to 9-10 msand abou 700 - 900ms

Re: [pfSense Support] Relativelly long ping to Pfsense on local direct connection.

2005-09-16 Thread Bill Marquette
On 9/16/05, Robo.K. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know that kernel in monowall 4.xx is faster than 5.xx used in PFSENSE. But from this For the archives. pfSense uses FreeBSD 6, not FreeBSD 5. --Bill

Re: [pfSense Support] Relativelly long ping to Pfsense on local direct connection.

2005-09-16 Thread Scott Ullrich
ping is about the must ugliest speed test I have ever heard of. use ipperf. there are discussions of this in our archive. And for the record freebsd DOES do ICMP rate limiting. Scott On 9/16/05, Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/16/05, Robo.K. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: