Re: [SURVPC] PCDOSDRDOS, and some Win95 too.

1999-12-29 Thread Charles Dye
Or Botton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well, the P350 is alive again! insert cheesy lightning effect here. "Now all I need is a brain." "Yes, Herr Doktor Gatesenschtein! At once!" This time i'm planning to use PC-DOS 2000 instead of MS-DOS 6.22 (which I'm going to keep on a boot-disk. You may

Re: [SURVPC] lan

1999-12-08 Thread Charles Dye
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Besides, dammit, I haven't had the time to screw around with yet another thing lately. I had no intention of even thinking about linux before the millenium! I'm desperately seeking work, terrified and depressed and anxious, volunteering all over to

Re: [SURVPC] what now?

1999-12-01 Thread Charles Dye
Bob George [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hah! I'm the true SurvTool guy here. Always carried my trusty SAK "Tinker" (Swiss Army Knife) right next to the SRU (Screw Retrieval Unit -- that long "claw" thingie for grabbing little things in tight places)! Redundant. The Victorinox "Tinker" has a

Re: [SURVPC] Winter time

1999-11-01 Thread Charles Dye
Lars-Einar Jansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yesterday Sweden and the rest of Europe moved their clocks one hour backwards. It is "normal" time again. Summertime is over or, as you Americans call it, if I'm not wrong, Daylight Savings Time. [snip] However, I also happen to run Windows 95 on

Re: [SURVPC] Help! I have a Cardinal 14400 modem and no documentation

1999-10-13 Thread Charles Dye
"Samuel W. Heywood" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have recently acquired a Cardinal Technologies 14400 modem, model number 10750. I have no documentation. Cardinal Technologies went out of business a couple of years ago and of course no longer provides technical support. I should like to

Re: [SURVPC] gone FISHing

1999-09-01 Thread Charles Dye
Or Botton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: hm.. i've been thinking. Maybe such a server software should support LFN by using the method that 4DOS uses? (using a file called descript.ion , not by messing with the FAT.) Explanation for people who dont understand what i'm talking about: A certain shell

Re: [SURVPC] FAT backup

1999-08-13 Thread Charles Dye
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED] asks: First, thank you people for the idea to attempt to reconstruct the destroyed P350 C: partition by using the backup FAT. I didnt do it yet, but as far as I saw from testing software, the backup FAT seems to have the data intact. It worth a shot.. But I

Re: [SURVPC] INTERLNK Puzzle

1999-07-12 Thread Charles Dye
hammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Two questions: Did anyone do a systematic comparison between Interlnk/Intersrv and the DR-DOS Filelink ? The latter is (still in v.7.02) restricted to COM1 and COM2 in serial mode, a serious disadvantage; same thing on parallel (only two ports allowed).

Re: [SURVPC] We have had their future....

1999-06-01 Thread Charles Dye
At 12:00 AM 6/2/99 +, Or Botton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just came to my mind in the begining of 1999, when I figured out that we're now in all the "really sci-fi related dates". Most of the sci-fi stories happen around 1999 or 2000. So guess what? The future is NOW! lol. You're just now

Re: [SURVPC] Runtime Error Messages???

1999-05-25 Thread Charles Dye
At 12:00 AM 5/25/99 +, Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does ANYBODY have any experience with DOS RUNTIME errors??? This is driving me nuts because since my last upgrade, I can no longer run some of my most useful DOS utility progs. I am talking VERY SMALL DOS apps that always give me a

Re: [SURVPC] stupid question

1999-04-20 Thread Charles Dye
Ben A L Jemmett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 'Foobar' is basically the same thing - however, don't get it confused with FUBAR which has an ever so *slightly* different meaning. From which "foo" and "bar" almost certainly derive, however... BTW, does anyone have a URL for a recent edition of the

Re: [SURVPC] parallel port null modem

1999-04-16 Thread Charles Dye
Or Botton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: hammer wrote: Only it says, on parallel port, that there is a wiring scheme for a (null-modem-like?) cable "in the documentation" - Filelink.exe contains a good built-in help, though the wiring is not indicated there; and there is no additional doc file,

Re: [SURVPC] Bill Gates Heaven or Hell?

1999-04-11 Thread Charles Dye
Dale Mentzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Bill Gates died in a car accident. He found himself in Purgatory being sized up by God. "Well, Bill, I'm really confused on this call. I'm not sure whether to send you to Heaven or Hell." You know, I've seen this story before. Only the punchline was

Re: [SURVPC] Sorry, Travis....

1999-04-09 Thread Charles Dye
"Chad A. Fernandez" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F.no L X V or I un less you mean something else?? How many sides does a hexagon have? [ObComputers] The original, *correct* name for the base-sixteen number system is "sexadecimal." IBM couldn't stand this name

Re: [SURVPC] Survivor e-mail configuration

1999-04-02 Thread Charles Dye
Ole Juul [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi All, I found that I could use my "legacy" 4 banger (Sharp Elsi Mate EL-220) calculator to send mail. Oh yeah. I tried that once, but I found that a Casio TeleMemo 30 is really more pleasant to use for email. It has the letters on the keypad, and there's

Re: [SURVPC] When the bits byte

1999-03-17 Thread Charles Dye
Bjorn Simonsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: COMING TO TERMS WITH BYTES Computer terminology is becoming more precise: the International Electrotechnical Commission, which creates standards for electronic technologies, is adopting new prefixes to describe data values. The new term "kibibyte" will

Re: [SURVPC] Chips In Spaaaaaaace!

1999-03-15 Thread Charles Dye
Or Botton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Skylab lost its happy thoughts and fell out of the sky long before there was a 486. So what did it had? I don't know. Possibly some kind of Intel or Zilog chip, but maybe not anything we'd recognize today. (I am told, however, that early space shuttles

Re: [SURVPC] Bill Gates - a good story? (was Bill Gates -the poor kid)

1999-03-15 Thread Charles Dye
P o p [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ...So Bill gets his name and address and the limosine whistles off. A few days (?) later this kind man is in his local bank, making a payment on his mortgage, and the bank teller says "you have nothing owing, Bill Gates came in and payed the $10, 000 (?) owing on

[SURVPC] Swatch Time

1999-03-14 Thread Charles Dye
Ole Juul [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes re. Swatch Time: Besides, I don't know about the idea of changing to base 10 for time measurement. If it should be changed to fit in better with computers and the internet, perhaps base 16 would be more practical. Anyway, I could rant for a long time about the

[SURVPC] Perils of ScanDisk

1999-03-14 Thread Charles Dye
Bernie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes re: Disk compression trivia The biggest problem with 6.0 (and all after) is that ScanDisk is included. this has trashed several good working floppys for me, and even taken a piece of my hardrive (w95 starts it every time that I have to close Win with Crtl-Alt-Del

[SURVPC] Chips In Spaaaaaaace!

1999-03-14 Thread Charles Dye
Or Botton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes re: new box? On 10 Mar 99 at 18:55, Bernie wrote: This is the reason that NASA aren't using any faster CPU than 386 in space, the newer will much more easily be destroyed while out there. Actually, I heard it was a 486 laptop that serves as the

Re: [SURVPC] Disk compression trivia

1999-03-14 Thread Charles Dye
Ben A L Jemmett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: instead of pressing Control-Alt-Delete got nasty surprises. (Yes, me too.) Well I've always used INT 19h - or is it 18h? - which SmartDrive should hook. Hopefully. Ought to. Still, I'd throw in an INT 21/.AH=0D just to be on the safe side. MS-DOS

Re: [SURVPC] why a surv. PC?

1999-03-14 Thread Charles Dye
Or Botton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes re: why a surv. PC? Well, I really do need the multi-tasking features.. About the windows multi-tasking, the bad side is that it will multi-task better Windows programs. Unfortunatly, you cant run more then one DOS programs in most Windows 95 installs i've

[SURVPC] Disk compression trivia

1999-03-13 Thread Charles Dye
Ben A L Jemmett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: OK... MS-DOS 6.0x had DoubleSpace (algorithms stolen from Stac, no decompress option, very unreliable). Yes. However, I'll point out that the majority of the problems reported with MS-DOS 6.0 (trashed disks) were not caused by DoubleSpace, but by

Re: [SURVPC] Dos drivers for soundcards

1999-01-29 Thread Charles Dye
Constant Brouerius van Nidek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Looking for a DOS driver for my Yamaha OPL3-SAX soundcard I finaly found the Yamaha site with seemingly drivers which I may use. As downloading was very slow and finaly broke down I would like to know if what I think I found is really