Hi,
On Sunday, 26 November 2006 08:47, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Currently, the PF_FREEZE process flag is used to indicate that the process
should enter the refrigerator as soon as possible. Unfortunately it is set
by
the freezer while the process may be changing its flags for another
Hi,
On Sunday, 26 November 2006 08:44, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
The discussion in a recent thread on Linux-PM has indicated that it's
necessary to call pm_ops-finish() before devce_resume(),
but enable_nonboot_cpus() has to be called before pm_ops-finish()
(cf.
Hi,
On Sunday, 26 November 2006 11:02, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 26 November 2006 08:47, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Currently, the PF_FREEZE process flag is used to indicate that the process
should enter the refrigerator as soon as possible. Unfortunately it is
set by
Hi,
On Sunday, 26 November 2006 12:15, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 26 November 2006 11:02, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 26 November 2006 08:47, Pavel Machek wrote:
--snip--
Okay, I'll use atomic_t.
Patch with atomic_t follows.
The atomic_set(..., 0) are used to avoid
Hi!
Okay, I'll use atomic_t.
Patch with atomic_t follows.
The atomic_set(..., 0) are used to avoid the (theoretical) situation in which
freezing might be decreased twice in a row and I've decided to explicitly
initialize freezing in fork.c for clarity.
Looks okay to me, but I'm not
Hi!
Index: linux-2.6.19-rc6-mm1/kernel/power/process.c
===
--- linux-2.6.19-rc6-mm1.orig/kernel/power/process.c 2006-11-25
21:26:52.0 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc6-mm1/kernel/power/process.c 2006-11-26
Hi!
Since pm_ops-finish() has to be called after enable_nonboot_cpus() and before
device_resume(), from the userland interface perspective it should be treated
as a part of the atomic suspend and resume operations. For this reason we
need two additional ioctls to be called instead of
Hi!
SMP boxes (especially on i386 ones), please do so and tell me if there are
any problems.
The last patch is untested.
I guess I should fix s2ram enough that it works for you... What is the
primary notebook you are using?
HPC nx6325. Someone has reported he's managed to
I have solved the keyboard problem compiling as module i8042, and
unloading it before suspend to ram.
In addition I have found that without unloading the i8042 (or using it
as builtin), if the network card is not connected, the IRQ associated
to keyboard and touchpad (controlled by i8042) are
I had the same problem with my hp compaq nx7400 notebook. Same errors!
With my old acer 2012wlmi I had no problems with hdd password, perhaps
the bios doesn't lock the disk on suspend to ram...
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash.
Hi,
On Sunday, 26 November 2006 22:31, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
SMP boxes (especially on i386 ones), please do so and tell me if there
are
any problems.
The last patch is untested.
I guess I should fix s2ram enough that it works for you... What is the
primary
Hi,
On Sunday, 26 November 2006 20:51, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Since pm_ops-finish() has to be called after enable_nonboot_cpus() and
before
device_resume(), from the userland interface perspective it should be
treated
as a part of the atomic suspend and resume operations. For
Hi!
If frozen is atomic_t, do we need memory barrier?
I think so. For example on x86-64 atomic_read() is just a read.
I'm not sure, but for x86-64 barriers are nops, anyway, IIRC.
@@ -128,6 +135,21 @@ static unsigned int try_to_freeze_tasks(
} while_each_thread(g, p);
Hi!
Maybe we should add SNAPSHOT_WITH_FLAGS (uint)
RESTORE_WITH_FLAGS (uint)
with one of those flags being USE_PLATFORM_MODE? We may need more
flags in future...
Sure, we can do that.
Okay, that works for me ;-).
...or maybe have ioctl(fd, USE_PLATFORM_MODE)?
On 11/26/06, Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
===
--- linux-2.6.19-rc6-mm1.orig/include/linux/sched.h
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc6-mm1/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1065,6 +1065,9 @@ struct task_struct {
#ifdef
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 06:24:10PM +0200, sir_j wrote:
hi Stephan.
If you keep the suspend-devel list cc-ed, you might even get faster answers
:-)
Could show me full string for suspend-devel list ?
suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Hm, this looks like either you are not running as
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 12:25:00PM +1100, Jim wrote:
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 12:05:06PM +0100, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
Yes. Just one question: does it also work from the console or only
from X?
Works from both.
Hiccup on the console. When it resumes, the console is double spaced,
i.e.
17 matches
Mail list logo
