Hi,
I have some questions about this text in Documentation/power/swsusp.txt:
* If you touch anything on disk between suspend and resume...
* ...kiss your data goodbye.
It's obvious that this is a bad idea but I'm interested in the details.
I'm working with the
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Daniel Drake wrote:
Hi,
I have some questions about this text in Documentation/power/swsusp.txt:
* If you touch anything on disk between suspend and resume...
*...kiss your data goodbye.
It's obvious that this is a bad idea but I'm
2006/11/28, Stefan Seyfried [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 10:43:51AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Daniel Drake wrote:
Hi,
I have some questions about this text in Documentation/power/swsusp.txt:
* If you touch anything on disk between suspend and
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 17:37 +0100, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
He just has to look at the end of the first page of the swap partition
for the signature :-)
So it is a good idea to tell the engineer to do mkswap on the swap
partition before putting the disk into the replacement hardware.
Thanks
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 08:06:03PM +0100, Emilio Scalise wrote:
In suspend2 (now I will get flamed...) there is a nice feature that
warns that you are trying to resume with a wrong kernel, that lets you
reboot the machine without losing anything
I won't flame you. It just does not help if
On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 22:39 +0100, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
I have no objections and am not really a Makefile specialist, but is
this necessary?
I am building our package with
make ARCH=%_arch \
SUSPEND_DIR=/usr/sbin \
CFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -Iliblzf-1.6 -Lliblzf-1.6 \
Please consider this small patch, it would have made understanding my
first failed attempt at using uswsusp easier.
--
Daniel Drake
Brontes Technologies, A 3M Company
Print resume device file path if it can't be found
From: Daniel Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: suspend/resume.c
On Tuesday, 28 November 2006 21:20, Daniel Drake wrote:
Please consider this small patch, it would have made understanding my
first failed attempt at using uswsusp easier.
Looks good.
I'm going to apply it if there are no objections.
Greetings,
Rafael
--
You never change things by fighting
Hi,
On Monday, 27 November 2006 00:09, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 26 November 2006 20:48, Pavel Machek wrote:
--snip--
@@ -128,6 +135,21 @@ static unsigned int try_to_freeze_tasks(
} while_each_thread(g, p);
read_unlock(tasklist_lock);
yield();
