On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 01:50:12 +0300
Alon Bar-Lev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The question is: Why cannot I switch from one vt to another during image
write?
I guess some lock out somewhere at freeze something...
I will be glad to be able to switch from silent to verbose modes
during image
On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 07:46:40 +0300
Alon Bar-Lev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/21/07, Tim Dijkstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No. The vbetool code is linked in. It doesn't run as regular processes.
At the time we do those hacks, we are the only not-frozen part of userspace.
This is what makes
Hi,
What do people think about this?
---BeginMessage---
I have an old system (eMachine 433MH) with a new external USB drive
(which is actually faster than the internal hard drive that came with
the box). It takes a few seconds for the Linux to bring it online, due
in some part I think to a 5
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007 13:56:25 +0200
Stefan Seyfried [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 10:51:38PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
Hi,
I thought it was useful to be able to get the exit status from s2ram --test.
Yes, sounds sane. Maybe we should return failure for those UNSURE
Hi,
I thought it was useful to be able to get the exit status from s2ram --test.
grts Tim
Index: s2ram-ppc.c
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/suspend/suspend/s2ram-ppc.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -r1.1 s2ram-ppc.c
--- s2ram-ppc.c 13
On Thu, 31 May 2007 18:24:43 +0200
Stefan Seyfried [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
the first hunk fixes s2ram -n, without it does not print what hacks would
actually be applied.
The other hunks let s2ram complain louder about machines that are still
UNSURE. The fedora guys made pretty bad
On Sun, 20 May 2007 15:27:18 +0200
Stefan Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rafael wrote:
Actually, on x86-64 you have to compile it with
$ make BACKEND=x86emu
Seife, perhaps we should add this information to README?
It is already clearly documented in the HOWTO.
Yes please, or add
On Sun, 20 May 2007 21:02:23 +0200
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday, 20 May 2007 20:31, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
On Sun, 20 May 2007 15:27:18 +0200
Stefan Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rafael wrote:
Actually, on x86-64 you have to compile it with
$ make
On Thu, 17 May 2007 11:59:37 +0200
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday, 17 May 2007 00:14, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
Hi,
I've got an report of a laptop that works with
s2ram --vbe_save --vbe_post
But doesn't for s2both with the same options.
What does work
Hi,
I've got an report of a laptop that works with
s2ram --vbe_save --vbe_post
But doesn't for s2both with the same options.
What does work however is
s2both -a 1
Somehow the difference in code path in s2both is significant from that of
s2ram (which basically does echo mem
On Tue, 15 May 2007 12:55:04 +0200
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 May 2007 08:40, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
Makefile:
1.57 (tdykstra 13-May-07): ARCH := $(shell uname -m | sed -e
s/i.86/x86/ -e s/ppc.*/ppc/)
x86_64 not supported? Suspend builds
On Sun, 13 May 2007 22:52:37 +0200
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday, 12 May 2007 22:18, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
Hi,
OK, it turns out that my last patch for adding comments to usage had a
horrible bug. Although (struct option_descr) would yield a (struct option
Hi,
OK, it turns out that my last patch for adding comments to usage had a
horrible bug. Although (struct option_descr) would yield a (struct option),
as anticipated, the increment of the pointers of these structs ofcourse
wouldn't...
Anyway the patch below fixes this, although also in a bit
On Thu, 10 May 2007 22:17:29 +0200
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- } else if (!splashy_open()) {
+ } else if (!(error = splashy_open(mode))) {
I'd prefer
error = error = splashy_open(mode);
if (error) {
and analogously below.
huh?
Why is that?
grts
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:20:51 +0200
Stefan Seyfried [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 12:25:24AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Saturday, 21 April 2007 00:14, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
Hi,
S2ram could also use the usage() function from config.c to display its
message
On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 21:18:46 +0200
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday, 22 April 2007 11:40, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 22 April 2007 01:02, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 23:14:48 +0200
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday, 21
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 23:14:48 +0200
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday, 21 April 2007 22:36, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 11:30:22 +0200
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday, 21 April 2007 00:59, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
Hi,
I'm
Hi,
I'm trying out sdisk with a swap file.
$ cat /proc/swaps
FilenameTypeSizeUsedPriority
/dev/hda2 partition 979956 189972 -1
/local/tmp/swapfile file1048568 0 -2
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:37:53 -0500
Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 12:47:49AM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Neil Brown wrote:
On Tuesday April 3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[]
After the power cycle the kernel boots, devices are discovered,
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 02:36:12 +0200
Luca Tettamanti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@@ -27,7 +27,16 @@
int s2ram_do(void)
{
int ret = 0;
- FILE *f = fopen(/sys/power/state, w);
+ FILE *f;
+
+ /* If this works we're done. Else we just continue as if nothing
+* happened,
by default, can be overridden).
PPC code is based on original patch from Tim Dijkstra.
Signed-Off-By: Luca Tettamanti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Makefile| 22 +++-
s2ram-ppc.c | 75
s2ram-ppc.h |2 +
3 files
on original patch from Tim Dijkstra.
I haven't looked to closely at it, I can't access my machine right now.
But this patch doesn't seem correct. IIRC, s2ram_hacks is called before we
really suspend the system, but the ppc version would. I'll take a closer
look tomorrow night.
Signed-Off-By: Luca
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007 21:32:39 +0200
Stefan Seyfried [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#define suspend_error(msg, args...) \
do { \
- fprintf(stderr, suspend: msg Reason: %m\n, ## args); \
+ fprintf(stderr, %s: msg Reason: %m\n, my_name, ## args); \
} while (0);
What is this do { }
Hi,
A while back I proposed a patch to support powerpc. The comments where
that it was a bit ugly with all those #ifdef's. Now the question is how
do I do this neatly?
Of all the functions in s2ram there is only one that would be really
duplicated. Then there is main() en a few functions that we
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 15:20:56 +1000
Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday April 3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've got a bugreport [0] from a user trying to use raid and uswsusp. He's
using initramfs-tools available in debian. I'll describe the problem
and my analysis, maybe
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007 00:39:04 +0200
Cédric Boutillier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all !
Thanks to Alan Stern's help on usb-devel list, I have a working
suspend-to-disk. My USB issues seem to have gone away thanks to his
patch.
That is good news.
I need to unload (resp. reload) some modules
Hi,
I've got a bugreport [0] from a user trying to use raid and uswsusp. He's
using initramfs-tools available in debian. I'll describe the problem
and my analysis, maybe you can comment on what you think. A warning: I only
have a casual understanding of raid, never looked at any code related to
Hi,
I polished the patch a bit. I found one additional problem; also `-s'
was already in use by both s2disk and s2ram. This let me to decide not
to allow any short options for the `s2ram hacks' in s2both. For s2ram
they are still supported. If however we would start using the usage
function from
On Sun, 01 Apr 2007 10:15:22 +0200
Johannes Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 22:17 +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
Hmm, ok I misunderstood then. I thought that in our previous tests
you said it used echo mem ... maybe you were using your patches;)
Yes, I do of course run
Cédric Boutillier schreef:
Hi !
summary
Cedric gets a `colorful' screen and no suspend when using
echo mem /s/p/s, but using the ioctl on /dev/pmu works OK
/summary
On 3/30/07, Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which version of the suspend utilities do you use?
Well, I do not
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:37:52 +0200
Cédric Boutillier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have not seen any message from resume. I unpacked the initramfs
using your script: everything seems in place:
./etc/uswsusp.conf
And has the same contents as the one in your regular /-partition, right?
Just
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 00:28:07 +0200
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday, 29 March 2007 00:14, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 23:11:41 +0200
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
diff -u -r1.70 suspend.c
--- suspend.c 16 Mar 2007 16:02:22 -
Op Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:58:10 +0200
schreef Stefan Seyfried [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2) Also pass the short option string to usage and check for each
`val' if it is included in the short option string. At first I
thought this was a bit overkill, but thinking about it, it is more
correct...
Op Thu, 29 Mar 2007 23:54:13 +0200
schreef Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Okay, so the patch works. Tim, if you don't mind, I'd like to apply
this one.
Sure, go ahead. If I read it right the cast is now done when calling
set_swap_file().
---
suspend.c |2 +-
1 file
Hi Cédric,
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 23:03:12 +0200
Cédric Boutillier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I reboot after having executed s2both, I see the following message:
Invalidating stale suspend image or something similar (I cannot find
it in the logs though). I don't know if this helps
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 23:11:41 +0200
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
diff -u -r1.70 suspend.c
--- suspend.c 16 Mar 2007 16:02:22 - 1.70
+++ suspend.c 27 Mar 2007 20:36:52 -
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@
swap.offset = offset;
error = ioctl(dev,
Hi,
Any further question to Jérémie before we can add it to the whitelist?
grts Tim
Jérémie Delaitre op Wed, 28 Mar 2007 10:57:30 +0200
Package: uswsusp
Version: 0.6~cvs20070202-1
The Samsung Q35 is not in the whitelist of s2ram but
Hi,
This is a first cut at supporting powerpc for s2*. For the s2ram bit it
basically removes the vbetool code. This has two reasons. First, there
isn't a powerpc version of libx86 yet. Second, the machines that have
support for s2ram in the kernel don't need those hacks.
As you noticed, I've
Hi.
Sometimes it seems relevant for the thing calling s2both to know what
route we took in the end, be it s2ram or s2disk.
Would you think returning a value is a suitable way of communicating
that to the user? Would some scripts maybe break, because they only
expect 0 in case of success?
grts
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 11:55:03 +0200
Luca Tettamanti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/27/07, Tim Dijkstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a first cut at supporting powerpc for s2*. For the s2ram bit it
basically removes the vbetool code. This has two reasons. First, there
isn't a powerpc
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:11:34 +0200
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 March 2007 11:51, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
Hi.
Sometimes it seems relevant for the thing calling s2both to know what
route we took in the end, be it s2ram or s2disk.
Would you think returning
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:23:44 +0200
Cédric Boutillier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi !
Apparently, resume_dev = 268462812 before calling set_swap_file().
I've no idea where these 0:0 come from, but I do have idea why it doesn't
work. I don't know how to fix that right now, though.
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 21:18:17 +0200
Cédric Boutillier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi !
Tim said:
Apparently it should be an `unsigned long long', which would make
printf(blkdev: %llu \n, blkdev); the correct way to print it.
héhé ! I got a non zero result !!! Thanks Tim ! (Should I be
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 11:07:59 +0200
Stefan Seyfried [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
after reading this thread, i got the impression that we do not report
errors verbosely enough. I mean - we normally never see those messages,
but if we do, due to an error having happened, we always need to
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 13:29:15 +0100
Stefan Seyfried [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
(sending a new mail, so that it does not get lost in the old thread)
If nobody objects, i will rip out the libx86 build option from the
Makefile. I will not do this today or tomorrow, but as time permits
(or
Hi Cédric,
First of all, thanks for testing! I'm cc-ing the suspend-devel list
maybe they can chime in if they have some idea...
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 17:03:34 +0100
Cédric Boutillier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi !
I compiled successfully uswsusp on my iBook (mid 2005), and installed
the
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:40:02 +0100
Johannes Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Tim,
I gave it a try now...
Here are a few things:
- compression is totally messed up on my machine, it writes about 8% of
the image and then gets an -ENOSPC error from the compression
algorithm (I put
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 23:53:37 +0100
Tim Dijkstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 22:43:37 +0100
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hm, well. I think that if we don't ship something, we should not have the
option to compile it in our Makefile.
Instead, we should
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 08:56:45 +0100
Stefan Seyfried [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 10:21:16PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
I can't see how people can `depend' on it. Especially since this is
only in CVS since a few days. Also libx86 isn't in CVS anymore so they
will
Hi,
I just noticed I have misunderstood how the machine is put in S3 for
s2both. I thought it would use a function from s2ram.c to do that, but
it seems it uses
ioctl(snaptshot_fd, SNAPSHOT_S2RAM, 0);
Just to be sure, this will probably do precisely the same thing as echo
'mem
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:38:43 +0100
Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue 2007-03-20 11:37:36, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
Hi,
I just noticed I have misunderstood how the machine is put in S3 for
s2both. I thought it would use a function from s2ram.c to do that, but
it seems it uses
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 22:43:37 +0100
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hm, well. I think that if we don't ship something, we should not have the
option to compile it in our Makefile.
Instead, we should update the documentation to tell the users that they
should obtain the thing
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 22:21:16 +0100
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hm, I think I misunderstood the issue.
Can anyone please explain to me what the current situation is and why it may
be a good idea to change it (or not)?
libx86 is a dependency of vbetool. Since the new release of
Hi,
Our diff to VBETool 1.0 is virtually non-existent, the only
'significant' change is the do_get_mode / __get_mode change.
Can't we persuade Matthew to take these changes? than we can just point
at vbetool code and drop it from out repository.
Then maybe I can persuade him to create a
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:08:27 +0100
Christian Axelsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Seyfried wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 05:28:00PM +0100, Christian Axelsson wrote:
Hello!
Im trying to resume from disk om my dell 420 but after suspending (using
s2disk) and passing
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 12:33:24 +0100
Stefan Seyfried [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
i need these for a chrooted build (where $DESTDIR is not always present
before make install):
--- Makefile
+++ Makefile
@@ -137,10 +137,10 @@
fi
install-resume:
- install --mode=755 resume
Hi Guys,
I just got this report
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 18:19:59 +0100
Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: uswsusp
Version: 0.3~cvs20060928-6
Severity: wishlist
Hello Tim,
With etch-amd64 on my new laptop, s2ram work fine with that option:
#s2ram -f -a 1
Here the laptop
Hi,
Could someone please tell me what (stable) kernels have support for:
a) Suspend/Resume with swap files
b) Platform mode instead
And is there a easy way to test for swap file support, some /sys entry
perhaps?
Thanks,
Tim
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 13:28:16 +0100
Stefan Seyfried [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
b) Platform mode instead
I'm not sure what you mean here ...
i guess it is SNAPSHOT_PMOPS...
Ah, yes. The 'instead' is a remnant of a larger sentence that I cut out
saying something like 'instead of
Hi,
Here is my shot at a new Makefile. What do you think?
grts Tim
===
#CONFIG_COMPRESS=yes
#CONFIG_ENCRYPT=yes
#CONFIG_SPLASHY=yes
#CONFIG_UDEV=yes
#CONFIG_RESUME_DYN=yes
SUSPEND_DIR=/usr/local/sbin
RESUME_DIR=/usr/local/lib/suspend
CONFIG_DIR=/etc
Hi,
While adding the loglevel.[ch], I've got a bit annoyed with the
makefile, it has duplication of stuff all over it. I'm planning to
clean it up a bit. Some question before I do that.
Doe any body mind if I rename the target
install-resume = install-resume-on-initrd
and
+1,63 @@
+/* loglevel.c - routines to modify kernel console loglevel
+ *
+ * Released under GPL v2.
+ * (c) 2007 Tim Dijkstra
+ */
+
+#include unistd.h
+#include stdio.h
+#include errno.h
+#include sys/types.h
+#include sys/stat.h
+#include sys/mount.h
+
+
+static FILE *printk_file;
+static int
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 18:48:30 +0100
Michal Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Consider adding this one too. It makes RSA_data itself much smaller. Not
all RSA components need to take 512 bytes:
Yes I noticed this too, but it didn't seem relevant at the time. Patch
looks good.
grts Tim
Split the opening of resume_dev and retrieval of the header from
read_image into a new function. That way we can do something else if
everything is OK, but there just isn't an image.
The new function return ENOMEDIUM in case of no image, better
suggestions welcome.
diff -u
Hi,
Here is an updated patch:
Index: splash.c
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/suspend/suspend/splash.c,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.4 splash.c
--- splash.c18 Sep 2006 12:00:09 - 1.4
+++ splash.c10 Jan 2007 11:43:45
Hi,
I just noticed that the new version of the Makefile installs resume
in /usr/sbin (or whatever you configured $(DESTDIR)$(SUSPEND_DIR) to be).
Is there any reason to do that? It's not that you would be calling it by
hand on a normal running system...
Of course you need the binary on initrd or
Hi,
To be able to abort suspending while using splashy, we have to move the
abort logic to the splashy struct so it can be overridden when
libsplashy is used for splashy support.
OK to commit?
grts Tim
Index: splash.c
===
RCS
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:43:46 +0100
Stefan Seyfried [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 01:49:44PM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
Please insert my machine in the whitelist.
#s2ram -i
This machine can be identified by:
sys_vendor = FUJITSU SIEMENS
sys_product = D1547
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:26:01 +0100
Stefan Seyfried [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 05:01:49PM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
You are right of course. This of course means that the matching as done know
is broken.
It is incomplete as i would put it :-)
I haven't tried
Op Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:53:46 +0100
schreef Stefan Seyfried [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
BTW, what is the first kernel with the correct code? It's not in
2.16.18, is it? Ah, I see they just released 2.6.19, is it in there?
I think it is (i pushed it through Andrew), but i have not checked it.
grep
Hi guys,
If the kernel doesn't have support for platform mode, uswsusp complains
loudly.
suspend: pm_ops-prepare returned error -1
suspend: Snapshotting system
...
suspend: Saving image data pages ...
suspend: pm_ops-enter returned error -1, calling power_off
These are harmless messages,
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:09:02 +0100
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Wednesday, 29 November 2006 11:59, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
Hi guys,
If the kernel doesn't have support for platform mode, uswsusp complains
loudly.
suspend: pm_ops-prepare returned error -1
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 12:26:45 +0100
Stefan Seyfried [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the framebuffer is really a problem, it might of course be that Tim just
never tried it with a framebuffer driver.
I don't remember. I will check this when I get my hands on this laptop again.
grts Tim
Op Thu, 2 Nov 2006 08:07:36 +0100
schreef Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
The appended patch allows the users of suspend to abort the image
saving by pressing Ctrl+c.
Comments welcome.
This is not going to work for splashy. We will need wrap the call to
'read' in the splashy
Op Thu, 2 Nov 2006 16:10:04 +0100
schreef Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thursday, 2 November 2006 14:49, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
Op Thu, 2 Nov 2006 08:07:36 +0100
schreef Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
The appended patch allows the users of suspend to abort
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 17:20:39 +0100
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday, 2 November 2006 16:55, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
Op Thu, 2 Nov 2006 16:10:04 +0100
schreef Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thursday, 2 November 2006 14:49, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
Op Thu, 2 Nov
On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 23:15:15 + (UTC)
Matej Cepl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason Lunz scripst:
Yes, it works just fine. I've been running a laptop with dm-crypt on
swap and root for months now - only /boot is unencrypted.
That's cool -- more I am thinking about that more I don't
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 13:26:16 +0200
Matej Cepl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
is something like this possible? I have here notebook with Fedora Core
5 with swap encrypted using cryptsetup create. Is it possible to
suspend/resume such notebook with ususpend?
Dunno much about encrypted swap,
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 00:43:55 +0200
Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Unfortunately I now have only a little time for programming due to my work
on the university, but I hope to be less busy around 11 November, so I'd
like
to make a release at that time.
That's a good idea. I
On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 20:39:22 +0200
Stefan Seyfried [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
good. I'll wait for some mor ACKs before committing, so whoever knows
something about consoles or had something to do with splash code, please
take a look at that patch. Thanks.
Looks good to me. It's mostly moving
On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 14:51:31 +0200
Stefan Seyfried [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 10:30:25PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
Just curious; why do you ever want to do s2ram instead of s2disk?
I meant s2both, duh...
It's a waste of battery power.
s2ram only takes about
Hi,
Many people have udev, which will make /dev/snapshot dynamically if
support is available in the kernel. And if it didn't, making it from the
Makefile wouldn't be a solution because it would disappear on the next
reboot.
This patch adds another CONFIG option to the Makefile to not make
Hi,
Here's a new version of the patch:
Index: suspend.c
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/suspend/suspend/suspend.c,v
retrieving revision 1.52
diff -u -r1.52 suspend.c
--- suspend.c 14 Sep 2006 14:18:58 - 1.52
+++ suspend.c 16 Sep
Hi,
Three small cleanups:
- Remove s2both binary at 'make clean'
- Remove unused #define
- Add \n to message, looks better imho.
Index: Makefile
===
diff -u -r1.36 Makefile
--- Makefile14 Sep 2006 14:58:21 - 1.36
+++
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 11:06:36 +0200
Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
This patch will lock the VT that is active just after splash is
initialized and release it just before the splash system is stopped.
I haven't tested it extensively with bootsplash.org, but it seems to
work
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 22:15:09 +0200
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday, 15 September 2006 21:39, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 11:06:36 +0200
Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
This patch will lock the VT that is active just after splash
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 17:10:18 +0200
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-(a) [optional] If you want to use the compression and/or encryption
-capabilities of the suspend tools and you have installed the necessary
-packages referred to in subsection 2), you need to set
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 11:33:52 +0200
Stefan Seyfried [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also tried to make the use and ordering of -c and -o to $(CC) a bit
more consistent throughout the Makefile.
Any objections?
Why don't you use something like
vbetool/vbetool.o: vbetool/vbetool.c
On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 22:49:57 +0200
Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun 2006-09-03 21:06:12, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
Hi,
If I can count, than PARAM_NO is of by one;)
GEN_PARAM is defined as 8, which is correct because there is no
#ifdef SPLASH_CONFIG anymore. SPLASH_PARAM still
Hi,
Christian can't get s2ram to work to work with a 2.6.17 kernel, although
it is in the whitelist. It used to work with 2.6.16. Do you now of any
regressions?
Could anybody give him a hand in trying to get it to work again?
In the mean time I asked him to try with minimal number modules
Hi,
With the libc6-dev in current debian sid, I need to include linux/fs.h
to compile. Else gcc will complain
swsusp.h:141: error: SYNC_FILE_RANGE_WRITE undeclared
This problem was hidden by the fact that that constant is defined
in swsusp.h if SYS_sync_file_range was not, which wasn't
Hi,
I got a bug report in the debian BTS which is beyond my knowledge.
Could one of you shed some light on the issue?
Thanks,
Tim
Forwarded message:
Machine: IBM Thinkpad R50p
I recognized following issues concerning s2ram/s2disk/s2both:
- calling s2ram works fine, resuming from RAM
On Fri, 7 Jul 2006 14:44:19 +0200
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 07 July 2006 14:30, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jul 2006 13:25:20 +0200
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Apparently we have used wrond console ioctls around freeze
Hi all,
As you all know by now I'm perfecting my debian package of uswsusp.
Debian currently supprts on the order of 10 archs. In was wondering
what archs are supported by uswsusp. I guess the s2ram bit is powerpc,
i386 and amd. But for s2disk you more or less only need swap, right?
Does
Hi,
I added my machines to the whitelist.c. One is a desktop system, 's2ram
-n' only identifies it with the bios version. Also the work around is
likely to be only necessary because of the video card (nvidia riva tnt)
I use, isn't it? So I don't know if it is wise to add it. Seems like a
Hi,
At the moment I'm making a debian package for suspend/uswsusp. Suspend
has an an option for encrypting which make use of the libssl library.
Unfortunately linking libssl into an GPL application makes the
resulting binary undistributable (see [0] for more info.). Of course
this is not a
96 matches
Mail list logo
