Thanks. Martin Brook, Biofuel.
Winny De Schryver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Diester oil is a commercial name
for biodiesel. It is a german company
WDS
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Levent Yuceer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: donderdag 26 juni 2003 7:49
Aan:
David and Winny
Thank you both very much.
levent yuceer
- Original Message -
From: David Teal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuels-biz@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 5:06 PM
Subject: Re: [biofuels-biz] diester oil
Levent,
Diester is a confusing name. The 'di' part has
Thanks Winny.
Just goes to show that you can't leave a perfectly good generic chemical
name kicking around without someone registering it as a trade name!
Diester oil is a commercial name for biodiesel. It is a german company
WDS
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Levent Yuceer
Hello Barry
Does anyone have any dealings with new car warranties when it comes
to using biodiesel or vegetable oil as the main fuel? I would be
interested in hearing any pros and cons concerning this subject. In
particular, does using biodiesel void any of the engine, fuel or
drivetrain
Hi all
I wonder if anyone can advise.
I've installed a form on my website which I've had to link to an .asp doc
to get the input mailed back to me. It's almost working but I'm
receiving the following error and wonder if anyone can help.
Microsoft VBScript compilation error '800a0401'
Dear Graig
Look under BOC Edwards from Yahoo. I do have a
virtually new supply of QDP 40's at $7000 each.
Regards
Mark
Want to chat instantly with your online friends? Get the FREE Yahoo!
Messenger
YES SIRS: FOR BUSH IMPEACHMENT !!! NOW
- Original Message -
From: Kris Book [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 6:17 AM
Subject: [biofuel] Fwd: Fw: Impeach Bush! Echoes Through Bush Fundraiser
- Forwarded Message
Verified emission reductions for using biodiesel vary from 0 to 47%
for PM and CO, 0-67% for HC, and -10% to 0% for NOx, depending on
biodiesel content in the blend and the type of application.
[]
Biodiesel verification
http://www.epa.gov/otaq/retrofit/techlist-biodiesel.htm
While all of
Neoteric Biofuels Inc wrote:
Check the p/w ratio on these puppies! (go to development)
http://www.wankel-rotary.com/
Yee-haa
Yowza!
Look at the applications too. Another to add to my (growing) list of
diesel aircraft engine manufacturers. The only problem I see with it
is the
Alan,
I have been driving the wankel driven sport car, Japanese.
Do not remember what brand at the moment, it will come,
One of the thing I did remember was the high fuel consumption,
I was told that wankel was thirstier than piston engines.
Hakan
At 01:14 PM 6/30/2003 -0400, you wrote:
Sorry to be late in on this, but I'm playing catch-up and could not resist
the invitation in this post.
robert luis rabello wrote:
Production rates at this power level are generally considered
insufficient,
which is why commercial electrolysis occurs above thermoneutral voltage.
Mazda.
Hakan
At 07:30 PM 6/30/2003 +0200, you wrote:
Alan,
I have been driving the wankel driven sport car, Japanese.
Do not remember what brand at the moment, it will come,
One of the thing I did remember was the high fuel consumption,
I was told that wankel was thirstier than piston
Hakan,
Mazda was best known Japanese producer for Wankels.
Around here Wankels were noted for superb power, wide torque band and high fuel
consumption. I believe that is why AMC dropped them from the Pacer (which was
originally designed for a Wankel) when the OPEC petro pinches hit in the
Can I get some help with these simple calculations?
US petroleum consumption is 19.65 Million Barrels per day, or about 7
Billion barrels per year.
(http://www.bts.gov/publications/national_transportation_statistics/2002/htm
l/table_04_01.html)
If we could get 2 barrels (88 gallons) of biofuel
Hydrogen is like the fairy tales. To make 10 kW of Hydrogen from renewable
source like electrolysis of water, you need 9 kW of electricity.
FWIW:
1. I think many environmentalists are making somewhat of a wrong call on
Hydrogen, seeing it as almost entirely bogus. I think it shows promise
Hakan wrote:
Mazda.
Hakan
At 07:30 PM 6/30/2003 +0200, you wrote:
Alan,
I have been driving the wankel driven sport car, Japanese.
Do not remember what brand at the moment, it will come,
One of the thing I did remember was the high fuel consumption,
I was told that wankel was
MM,
The numbers are not wacky, but they are the best I could find. Most other
numbers show that it take more electricity than you get out.
I am not saying that Hydrogen as such is a scam and that we could
not find it viable in the future. What I say is that it is at the moment used
as a
That's like .02 us gal per sq ft
Ken
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's Important Questions.
I think the main potential for mathematical error here is in the
conversion
of barrels of petroleum to various fuels (and other products), some
of which
aren't necessarily replaceable by biofuel.
For example, from a single barrel of crude oil (and the 19.65MM
bbl/day
figure includes other
Just to clarify, I am a biofuel advocate. I have been for a couple of years
now. In my view, BioDiesel is part of a Bio-Fuel solution, but the real
benefit gained from bio-fuels is the closing of the carbon loop. In other
words, by using fuels derived from carbon recently taken up, rather than
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 21:04:54 +0200, you wrote:
MM,
The numbers are not wacky, but they are the best I could find. Most other
numbers show that it take more electricity than you get out.
First: *All* such conversions, from electricity to any sort of liquid or gaseous
substance containing the
MM,
Please
At 02:14 PM 6/30/2003 -0700, you wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 21:04:54 +0200, you wrote:
MM,
The numbers are not wacky, but they are the best I could find. Most other
numbers show that it take more electricity than you get out.
First: *All* such conversions, from electricity
Do these numbers look right?
Nope. You're not looking between the cracks.
1) A petroleum barrel (bbl) is 42 US gallons, not 44.
2) Not all crops yield the same amount of oil.
3) Most oilseed crops also yield feed meal that is edible for both animal
and human consumption. No one is going to
Gasification plant in Stuttgart, Arkansas, USA
http://www.primenergy.com/WhoPays.htm
http://www.primenergy.com/projects_detail.asp?id=11
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
Save up to $400 on all
Hey, I love the Lupo, but frankly, the thought of being on the same road
as
a 6000 pound SUV going 80 to 90 MPH, well, that's a little bit scary to
me!
What? They didn't teach you how to use a rear view mirror in Driver's Ed,
nor how to continually monitor it several times a minute?
If not,
I am not going to sign up for the Drive 55 thing, although I do think I support
some conservation efforts. We drive places because we need to. It may not be
life or death if we do this at 65-77 mph (about what I and many others average),
but those speeds are factored into virtually everything
Second: Your figures are in power instead of energy. You have quoted kW
instead
of kWh.
I have done a mathematically correct simplification. The time factor can
and should
be excluded, if it is the same. You will have a hard time with me, if you
argue this.
Here is what you said:
...To
Hello,
Just joined the group. My name is Kent McKay, and I am a distiller of organic
essential oils in Costa RIca and Canada. I also build stills for other eco
based
projects and have been asked to put a quote together for a Mayan community
still in Guatemala. They are interested in using
80 - 90 MPH for any vehicle is scary, it don't matter how much it weighs at
that point, it is going to turn someone into goo if things go wrong.
Greg H.
- Original Message -
From: Tim Castleman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 30,
MM,
So this is the only correct definition,
Power is kW(s) per second and energy is kWh per hour?
Anything else is absolutely wrong?
cannot energy be kWm per minute?
The only defined is power Watt/second, if we keep to Watt.
If I want to specify energy, I could do it in kWyear or any
This is quite interesting to say the least.
Here is what you said:
...To make 10 kW of Hydrogen from renewable source like electrolysis of
water,
you need 9 kW of electricity
Please define a renewable resource called electrolysis of water. I am unable
to determine this as a renewable
Well, I think there are two issues here.
1. First, I think you simply reversed numbers by accident. If I understand you
correctly (and I may not) you meant to convey that there was a 10% loss in
energy going from electricity to hydrogen, in the most optimistic electrolysis
process possible.
http://www.globalhemp.com/News/2003/June/appeals_court_rejects_dea.html
Monday, June 30, 2003
Appeals court rejects DEA bid to outlaw hemp foods
David Kravets, Associated Press
SAN FRANCISCO, California - A federal appeals court on Monday overturned a
U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration ban
First off, many thanks for the correction on the capacity of a barrel, which
in fact could be anywhere from 31 to 42 gallons liquid, but then even that
actual amount could change somewhat if we consider Imperial gallons rather
than US.
There is a variety of barrels established by law or usage.
34 matches
Mail list logo
