We Stand for Peace & Justice
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005
We Stand Statement from ZNet
From: "Michael Albert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
At the start of the Iraq War ZNet posted a web page featuring what we
called the We Stand Statement. The statement quickly inspired over
90,000 online signatures as well as 25,000 more collected in pen and
ink by the Zapatistas in Mexico.
Responding to Bush's second inauguration, to the on-going war in
Iraq, and to injustice more broadly, we have put the We Stand
statement back online at http://www.zmag.org/wspj/index.cfm
We hope that if you didn't sign "We Stand" earlier you will sign it
now. We hope you will tell others about it, discuss the content with
them, and urge them to sign it as well.
At the page at http://www.zmag.org/wspj/index.cfm you can see the
statement and supporting materials. You can display signers by
country or by their name, and of course you can sign up yourself if
you haven't already.
The We Stand Statement is not just anti war. It isn't even just about
dissent. "We Stand" offers positive aspirations to inspire positive
projects.
Immediately below is the "We Stand" statement. Directly below that is
a multi author short article written to promote the statement when it
first went online. Please take a look at both the statement and the
article. If they resonate with you, please visit ZNet to sign up!
===
We Stand for Peace and Justice
(This is the statement we hope you will sign)
"I stand for peace and justice.
I stand for democracy and autonomy. I don't think the U.S. or any
other country should ignore the popular will and violate and weaken
international law, seeking to bully and bribe votes in the Security
Council.
I stand for internationalism. I oppose any nation spreading an ever
expanding network of military bases around the world and producing an
arsenal unparalleled in the world.
I stand for equity. I don't think the U.S. or any other country
should seek empire. I don't think the U.S. ought to control Middle
Eastern oil on behalf of U.S. corporations and as a wedge to gain
political control over other countries.
I stand for freedom. I oppose brutal regimes in Iraq and elsewhere
but I also oppose the new doctrine of "preventive war," which
guarantees permanent and very dangerous conflict, and is the reason
why the U.S. is now regarded as the major threat to peace in much of
the world.
I stand for a democratic foreign policy that supports popular
opposition to imperialism, dictatorship, and political fundamentalism
in all its forms.
I stand for solidarity. I stand for and with all the poor and the
excluded. Despite massive disinformation millions oppose unjust,
illegal, immoral war, and I want to add my voice to theirs. I stand
with moral leaders all over the world, with world labor, and with the
huge majority of the populations of countries throughout the world.
I stand for diversity. I stand for an end to racism directed against
immigrants and people of color. I stand for an end to repression at
home and abroad.
I stand for peace. I stand against this war and against the
conditions, mentalities, and institutions that breed and nurture war
and injustice.
I stand for sustainability. I stand against the destruction of
forests, soil, water, environmental resources, and biodiversity on
which all life depends.
I stand for justice. I stand against economic, political, and
cultural institutions that promote a rat race mentality, huge
economic and power inequalities, corporate domination even unto
sweatshop and slave labor, racism, and gender and sexual hierarchies.
I stand for a policy that redirects the money used for war and
military spending to provide healthcare, education, housing, and jobs.
I stand for a world whose political, economic, and social
institutions foster solidarity, promote equity, maximize
participation, celebrate diversity, and encourage full democracy.
I stand for peace and justice and, more, I pledge to work for peace
and justice."
===
That's the statement we hope you will sign if you haven't already.
Here is the multi-author article that got it all started, including a
list of those who signed it.
===
We Work for Peace & Justice
Building a movement powerful enough to stop the war in Iraq or to
successfully curb a next war in Syria or Iran or Venezuela, involves
many factors. Among these, and perhaps the most fundamental, is
sufficient numbers.
To successfully challenge those in power, our movement must
constantly grow in numbers as well as consciousness and commitment.
We must reach out to people who are against the war, but who have not
yet acted on their beliefs. We must reach out to people who are
troubled by what they are witnessing, but who have not yet decided to
oppose the war and the policies behind it. We must reach out as well
to those who now support the war, but without full knowledge of the
context, history, and implications.
A key task therefore, in addition to demonstrating, is to talk to
people, to hear their misgivings, their confusions, and their
insights, and to provide an alternative viewpoint able to generate
critical solidarity that can last. We need to address the people
whose addresses we don't have. We need to go door to door in
neighborhoods and dorms, and we need to do it over and over. We need
to talk to coworkers on the job, to people who we encounter during
the day shopping, to our neighbors, and to the person next to us in
class or in church or wherever we may be. We need to organize.
On a larger scale, our collective efforts can also reach out to
audiences beyond our current membership. Our marches can go through
neighborhoods instead of only downtown. People on the marches can go
and talk with those who will inevitably be drawn to watch such
events. Thousands of groups can go into shopping areas and set up
tables and then talk to those in the area. Talk. Talk. That is the
foundation of building larger demonstrations, deeper commitment, and
raising costs for elites, and thus winning change.
If 100 or 500 or 5,000 or 50,000 people or more are ready and willing
to block streets or obstruct buildings as a means of pressuring
elites in a context where support is growing, that's wonderful,
especially when the targets are part of the war machine, as in the
efforts to block military trains in Europe. But shouldn't as many
people, the next day, or the day before, or both, be willing to
spread out and talk to the population, facilitating their becoming
actively involved as well?
Our demonstrations create a context that facilitates reaching out to
organize the populace, but as important as they are, marches,
rallies, and obstructions won't by themselves do that organizing. To
hear views and to change minds requires that we listen and then
convey evidence, arguments, and also sympathy and respect for where
people are at. It takes talk.
To win against this war, the next war, and the causes of war and of
injustice more broadly, we need to assemble tens of millions of
active, committed movement members. But even if we continually talk
to those who disagree with us, how can we know what we are
accomplishing, and what can be our point of entry?
A possible technique would be for all of us, worldwide, to go to
people with a statement for them to sign -- something that's timely
but that won't grow stale, something that is concrete and specific,
but that is also universal enough for international use and thorough
enough so that to get signatures we will have to address all the
issues that obstruct people becoming actively involved in a growing
movement for peace and justice.
Maybe something like this:
[And inserted here was the We Stand Statement as it appears above...]
Article Co Signers and Initial We Stand Signers,
Ezequiel Adamovsky, Argentina
Vittorio Agnoletto, Italy
Christophe Aguiton, France
Michael Albert, USA
Tariq Ali, England
Bridget Anderson, England
Katherine Anger, England
Jessica Azulay, USA
David Bacon, USA
David Barsamian, USA
Phyllis Bennis, USA
Elena Blanco, Venezuela
Nadine Bloch, USA
Bill Blum, USA
Peter Bohmer, USA
Patrick Bond, South Africa
Jeremy Brecher, USA
Michael Bronski, USA
Dennis Brutis, South Africa
Paul Buhle, USA
Nicola Bullard, Thailand
Scott Burchill, Australia
Leslie Cagan, USA
Alex Callinicos, England
Daniel Chavez, Netherlands
Noam Chomsky, USA
Tim Costello, USA
David Cromwell, England
Will Doherty, USA
Brian Dominick, USA
David Edwards, England
Barbara Epstein, USA
Laura Flanders, USA
Bill Fletcher, USA
Eduardo Galeano, Uruguay
Susan George, France
Ted Glick, USA
Gie Goris, Belgium
Andrej Grubacic, Serbia
Marta Harnecker, Chile
Betsy Hartman, USA
Tom Hayden, USA
Evan Henshaw-Plath, USA
Doug Henwood, USA
John Hepburn, Australia
Edward Herman, USA
Pervez Hoodbhoy, Pakistan
Sut Jhally, USA
Robert Jensen, USA
Boris Kagarlitsky, Russia
Naomi Klein, Canada
Jerry Kloby, USA
Sonali Kolhatkar, USA
Saul Landau, USA
Joanne Landy, USA
Rahul Mahajan, USA
Dawn Martinez, USA
Elizabeth, Martinez, USA
Antonio Martins, Brazil
Rania Masri, USA
Bob McChesney, USA
George Monbiot, England
Hector Mondragon, Colombia
Suren Moodliar, South Africa
Jonathan Neale, England
Chris Nineham, England
Adele Oliveri, Italy
Pablo Ortellado, Brazil
Cynthia Peters, USA
Justin Podur, Canada
Vijay Prashad, USA
Prabir Purkayastha, India
Milan Rai, England
Nikos Raptis, Greece
Michael Ratner, USA
Judy Rebick, Canada
Tanya Reinhart, Israel
Carola Reintjes, Spain
Arundhati Roy, India
Marta Russell, USA
Manuel Rozental, Colombia
Lydia Sargent, USA
Roberto Savio, Italy
Stephen Shalom, USA
Paul Singer, Brazil
Norman Solomon, USA
James Tracy, USA
America Vera-Zavala, Sweden
Hilary Wainwright, England
Peter Waterman, Holland
Mark Weisbrot, USA
Robert Weissman, USA
Tom Wetzel, USA
Tim Wise, USA
Howard Zinn, USA
_______________________________________________
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel
Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
