Hello Kim
hey keith...you're one really smart guy so why reaffirm someone
I didn't. Kris has his own argument with Paul. I agreed with Kris
about unsupported opinionating, and that it's not a good idea to take
on the moderator's role (though not with how he put it). My message
was to point
On Tue, 20 May 2003 12:08 am, Keith Addison wrote:
Hi Todd
Another proponent of acceptable risk I see.
hang on. That's stretching it a bit, don't you think?
I am a proponent of the social contract, the idea that a society is not a
bunch of individuals, nor a state devoid of individualism,
My ability to discuss, or argue, knowledgeably about chemistry is about
zero. I was, however, very glad that the original piece, about the
truckload
of aluminium dioxide, got posted. Because now, when I buy toothpaste, or
for example, deodorant, there's now a question, Is this really OK for
me.
Dr Paul van den Bergen wrote:
snip
You're having an argument with Todd, fine, go ahead, but the message
you've responded to isn't Todd's message, it's my response to Todd's
message, as I'm sure you know. So the following bit wasn't written by
Todd, but by me - why don't you acknowledge that?
Well Paul, I certainly prefer Keith's link to an article on
his web site (plus ten links to similar sites), to your
long dissertation backed up by nothing your status quo
opinions. Are you trying to insure that next year's grant
money will be available by acting like a good little
soldier or are
keep the disargeements civilized and enlightened folks...egocentricity
has no place around here...if you choose to persist with the negativity,
don't post to the group--just argue privately and save us all the
vitriolic exchanges.
peace2u and whateverr ;-)
kn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/20/03
Kim,
Did someone die and leave the moderators job to you in
their will or are you just the newest right wing meat on
the menu? I'm sure there are more than just me around here
who have had enough of the posts sent to this list
supporeted by nothing but opinions.
I started this thread by asking
kris,
this email from you is exactly what i meant in my listing...i mean your
cutting wit is too much!after wishing you peace and suggesting that
the negativity get tuned down a little between you and paul, or that it
be done privately, i get this accusatory drivel? *...newest right wing
Umph - this has all become rather more poisonous than toothpaste...
kris,
this email from you is exactly what i meant in my listing...i mean your
cutting wit is too much!after wishing you peace and suggesting that
the negativity get tuned down a little between you and paul, or that it
be
hey keith...you're one really smart guy so why reaffirm someone who
reacts by calling me some right wing menu item when i just suggested
that the row with paul become private...notice i didn't accuse anyone of
anything--i was just honestly (perhaps too much so) stating that i
believed ego MIGHT
Hi Todd
Another proponent of acceptable risk I see.
For those not in the loop, acceptable risk (AR) is not a matter of if
anyone (or anything) gets ill, dies or is otherwise compromised, it's simply
a matter of who and when.
Which brings to question exactly why toxic pastimes that are deemed
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Toothpaste as poison
Hi Todd
Another proponent of acceptable risk I see.
For those not in the loop, acceptable risk (AR) is not a matter of if
anyone (or anything) gets ill, dies or is otherwise compromised, it's
simply
a matter of who and when.
Which
12 matches
Mail list logo
