It goes deeper than short memory and only the Bush machine. Bush is only
taking unfair advantages of a much large and loner term effort. For the
Americans the WWII has not yet stopped, so also the fight against an
illusive communism.
It is a part of the general picture of keeping the Americans
ok, obviously i touched a bare nerve of which i know nothing about, and
apologize for bringing up bad memories. sorry folks.
No, Jason, you are wrong. You did not touch a bare nerve, and they're
not bad memories. You've completely missed the point. So did Jesse.
I'm a little astonished, I don't
--- D. Mindock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this poll shows how the short term memory of
Americans is totally lacking. Also it shows
how effective the propaganda machine of BushCo is.
In a word, terrorfying.
Peace, D. Mindock P.S. We have met the enemy and he
is us.
Poll:
Hello Mike
Why're you so doubtful about it? Sure, it's always good to check, but
it's well in line with what usually happens, as people are saying.
For instance (from the list archives):
http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/20263
War on Iraq: The World According to a Bush Voter
October 21, 2004
A
Hi Mike,
What's the
deal in your country? Is your government walking in lockstep with
the will of the overwhelming majority of the "ordinary" citizens?
What is "ordinary" anyway I'll leave it at that for
now.My government would not dare to nuke anybodys Country,its already
enough for
Hakan,"...so also the fight against an illusive communism.""Illusive" is a good word to describe it, although I prefer to call it non-existant?The confrontation was betweenthe US andan expanding fascist empire in Russia. However, calling it "communist"is as deceptive as the so called "war on
"...they site a poll WITH HEADLINES that says Fox is the most trusted news source in the U.S.,..."Nice catch Mike. Despite NewsMax catering to right wing interests, I think that the polls are believable, especiallyconsidering the astounding progress made by the current regime through channels like
Mike,
Since I think I introduced corporacracy (in greek, corporation power
as opposite to democracy that is people power) on this list and think
it describes well this phenomena. A logical definition of capitalism
is today is better described as corporatism. What I mean is that it
could
My thoughts only.
If Ike E wanted to stop W.W.II why did he halt the
advance of Montgomery? Did this halt mean that the "cold war" and all it entails
kept the war machines/companies alive? I put it to you if the war had stopped in
one hit how many would have been out of work and how many
Hakan,
Which Mike are responding too? I invoked corporotacracy (but I think
corpatism is equally apt) but not Stalin.
Mike the Elder
Hakan Falk wrote:
Mike,
Since I think I introduced corporacracy (in greek, corporation power
as opposite to democracy that is people power) on this list and
Jason,
ok, obviously i touched a bare nerve
I don't think there was ever or is any bare nerve. To me, and perhaps
only to me, that implies some sort of agony, perhaps even
incapacitating. That's not quite what has happened, much less continues.
It did take a fair stretch of mental taffy to
forget everything there
Ok, now what?
Appal Energy wrote:
Yo dee ho Keith,
This offlist stuff these folks do here happens especially
if anyone mentions Aleks's Foolproof acid-base method,
they really hate Aleks, though they've never encountered
him in any way. He's at Journey to
Ryan,
Once, a bit over six years ago, I rather hastily put together a gallon
of what I thought would be biodiesel from hempseed oil. Sure enough, it
glopped out. I racked my brain as to what went wrong and could come up
with nothing, believing that I'd done everything to the tee.
Over the
Hakan,You said: "What I mean is that it could easily replace both communism and capitalism, since it is and has always been a question of which "elite" group that take the power."I respectfully disagree.Re: Replacing Communism1.) You can't replace whathasn't existed. If you mean Stalinism,
And what happened to the REST of the hemp plant?
Appal Energy wrote:
Ryan,
Once, a bit over six years ago, I rather hastily put together a gallon
of what I thought would be biodiesel from hempseed oil. Sure enough, it
glopped out. I racked my brain as to what went wrong and could come up
Thomas Kelly wrote:
I have received off list contacts by some of the funny-named
individuals you mention in your post. Their criticism of you was malicious
.. the type that says more about the critic than the one criticized.
They suggested that I go to the very places that had lead
It tastes better with cider vinegar and sea salt. Just so you know
J
Sohow about ground-up
dry wall and vinegar?
Mike
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Didn't we cover that when we were talking about album covers?On 5/8/06, Mike Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:And what happened to the REST of the hemp plant?Appal Energy wrote:
Ryan,Once, a bit over six years ago, I rather hastily put together a gallonof what I thought would be biodiesel from
Hi Todd,
Hey, what am I, smoked turkey? Jason gets off the hook but not me? Keith
said 'end of discussion' and I have respectfully sent my apology off-list.
Don't you guys go thinkin' I'm not apologetic! By golly, I do apologetic
very well!
Especially when warranted, like now, when I was all
RGH! Media Conglomerates make me sick sometimes...(gulp)
...think i'll go make a batch of fuel
Geoff
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
Biofuel at Journey
Mike,
Lenin had western support, from industrial interests, this is
documented. I even read about Lenins return to Russia, which was
arranged by western friends. Trotsky supported by competing western
interest, yes. Stalin, I do not know enough and have not seen any
records of that, he also
Hakan,
You wrote: Lenin had western support, from industrial interests, this is
documented.
Documented? Where? Perhaps it's filed under L just before the Leuchter report.
Lenin and Trotsky were influential in the creation of the first labor movement
in the US (IWW) by virtue of one of it's
Mike,
I think that you misunderstood what I said, deliberately or not, and
to start an ideological debate.
What I wanted to point out, was the similarities in that both (or all
three), was set up for a relatively small group to control the
people. The US democracy of today, is also in
Geoff
Nice one !!!
One day I will be doing the same!!! Yipe
Mark
From: Geo Mantic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Poll in favor of Nukes on Iran
Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 09:58:43 -0600
RGH! Media
i have an actual paper article here in my hand from my home town. it says a
kid from the QC moved to minnesota and has gotten the novel idea from
somewhere to raise all his cows solely and singularly on free range grasses.
he mowed down his row crops and spread seeds of clover, grass, wheat,
Here is a Philippine inventor who first started running cars on only
water almost 30 years ago. He has 100 engines he has converted that
will run on just tap or sea water. Needless to say all the car
companies have tried to steal his technology so he is going to share
it with anybody and everybody
On May 8, 2006, at 4:06 PM, D. Mindock wrote:
1 liter of water will run the car for an hour. Very efficient
electrolysis is used to get the hydrogen from the water
while the car's in operation.
No time to read the details just now -- I'm guessing the
electricity comes from a wind turbine
Hakan,
By the way, it was similar naive expectations on that the Americans
would be welcomed by the people on the streets, as in Iraq and
Afghanistan. They never learn.
No we don't. I can't tell you frustrating THAT is.
BTW, Redler and I have agreed that he will argue with you on Monday,
D. Mindock wrote:
Here is a Philippine inventor who first started running cars on only
water almost 30 years ago. He has 100 engines he has converted that
will run on just tap or sea water. Needless to say all the car
companies have tried to steal his technology so he is going to share
it
I just filled up - a good feeling indeed!
Mark` Cookson wrote:
Geoff
Nice one !!!
One day I will be doing the same!!! Yipe
Mark
From: Geo Mantic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Poll in favor of Nukes on
Paddles
Ken Provost wrote:
On May 8, 2006, at 4:06 PM, D. Mindock wrote:
1 liter of water will run the car for an hour. Very efficient
electrolysis is used to get the hydrogen from the water
while the car's in operation.
No time to read the details just now -- I'm guessing the
I don't reememmbbber
Fred Finch wrote:
Didn't we cover that when we were talking about album covers?
On 5/8/06, *Mike Weaver* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And what happened to the REST of the hemp plant?
Appal Energy wrote:
Ryan,
Once,
D. Mindock wrote:
Here is a Philippine inventor who first started running cars on only
water almost 30 years ago. He has 100 engines he has converted that
will run on just tap or sea water.
Uh huh . . .
Needless to say all the car
companies have tried to steal his technology so he
Guess I shouldn't have sent that investment check - darn, he seemed so
nice, too.
David Miller wrote:
D. Mindock wrote:
Here is a Philippine inventor who first started running cars on only
water almost 30 years ago. He has 100 engines he has converted that
will run on just tap or sea water.
Ha. I've already supercharged that car. Now it goes TWICE as fast on a
glass of water.
robert luis rabello wrote:
D. Mindock wrote:
Here is a Philippine inventor who first started running cars on only
water almost 30 years ago. He has 100 engines he has converted that
will run on just
On 5/8/06, Ken Provost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No time to read the details just now -- I'm guessing the
electricity comes from a wind turbine on top of the car,
which is turned by the wind from the car's motion down
the road! :-)
-K
Don't laugh. I actually had some discussions with
Solar panels on a Prius?
Andrew Netherton wrote:
On 5/8/06, Ken Provost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No time to read the details just now -- I'm guessing the
electricity comes from a wind turbine on top of the car,
which is turned by the wind from the car's motion down
the road! :-)
-K
You'd have to ask the folks over in China. All that came into the
warehouse was the sterile seed, which was pressed for oil.
I presume that the stalks were used for fibre/fabric, as that's where
the majority of the industrial hemp came from at the time.
Todd Swearingen
Mike Weaver wrote:
Hmmm, How nice Lets see my calculations may be of just a bit but the
liter of water takes somewhere around 300Kw hrs of electric energy to
split the water into Hydrogen and oxygen at 100% conversion, then put
this into any heat engine and reassemble getting back 100 Kw hrs of
mechanical
Sorry Jesse. I put off a response to you and then got swamped. So I
guess I'm operating the same as the petro companies at the moment
relative to their inventories - last in, first out.
I'd rather move on. But to answer your post? No anger here. At best it's
disappointment in the low calibre
40 matches
Mail list logo
