US Deploying Troops To 35 African Countries
By Russia Today
December 25, 2012
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article33431.htm
Scrambling for Africa's Resources
By Stephen Lendman
Global Research, December 26, 2012
It's more than about oil, stupid. It's for vast African riches.
Resource/mineral wars define America's agenda.
<http://www.globalresearch.ca/scrambling-for-africas-resources/5316877>
--0--
http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2012/12/27/pers-d27.html
US retools terror war in scramble for Africa
27 December 2012
The US military has announced that it is dedicating a US Army brigade
to carry out continuous operations on the African continent.
According to the Associated Press report on the decision, it is "part
of an intensifying Pentagon effort to train countries to battle
extremists and give the United States a ready and trained force to
dispatch to Africa if crises requiring the US military emerge."
Tapped to serve as Washington's version of the Afrika Corps is the
2nd Brigade, First Infantry Division, known as the "Dagger Brigade,"
which includes approximately 3,500 troops. According to the Pentagon,
it has already scheduled 104 separate missions beginning next March,
deploying units ranging from small training teams to 800-member
battalions to as many as 35 countries across Africa.
The re-assignment of this brigade is only part of an effort to beef
up the Pentagon's Africa Command, or AFRICOM, which was created in
2007 but remains headquartered in Stuttgart, Germany, with, until
now, no African government willing to provide it with a base of
operations on the continent.
Since then, AFRICOM has drawn blood in Libya, where it coordinated
the US-NATO war for regime-change that toppled the government of Col.
Muammar Gaddafi in October of last year, It has deployed over 100
troops in central Africa, supposedly to track down the guerrillas of
the Lord's Resistance Army, and provided training to a number of
countries' armies, which Washington hopes to use as proxy forces, or
cannon fodder, in pursuit of US interests.
Army Chief of Staff Gen. Raymond Odierno told the right-wing daily
Washington Times this week that the buildup of AFRICOM was part of a
new global military strategy known as "Regionally Aligned Forces,"
which the Pentagon is attempting to implement as it continues drawing
down occupation forces from Afghanistan, after being compelled to
pull out of Iraq.
"It's about us moving toward a scalable, tailorable capability that
helps them to shape the environment they're working in, doing a
variety of tasks from building partner capability to engagement, to
multilateral training to bilateral training to actual deployment of
forces, if necessary," said Odierno.
In other words, any number of US military operations, ranging from
disaster relief to so-called humanitarian assistance, as well as
training African troops, all serve as a means of "shaping the
environment," i.e., preparing the ground for direct US armed
intervention.
In 2007, J. Peter Pham, a State Department advisor who has been a
permanent member of the advisory board of AFRICOM since its creation,
testified as to the core mission of the new Pentagon command, which
he spelled out in fairly blunt terms. It involved, he said,
"protecting access to hydrocarbons and other strategic resources
which Africa has in abundance, a task which includes ensuring against
the vulnerability of those natural riches and ensuring that no other
interested third parties, such as China, India, Japan, or Russia,
obtain monopolies or preferential treatment." This last consideration
has become increasingly decisive. In a real sense, the buildup of
AFRICOM is a corollary of the Obama administration's strategic
"pivot" to the Pacific. Just as it is seeking to employ military
encirclement as a means of offsetting China's growing economic
domination of that crucial region and its rising challenge to US
capitalism's global position, so in Africa, Washington is attempting
to use US military strength to counter China's increasing influence
on the continent.
China has outstripped both the US and the European Union as Africa's
leading trade partner. Bilateral trade, which amounted to barely $11
billion in 2000, topped $160 billion in 2011 and is expected to reach
$200 billion this year.
Under conditions where the US is expected soon to count on West
Africa for 25 percent of its petroleum imports, not to mention a
variety of strategic minerals and other raw materials, the
competition with China as well as economic rivals in Europe amounts
to a new scramble for Africa, every bit as violent and exploitative
as the original colonial conquest.
The preparations for predatory acts of militarism in Africa, however,
are being made under the pretext of combating "terrorism" and the
threat of "extremism" on the continent.
AFRICOM's commander, Gen. Carter Ham, has made a series of speeches
in both the US and Africa on this theme, claiming that widely
disparate groups ranging from the Islamist Al Qaeda in the Islamic
Maghreb in Mali and Libya to al-Shabab in Somalia and the Boko Haram
group in Nigeria are threatening to link up and coordinate their
activities, posing a serious threat to the US "homeland." Neither he
nor anyone else has presented any evidence of such collaboration
between movements that have shown no ambitions outside of their own
national spheres.
The Wall Street Journal earlier this month put forward the same
thesis in a front-page article entitled "Terror Fight shifts to
Africa." According to the Journal, the Obama administration "is
considering asking Congress to approve expanded authority" to carry
out military actions against alleged terrorists in Africa. Such an
authorization of the use of military force was the basis for the more
than decade-long wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
This new authorization "would be aimed at allowing US military
operations in Mali, Nigeria, Libya and possibly other countries where
militants have loose or nonexistent ties to al Qaeda's Pakistan
headquarters," administration officials told the Journal .
In reality, while exploiting Al Qaeda-and organizations with "loose
or nonexistent ties" to it-as a pretext for US militarist
intervention, Washington has armed and directly supported Al
Qaeda-linked elements, first in Libya and now in Syria, as proxy
forces in its wars for regime-change.
Following last week's UN Security Council vote authorizing
intervention, Mali appears to be the most immediate target for US
action, with AFRICOM openly preparing to support an intervention that
is to be conducted with troops drawn from the Economic Community of
West African States.
While Washington poses as Mali's savior, the situation in that
impoverished, landlocked West African country is overwhelmingly a
creation of US imperialism itself. It was its intervention in Libya
which sent heavily armed forces spilling over the border, and it was
the US military that trained Capt. Amadou Haya Sanogo, the leader of
the coup that overthrew the country's government last March. The
Pentagon put him through courses at US military bases in Georgia,
Virginia and Texas.
The buildup of AFRICOM and the preparation of new wars on the
continent make clear that the interventions in Libya and Syria are
only the beginning of what amounts to a global offensive aimed at
re-dividing and re-colonizing much of the world. This eruption of
American militarism, the byproduct of the historic crisis of US and
world capitalism, goes hand in hand with ever more savage attacks on
the social conditions and democratic rights of the working class at
home.
Bill Van Auken
_______________________________________________
Sustainablelorgbiofuel mailing list
Sustainablelorgbiofuel@lists.sustainablelists.org
http://lists.eruditium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel