On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 at 16:08, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Apr 2021, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
> > If anything there's less chance of this as all tests see the domain
> exactly as it was when first created.
>
> So what happens if on east I make a change in /source and "make install" ?
>
On Tue, 20 Apr 2021, Andrew Cagney wrote:
If anything there's less chance of this as all tests see the domain exactly as
it was when first created.
So what happens if on east I make a change in /source and "make install" ?
I do that a _lot_ when coding, and I surely do not want to have to
I've just pushed several changes to how KVM guest domains are created; and
at least the first requires a domain rebuild:
- Fedora domains have switched to /etc/fstab from systemd.mountd, and 9p
file systems are automounted
- OpenBSD clone from the correct base domain
Andrew
I'm a bit nervous about snapshots. We originally went with reboot uml/kvm
> between each test to ensure a clean slate. If we start re-using snapshots,
> I fear there will be secret sauces in these snapshots. While a base
> snapshot for the entire test run seems a good idea, having them per-test
>
On Mon, 19 Apr 2021, Andrew Cagney wrote:
Moving the nsd/unbound stuff out of transmogrify makes sense.
It would be nice if we could also start them manually and specifying the
config file, so we don't need as many bind mounts and things.
> - with namespaces, the nsd and unbound
On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 at 10:03, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:
> This describes three functions that no longer exist:
> goodmask, masktobits, and bitstomask.
>
> - we should delete it and the things that reference it
> lib/libswan/ipsec_bitstomask.3
> lib/libswan/ipsec_masktobits.3
>
>
This describes three functions that no longer exist:
goodmask, masktobits, and bitstomask.
- we should delete it and the things that reference it
lib/libswan/ipsec_bitstomask.3
lib/libswan/ipsec_masktobits.3
- we should document any replacement function
I think Andrew made the
