On Mon, 10 Apr 2023 at 10:58, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2023, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure what to do about floating domains, although road seems
> > strangely hardwired :-)
>
> It is from a dhcp point of view, but from a configuration point of view,
> road is never
On Mon, 10 Apr 2023, Andrew Cagney wrote:
I'm not sure what to do about floating domains, although road seems
strangely hardwired :-)
It is from a dhcp point of view, but from a configuration point of view,
road is never supposed to have hardcoded IPs, only "%defaultroute".
On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 at 10:56, Antony Antony wrote:
>
> For last couple of years I have been using an extended version of the
> FreSWAN diagram and added "duo" and "float"
>
> My motivation was more clear hosts, routing FLOAT with dual uplink.
>
>
For last couple of years I have been using an extended version of the
FreSWAN diagram and added "duo" and "float"
My motivation was more clear hosts, routing FLOAT with dual uplink.
https://libreswan.org/wiki/images/f/f1/Testnet-202102.png
I have nsrun that support sunset,sunrise, Tokyo. I
On Mon, 25 Jul 2022, Andrew Cagney wrote:
I'd like to add a domain to the test framework. The motivation is to
allow end-to-end testing of scenarios where non IPsec domains route
their traffic through IPsec gateways. For instance:
{ROAD,TRAIN} - NORTH = NIC - {EAST,WEST}
NIC really
I'd like to add a domain to the test framework. The motivation is to
allow end-to-end testing of scenarios where non IPsec domains route
their traffic through IPsec gateways. For instance:
{ROAD,TRAIN} - NORTH = NIC - {EAST,WEST}
where NORTH and NIC would be running libreswan, while ROAD,
