Done. Issue #1498.
On 12/26/2023 10:07 AM, Andrew Cagney wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 at 09:32, Bill Atwood wrote:
Paul, Brady,
On 12/18/2023 9:42 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
* 4a936b2aad - The XFRM address scope must be global (12 hours ago)
While this constraint must be true for the
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 at 09:32, Bill Atwood wrote:
>
> Paul, Brady,
>
> On 12/18/2023 9:42 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> > * 4a936b2aad - The XFRM address scope must be global (12 hours ago)
> >
>
> While this constraint must be true for the current XFRM (it does not
> understand that Link-Local
Paul, Brady,
On 12/18/2023 9:42 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
* 4a936b2aad - The XFRM address scope must be global (12 hours ago)
While this constraint must be true for the current XFRM (it does not
understand that Link-Local addresses must have an interface associated
with them), the
On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 at 21:42, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> On Mon, 18 Dec 2023, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
> >> Is there a reason why git head shouldn’t all go in?
> >
> > git head is at v5.0rc1
>
> No?
Tuomo and I cleared the backlog yesterday morning. Which was after I
sent that e-mail.
Andrew
>
On Mon, 18 Dec 2023, Andrew Cagney wrote:
Is there a reason why git head shouldn’t all go in?
git head is at v5.0rc1
No?
git log --graph --pretty=format:'%Cred%h%Creset -%C(yellow)%d%Creset %s %Cgreen(%cr)
%C(bold blue)<%an>%Creset' --abbrev-commit --date=relative
* 1b08bddaca - (HEAD
On Sun, 17 Dec 2023 at 14:37, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> Is there a reason why git head shouldn’t all go in?
git head is at v5.0rc1
> Paul
>
> Sent using a virtual keyboard on a phone
>
> > On Dec 17, 2023, at 11:03, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >
> > First the easy ones, I think these patches should
Is there a reason why git head shouldn’t all go in?
Paul
Sent using a virtual keyboard on a phone
> On Dec 17, 2023, at 11:03, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
> First the easy ones, I think these patches should go in:
>
> #1482 building openbsd: don't try to use SADB_X_SPDFLUSH
> #1483 building:
First the easy ones, I think these patches should go in:
#1482 building openbsd: don't try to use SADB_X_SPDFLUSH
#1483 building: fix typo in ok[] initializer
#1464 The XFRM address scope must be global
The next group fix packaging. They are low-risk in that they don't
touch the code base so I
