Re: [Swan-dev] heads up tests switching to f35 from f32; build->fedora-build

2021-12-14 Thread Andrew Cagney
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 at 12:51, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote: > > | From: Andrew Cagney > > Great! > > Trying it out now. > > | You'll want to rebuild the domains from scratch and wipe your > | $(KVM_POOLDIR), probably: > | ./kvm demolish > > Is that different from "make kvm-demolish"? I did both.

Re: [Swan-dev] heads up tests switching to f35 from f32; build->fedora-build

2021-12-14 Thread D. Hugh Redelmeier
| From: Andrew Cagney Great! Trying it out now. | You'll want to rebuild the domains from scratch and wipe your | $(KVM_POOLDIR), probably: | ./kvm demolish Is that different from "make kvm-demolish"? I did both. | rm ../pooldir/* Should there be a make target to do this? | I'd also

Re: [Swan-dev] heads up tests switching to f35 from f32; build->fedora-build

2021-12-10 Thread Andrew Cagney
Hopefully most of the churn is over. You'll want to rebuild the domains from scratch and wipe your $(KVM_POOLDIR), probably: ./kvm demolish rm ../pooldir/* I'd also use something like virt-manager to track down any delinquent domains (after a demolish there should not be any) Here's what

[Swan-dev] heads up tests switching to f35 from f32; build->fedora-build

2021-11-30 Thread Andrew Cagney
It's down to 6 fails (slightly more if I include some tests that have things to fix such as seccomm). as well as switching east, west, to f35, there's been some re-org of how domains are built: - Fedora, NetBSD, and OpenBSD use the same make rules when being built the consequence is that