On Sat, 8 May 2021 at 15:33, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:
> | From: Andrew Cagney
>
> | The old behavior was that a NULL implied that the nested struct, if any,
> | could be ignored. I'd call that obvious behaviour.
> | (passing a pbs when not needed was benign).
>
> That's not what the contract
| From: Andrew Cagney
| The old behavior was that a NULL implied that the nested struct, if any,
| could be ignored. I'd call that obvious behaviour.
| (passing a pbs when not needed was benign).
That's not what the contract said. Ever.
| Now, if this is done wrong, and on a rarely executed
On Sat, 8 May 2021 at 12:27, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:
> | commit 9945236619b17fa13dfd1cfbe60359dcbf3fcd21
> | Author: D. Hugh Redelmeier
> | Date: Fri May 7 23:58:52 2021 -0400
> |
> | pluto: packet.c: add consistency check to pbs_in_struct
> |
> | pbs_in_struct now requires that if
| commit 9945236619b17fa13dfd1cfbe60359dcbf3fcd21
| Author: D. Hugh Redelmeier
| Date: Fri May 7 23:58:52 2021 -0400
|
| pluto: packet.c: add consistency check to pbs_in_struct
|
| pbs_in_struct now requires that if and only if the structure has a
| length field then the
