Thanks !Keep us informed !On 4/14/06, Steve Webster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Quentin, I submitted this message, but, as it had some attachments, it didn't go through... Here (http://dasp.free.fr/more/swfmill-attachments.zip
) is what I attached and here is what I wrote :I'll look
Thanks a lot homies !I've tried it with some of my complex SWFs and it runs fine !You saved me a lot of time converting these naughty event actions...Again, Thanks ! You're doin' a great work !Cheers !
On 4/16/06, daniel fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hey all,here's a prerelease with more work
Hi there, I'm looking for a command line tool that would simply get the frame rate of a SWF, or its version...Something that would go like this :
cmd-tool -v myFile.swf7 cmd-tool -r myFile.swf24Anyone know if this tool exists ?Or maybe swfmill could support this ?See y'all !
:
Quentin, Hi there ! I don't know if this has been noticed before (I couldn't find it in
the archives) but I've found something weird... I tried to place a SWF on a frame, and this SWF only had a static text textfield on the _root. Unfortunately, when generating a new SWF
and opening
Thanks for the link !Sorry to bother, but how can you explain the SWF generated by the Flash IDE works fine, but the one rendered via swfmill has this floating point problem ?Cheers !
On 4/20/06, Mark Winterhalder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/20/06, Quentin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi ! I have
havoc ?On 4/21/06,
Mark Winterhalder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/21/06, Quentin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the link ! Sorry to bother, but how can you explain the SWF generated by the Flash IDE works fine, but the one rendered via swfmill has this floating point problem
?The one generated
Bug posted...On 4/21/06, Steve Webster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Quentin, I know this has been posted before (see http://osflash.org/pipermail/swfmill_osflash.org/2006-January/000361.html
) but no answer was made... The thing is, I get a lot of these errors : WARNING: unknown fill style type
If you can submit a pre-release, I would appreciate it very much !And I'll let you know if it fixes the bug in my hundreds of flash animations...On 5/11/06,
daniel fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hey Quentin,
i found the little bugger responsible for that mistake, and put a lot of bugspray
Great news !Can't wait 'till the next release !On 5/11/06, daniel fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quentin,i'm happy to report that another of your bugs should be fixed on svn (#12 as of [134]). I could reproduce the error with your caisse.swf, found a missing feature (DefineShape2/3 support
Hi!I have a SWF containing a shape and some text and when placing it with SwfMill, both the shape and the text disappear...Don't know more...I posted a bug at :
http://mirror1.cvsdude.com/trac/osflash/swfmill/ticket/17nb : the SWF attached to the bug track only contains what is not rendered.
Good idea!I vote for the second option...Cheers !On 5/26/06, Steve Webster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: Could it be possible as an addition to swfmill simple language to add a
new attribute to font element ? I propose glyph-range, but it could be utf-range or something. The purpose could be to embed
Even better !On 5/26/06, Steve Webster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/26/06, Quentin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good idea! I vote for the second option...I was thinking that both would be implemented so you could pick and choose.
Steve--Steve Websterhttp
:06 PM, Quentin wrote:
[ ... ]Could you tell us what SwfMill helps you doing within this game ?Funny one, tho ![ ... ]
Allright, to know what i'm talking about you should maybe play onceat
http://www.benettonplay.com/toys/oddoneout/pair/KashmirYou see a grid of 2x2, 4x4, 8x8, 9x9, 12x12 and 16x16
Good question, if anyone has any idea in this, I'll be interested too !Cheers !On 7/6/06, Martin Wood
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Is there an (easy) way to declare an array using the simple dialect?
OR, maybe what i need to ask is this :Do tags that arent specifically part of the simple dialect get
Let me try this out !On 7/21/06, daniel fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hey list,in a quick follow-up, i present a fix to a new bug introduced with 0.2.11.9: steve's fixes for fixed-point read/write, while working nicely for the flash8 filter tags, broke the reading/writing of fixed-point values
It is already attached : http://swfmill.org/trac/attachment/ticket/5/buggy-stamp.swf !On 7/24/06,
daniel fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Quentin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (on Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:12:19 +0200): I've got a good and a bad news : Yes, it fixes #9, but no it doesn't fix #5...Hey Quentin
Hi!And I've noticed it's the same with various fonts...Hope someone will find the bug, and smash it!Thanks, bye...On 9/5/06, Quentin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hi !I experienced a bug yesterday when placing a Flash generated SWF that had a TextField on the stage. This TextField was not being
or buggy!
Maybe the (very long) time it takes comes from the swfmill simple option
itself.
Hope someone out there will have a clue... Thanks in advance!
Quentin
dasp.free.fr
ps : If you need my swfmill simple stamper XML file, please let me know, I
could also share (via email) the SWFs that slow
Hi there folks! And happy new year...
I'm using SwfMill a lot (especially server-side) and I appreciate how
powerful it is and how easily we can act on SWFs...
But I have questions regarding encryption : wouldn't it be nice if we could
output encrypted SWFs?
Is it hard for those who develop
Thanks very much, I'll check these products out !
-Quentin.
On 1/10/07, Jon Molesa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check out swftools. I seem to remember there being some obfuscating
ability in that toolset. However, I don't think i was as simple as
swftool -encrypt my.swf. I also seem to remember
Same issue here, I know I have an account but I can't log in...
My login might be my email address but the password I think I was using for
this Trac site doesn't seem to work!
Someone's got clues ?
On 9/30/06, Eric Priou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Dan,
Is there any mean to recover my user
0xE4
WARNING: unknown fill style type 0xE0
WARNING: end of tag DefineShape5 is @173, should be @160
Thanks!
Quentin.
dasp.free.fr
On 6/14/07, Ralf Fuest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Roxlu,
I wrote a patch that should fix your gradient problem. I still noticed a
bug while using it, but I
Oops!
Here's the SWF I should have sent...
On 6/19/07, Quentin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there!
I'm also having issues with some gradients (these gradients could be
called 'advanced gradients' and are the consequence of moving the 'focal
point' you'll see here :
http://livedocs.adobe.com
Great, thanks!
I didn't notice there had been updates to SwfMill!
Have a nice day...
Quentin.
dasp.free.fr
On 6/19/07, Ralf Fuest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Quentin,
thanks for your test file. But I think you are using an older version of
swfmill that doesn't support radial gradients
working option is the following :
FileAttributes hasMetaData=0 useNetwork=1 /
placed right after the movie tag...
I hope this helps!
Quentin.
dasp.free.fr
___
swfmill mailing list
swfmill@osflash.org
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo
Hello,
First of all, sorry to re-post this, but I'm working on a project that
really needs to have this bug (?) fixed in swfmill!
If someone out there has the ability to do it, it'd be a nice
Christmas present...
Once again, sorry for upping this thread... But holidays'll be here soon!
Quentin
] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/swfmill-0.2.12.4/src'
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
I did this with swfmill 0.2.12.4
I'm far from being a Linux expert, but I hope this helps!
I'd be glad to help out on the wiki side of things, for sure!
Quentin.
On Dec 18, 2007 8:01 PM, Daniel
Well, I think I'm not skilled enough for that...
I've never used SVN and I'm afraid of doing something wrong!
I think I know how to install xsltproc but I might not be able to go
further...
Too bad!
Quentin.
On Dec 19, 2007 5:01 PM, Daniel Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007
]: Leaving directory `/var/swfmill-svn/src'
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
Sorry about that!
Quentin.
On Dec 19, 2007 5:54 PM, Mark Winterhalder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 19, 2007 5:40 PM, Quentin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I think I'm not skilled enough for that...
I've never
_xsltNumberData::xmlChar'
And so on...
If you guys have any clue, It'd be nice!
Quentin.
On Dec 19, 2007 7:54 PM, Daniel Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:16:32 +0100
Quentin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry about that!
no need to be sorry.. you do have xsltproc
audience...
Well, that's just my 2 cents...
Quentin. - BRAND NEW http://toki-woki.net/blog/
___
swfmill mailing list
swfmill@osflash.org
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
I there!
Well, we finally got it working!
But I was wondering if the patch had been applied to the SVN?
Quentin.
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 8:51 PM, Quentin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I installed it and nothing changed...
Still looking for help!
Quentin.
On Dec 20, 2007 7:53 PM, Ralf
Great, thanks!
Quentin.
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Ralf Fuest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've applied the patch to the svn in the end of december.
Ralf
Am Donnerstag, den 14.02.2008, 18:19 +0100 schrieb Quentin:
I there!
Well, we finally got it working!
But I was wondering
blue=0/
/color
/SetBackgroundColor
UnknownTag id=0x18/
DefineShape3 objectID=2
We're quite close to perfection...
I hope someone can fix this!
Quentin.
http://toki-woki.net
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Quentin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great, thanks!
Quentin
with it.
I hope someone handles this!
Quentin.
http://toki-woki.net
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Quentin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I there!
Sorry for coming back to you once again but it seems like even with the
patch applied (I'm running swfmill 0.2.12.6) I still get duplicate
Damn, it seems like I'm the only one waiting for this.
Noaki, did you find a clue?
Quentin.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Quentin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You might be interested in reading this previous mail:
http://osflash.org/pipermail/swfmill_osflash.org/2007-December/001615.html
Yes, for complex SWFs it didn't act the same...
I also have the SVN version!
I'll send some files that won't work for you to test.
Thanks!
Quentin.
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Naoki INADA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried following.
1. child.xml
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8 ?
movie
I mean: various Flash versions (6,7,8) and/or heavy (in bytes) SWFs and/or
many items in the library...
I'll send examples tomorrow when I get back to work!
Quentin.
http://toki-woki.net
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Eric Priou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Yes, for complex SWFs it didn't
...
I think I'm running the latest svn version (0.2.12.6).
I hope someone tackles this down!
Quentin.
http://toki-woki.net
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 8:14 PM, Quentin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I mean: various Flash versions (6,7,8) and/or heavy (in bytes) SWFs and/or
many items in the library...
I'll
Well nope. No other issue!
Thanks again.
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Quentin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow!
Can't believe it was that simple, damn it!
A big thank you, and a hat tip to this great community!
I have an other issue, which I will share on a other thread, not to mix
things
Hi there!
In fact there was a bug, that can easily be fixed by specifying both
FileAttributes (the tag, with useNetwork attribute) and local-access
(the attribute on the movie tag)...
Hope this helps.
Quentin.
http://toki-woki.net
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Eric Priou [EMAIL PROTECTED
In fact the possible options for useNetwork are 0 or 1.
I updated the docs.
Quentin.
http://toki-woki.net
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Eric Priou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've updated the osflash doc :
http://osflash.org/swfmill#flash_8_new_features
Please check the correctness.
Cheers
some money on this.
Thanks in advance!
Quentin.
http://toki-woki.net
___
swfmill mailing list
swfmill@osflash.org
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
Upping this thread.
Did anyone get this issue too?
Is there any sub-release on its way?
I'd really need this to be fixed as it breaks some of my workflow...
Please help!
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:11, Quentin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list!
I came up with a bug while placing a quite complex
44 matches
Mail list logo
