[swinog] good and bad blacklists?

2006-02-28 Diskussionsfäden Marco Balmer
Hello, Has everyone experiences with good and bad blacklists for mail-servers? For the moment I use the following three: relays.ordb.org sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org bl.spamcop.net Thx Marco ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch

Re: [swinog] good and bad blacklists?

2006-02-28 Diskussionsfäden Marc Michel
Thank you for your email. I will be out of office until 6th March 2006. In urgent cases, please contact our support department on 0848 000 627 or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Best regards, Marc Michel ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch

RE: [swinog] good and bad blacklists?

2006-02-28 Diskussionsfäden Glogger Steven
well, spamcop is something you might have to reconsider... too much crap ;-) use it only for additional spamassassin scoring... -steven -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marco Balmer Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 11:29 AM To:

Re: [swinog] good and bad blacklists?

2006-02-28 Diskussionsfäden Marc Michel
Thank you for your email. I will be out of office until 6th March 2006. In urgent cases, please contact our support department on 0848 000 627 or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Best regards, Marc Michel ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch

Re: [swinog] good and bad blacklists?

2006-02-28 Diskussionsfäden Benoit Panizzon
Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2006 11.28 schrieb Marco Balmer: Hello, Has everyone experiences with good and bad blacklists for mail-servers? For the moment I use the following three: relays.ordb.org sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org bl.spamcop.net I wouldn't use Blacklist for direct blocking anymore. Just

Re: [swinog] good and bad blacklists?

2006-02-28 Diskussionsfäden Marc Michel
Thank you for your email. I will be out of office until 6th March 2006. In urgent cases, please contact our support department on 0848 000 627 or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Best regards, Marc Michel ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch

Re: [swinog] good and bad blacklists?

2006-02-28 Diskussionsfäden Fredy Kuenzler
Marc Michel schrieb: Thank you for your email. I will be out of office until 6th March 2006. Stupid autoresponder not obeying precedence list has been removed (Netstream: what dumb software are you using? Please get something better) F. ___

Re: [swinog] good and bad blacklists?

2006-02-28 Diskussionsfäden Martin Ebnoether
Glogger Steven schrieb: well, spamcop is something you might have to reconsider... too much crap ;-) use it only for additional spamassassin scoring... SMTP based witch hunting service. CU, Venty ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch

Re: [swinog] good and bad blacklists?

2006-02-28 Diskussionsfäden Alexis Caceda
Hi Fredy! Well.. It's NOT Xchange and NOT Pine ;) Cheers! Al swinog@swinog.ch on Dienstag, 28. Februar 2006 at 11:41 +0100 wrote: Marc Michel schrieb: Thank you for your email. I will be out of office until 6th March 2006. Stupid autoresponder not obeying precedence list has been removed

Re: [swinog] good and bad blacklists?

2006-02-28 Diskussionsfäden Benoit Panizzon
Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2006 11.45 schrieb Alexis Caceda: Hi Fredy! Well.. It's NOT Xchange and NOT Pine ;) FC is exaclty as BAD :-) -Benoit- -- SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM / Hormel's new miracle meat in a can Tastes fine, saves time. / If you want something grand, / Ask for SPAM! - Hormel's 1937

Re: [swinog] good and bad blacklists?

2006-02-28 Diskussionsfäden Daniel Kamm
Hi Marco On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 11:28 +0100, Marco Balmer wrote: Has everyone experiences with good and bad blacklists for mail-servers? For the moment I use the following three: relays.ordb.org sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org bl.spamcop.net What about dnsrbl.swinog.ch? :-D or: dnsbl.sorbs.net is