Hi Folks!
We're facing a growing amount of automatically generated HTTP POST requests,
all containing spamvertising links like
http://19.altribeati.com/homoerectus/
As far as i know, there are the following ways to handle that:
a) Spamfilter of recipient shall filter that
b) Web-user has
Salut,
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 05:35:26PM +0200, Matthias Hertzog wrote:
b) Web-user has to enter a unique number (generated image) in the form to
prove, he's a human being.
The problem here is that spam bots are apparrently exceptionally good
already at reading these characters out of the
Jeroen Massar wrote:
Matthias Hertzog wrote:
Hi Folks!
We're facing a growing amount of automatically generated HTTP POST
requests, all containing spamvertising links like
http://19.altribeati.com/homoerectus/
As far as i know, there are the following ways to handle that:
Does anyone out
Salut,
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 06:19:21PM +0200, Matthias Keller wrote:
One thing I have been pretty successful in blocking spam is javascript...
Of course one can argue not all browser support or execute JS but today
when every 3rd site completely relies on JS this is no valid point
On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 17:35 +0200, Matthias Hertzog wrote:
We're facing a growing amount of automatically generated HTTP POST requests,
all containing spamvertising links
We are also struggling with this issue, but not only since a few days or
weeks. I get 3-6 abused forms each day!
IMO it's
Tonnerre LOMBARD wrote:
Salut,
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 06:19:21PM +0200, Matthias Keller wrote:
One thing I have been pretty successful in blocking spam is javascript...
Of course one can argue not all browser support or execute JS but today
when every 3rd site completely relies on JS
@MK: Your method implies, that the user has a javascript enabled
browser, else the post would fail. This means in the end you loose
customers, because they're surfing with lynx.
Peter
On 8/15/06, Matthias Keller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tonnerre LOMBARD wrote:
Salut,
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006
7 matches
Mail list logo