Re: [swinog] IPV6 Go (lazy providers)

2009-02-28 Diskussionsfäden Tonnerre Lombard
Salut, Stanislav, On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:43:29 -0800 (PST), Stanislav Sinyagin wrote: so, what? I'm not telling that ipv6 is impossible, I'm just telling that there's no standard as such. And none of the big telcos would afford building a custom solution: everyone waits for standards to be

Re: [swinog] IPV6 Go (lazy providers)

2009-02-28 Diskussionsfäden Tonnerre Lombard
Hey, Fredy, On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:25:38 +0100, Fredy Kuenzler wrote: If you don't get extra v4 space in 1000 days, don't even consider to complain. You have been warned. Since RIPE is planning to reclaim unassigned allocations, I expect a potential heart infarct of old IPv4 routers (Cogent?

Re: [swinog] IPV6 Go (lazy providers)

2009-02-28 Diskussionsfäden Martin Ebnoether
On the Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 12:39:46PM +0100, Tonnerre Lombard blubbered: Apple is gaining a lot of market share, and their products configure IPv6 all by themselves. Same goes for Windows Vista. Ok, for XP you have to install IPv6 support first, I think. True, true. Though, there still are

Re: [swinog] IPV6 Go (lazy providers)

2009-02-28 Diskussionsfäden Andreas Fink
On 28.02.2009, at 21:52, Martin Ebnoether wrote: On the Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 12:39:46PM +0100, Tonnerre Lombard blubbered: Apple is gaining a lot of market share, and their products configure IPv6 all by themselves. Same goes for Windows Vista. Ok, for XP you have to install IPv6 support