n Massar wrote:
On 2016-09-20 15:58, Jim Romaguera wrote:
On 20.09.2016 15:40, Jeroen Massar wrote:
Anybody has a proper excuse? :)
No I don't have an excuse but interested in the communities (& your)
opinion re your challenge...
o DHCPv6 re Android re enterprise, BYOD, PWLAN, etc environme
On 20.09.2016 15:40, Jeroen Massar wrote:
Anybody has a proper excuse? :)
No I don't have an excuse but interested in the communities (& your)
opinion re your challenge...
o DHCPv6 re Android re enterprise, BYOD, PWLAN, etc environments
Is a problem or was a problem / no problem at all?
indeed... well stated Andre. This SWITCH / legal process needs still
*alot* of fine-tuning.
Cheers JIm
On 12.08.2012 19:12, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 10.08.2012 16:27, Serge Droz wrote:
Hello Swinogers,
you may have read our press release yesterday:
Hi Serge,
Gotta agree with Olivier, Andre Mike. This is a strange decision and a
strange process (2 weeks to react to this new world order???). Makes me
wonder why such a strange strategy couldn't be extrapolated to where .ch
is disconnected unless some subdomain spreading malware stops
Hi Pascal,
I'm not saying I'm against your below list - haven't thought about it
enough yet - but an ISP association seems to imply ISPs - Internet
Service Providers. Your list might be tending to an Internet
association (it depends on what so on means I guess). It would be
good to have an
Hi Pascal Jens,
If you expand my definition to include an obligation to register (or be
registered whether you like it or not) by BAKOM, BUPF or any other
government mnemonic *because* of your offering of public Internet
services (which is a general term for access, service providers, etc)
Referencing WoZ...funny that UMTS GSM Online surfing is excluded -
reasons almost certainly being the untold gazillions (financial impact)
needed to technically achieve that goal - whilst the financial impact
for small/middle ISPs seems to carry no weight (according to Mr Piatti
of EJPD)
7 matches
Mail list logo
