1980s, we used
_large_ electromagnets.
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (2.7°C)
___
swinog mailing list -- swinog@lists.swinog.ch
To unsubscribe send an email to swinog-le...@lists.swinog.ch
Does anyone have any idea what sort of rate limits are used by
Office365 ? We seem to be hitting $SUBJ more and more often, so we
have been scaling back delivery frequencies. It just seems a bit
random and arbitrary.
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (19.4°C
Per Jessen wrote:
> A customer with a flooded telephone cable is trying to re-establish
> the internet connection over a GSM modem - the mobile operator is
> Swisscom.
> He is not getting any inbound traffic, e.g. SMTP on port 25. I was
> just wondering if this might be blo
A customer with a flooded telephone cable is trying to re-establish the
internet connection over a GSM modem - the mobile operator is Swisscom.
He is not getting any inbound traffic, e.g. SMTP on port 25. I was
just wondering if this might be blocked?
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (19.3°C)
http
Tobi wrote:
> Am 30.05.2018 um 17:35 schrieb Per Jessen:
>> Okay, thanks for clarifying that - I was wondering. I don't why my
>> postfixes come up with host name 'unknown'.
>
> afaik postfix logs "unknown" as well if it is not a FcrRDNS means the
> hostname
Jeroen Massar wrote:
> On 2018-05-30 16:44, Per Jessen wrote:
>> According to RFC1034 and 2181, a PTR record using a CNAME is not
>> permitted. I believe this to still be correct, postfix certainly
>> doesn't work with a CNAME when it does a reverse lookup.
>
According to RFC1034 and 2181, a PTR record using a CNAME is not
permitted. I believe this to still be correct, postfix certainly
doesn't work with a CNAME when it does a reverse lookup.
Any comments?
thanks.
Per
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (28.6°C)
http://www.dns24.ch/ - free dynamic DNS
ecord another host resource is
> already pointing to. A Host resource could also point to multiple A
> records (DNS round robin).
>
> A in-addr.arpa resource can only point to one PTR record.
In _can_ in fact have multiple, but it makes no sense and usually only
the first one is used.
Viktor Steinmann wrote:
> On 04.01.2017 08:54, Per Jessen wrote:
>>
>> Is there any point in greylisting genuine mailservers? We only
>> greylist dodgy-looking setups.
>>
>>
>> /Per
>>
> I don't see how this approach would scale.
To my kno
ny point in greylisting genuine mailservers? We only greylist
dodgy-looking setups.
/Per
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (1.2°C)
http://www.dns24.ch/ - your free DNS host, made in Switzerland.
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
of internal M$ "reputation list".
Thanks for everyone's suggestions!
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (4.0°C)
http://www.hostsuisse.com/ - dedicated server rental in Switzerland.
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Per Jessen wrote:
> Hoi zäme
>
> I have a couple of customers complaining they are unable to send
> emails to hotmail - typically they see rejects such as this:
>
>> 550 SC-001 (BAY004-MC5F11) Unfortunately, messages from
>> 88.198.198.124 weren't sent. Please co
scom, UPC and e.g. Virgin
(in the UK). Has anyone seen something similar?
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (-0.1°C)
http://www.dns24.ch/ - your free DNS host, made in Switzerland.
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bi
t Hetzner,
same error message. Other messages go through fine. (28 today sofar).
/Per
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (0.2°C)
http://www.dns24.ch/ - free dynamic DNS, made in Switzerland.
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
getting an explanation from UPC, but sofar no luck.
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (2.8°C)
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Silvia Hagen wrote:
Silvia Hagen
Chair Swiss IPv6 Council
Hi Silvia,
FYI, the website http://www.swissipv6council.ch/ seems to only show a
welcome page (from iway). On many other pages I get a 404. For
instance http://www.swissipv6council.ch/en/membership/register
Gruss
Per Jessen
from blacklisted IP address [74.55.86.74]
The IP address belongs to Webfaction.com, they would like to investigate
the matter.
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (10.4°C)
http://www.dns24.ch/ - free dynamic DNS, made in Switzerland.
___
swinog mailing list
swinog
in Asterisk) ? For the last 2-3
years, I have been getting the occasional message read out to me by
Swisscom.
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (9.8°C)
http://www.dns24.ch/ - free dynamic DNS, made in Switzerland.
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http
also
don't see any way of distinguishing between a voice call and an SMS,
but I'll have to look closer.
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (9.4°C)
http://www.dns24.ch/ - your free DNS host, made in Switzerland.
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http
Per Jessen wrote:
Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
well, last time I tried, it was only possible to send an SMS from a
Swisscom mobile to a Swisscom fixline.
We send SMS'es every day the other way, i.e. from fixline to mobile.
This is via ISDN though.
SIP providers were out of scope, and non
it.
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (8.7°C)
http://www.dns24.ch/ - your free DNS host, made in Switzerland.
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
in smsq Befehle umgewandelt,
und als Dateien in /var/spool/asterisk/motx/ geschrieben und
automatisch von Asterisk gesendet.
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (11.4°C)
http://www.dns24.ch/ - your free DNS service, made in Switzerland.
___
swinog mailing list
swinog
range on
meifi.net. Dunno why it is taking them so long.
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (1.3°C)
http://www.dns24.ch/ - free DNS hosting, made in Switzerland.
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
more sense. Perhaps the list would have been
better named jobads :-)
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (21.8°C)
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
a enrichment to have that list.
Lists may be cheap, but that is irrelevant. I second Viktors view -
splitting the group too much only splits/destroys the group. Besides,
a software developer who does not know how to filter SwiNOG mail into a
separate folder, well ... :-)
--
Per Jessen, Zürich
.
Very nice - doesn't look like they do a VDSL version too?
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (0.0°C)
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Andreas Fink wrote:
one year is already in law for telecommunication (voice calls, SMS
etc). My daily headake to keep logs of 3 billion messages
lzma compression plus 3Tb harddrives :-)
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (6.3°C)
___
swinog mailing list
phone number do you use?
I'm using landline SMS'ing now, but otherwise I think it was
079 499 9000 at 30Rp/SMS.
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (0.9°C)
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Per Jessen wrote:
but otherwise I think it was
079 499 9000 at 30Rp/SMS.
Sorry, the number Mike Kellenberger posted is the correct one.
sms_client also uses ucp.
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (1.2°C)
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
to the
originating number, we made the mobile phones make different beeps
depending on the type of alert.
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (1.1°C)
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
obligation applies if you are providing internet
_access_ services. public Internet services is a much wider
definition.
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (6.7°C)
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
if the failure was caused by a lookup problem.
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (11.0°C)
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
any requirement by a RFC? If so, which one?
I feel pretty certain it is not according to any RFC.
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (15.0°C)
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
no commercial interest
(never laughed so hard).
In their defense, they have lowered the registration fees at least three
times in the last 8-9 years. That does show some lack of commercial
interest.
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (24.6°C)
___
swinog
that different.
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (24.8°C)
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
062210, which works very well.
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (20.8°C)
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
they can
charge the SMS on your invoice.
True.
I belive glue.ch still offers TSP independent SMSSC Services if you
regster at them.
Judging by http://www.swiss-sms-center.ch/, Swisscom is cheaper :-)
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (22.1°C)
___
swinog
=3598
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (21.4°C)
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Since the beginning of March, we seem to have been having trouble
sending SMS'es via this service-number - judging from the phone-bill,
the connection IS established, but then times out after 64 seconds and
no message is sent. Has anyone else been having such problems?
--
Per Jessen, Zürich
.
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (13.9°C)
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
of a modern
Linux UI. At the back of my mind I still considered it as a server
platform :)
Gee, Stanislav - KDE3 has been very solid for at least 3-4 years. I've
been using nothing else since 2005 or thereabouts.
/Per
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (4.0°C
Peter Keel wrote:
* on the Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 01:36:52PM +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
AFAICT from that list, you'd be fine on openSUSE too. Still, nothing
wrong with untar+config+make :-)
Yes, very wrong. Maintainability goes trough the floor. Or are you
sure not to miss a security-relevant
on openSUSE too. Still, nothing
wrong with untar+config+make :-)
/Per
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (0.6°C)
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
to sign
better contracts ads.
dress well to sign better contracts - it's not bad advice.
/Per
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (9.9°C)
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Jeroen Massar wrote:
Though I really do
not see why one would want to block the countries where great tech
comes from. Just use an RBL, and solely use it for scoring
Really useful stuff such as rbldnsd does not yet support IPv6 for
listings.
/Per
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (5.3°C
Steven Glogger wrote:
if there's a discussion starting in german, and someone is asking for
english it would be only polite to try to switch to english...
+1
/Per
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (23.7°C)
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http
in the path.
When the client has issued a TCP query, any half-way decent firewall
will know not to block the reply.
/Per
--
Per Jessen, Herrliberg (19.8°C)
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman
equipment that he can show off to the
other students in his class. For example some rackmount
device and a bit of optical fibre, if possible. There is no
need for the stuff to be in working order.
No problem Norbert, give me a call.
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (24.1°C
either.
/Per
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (2.1°C)
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Nicolas Strina wrote:
Ok the hw is quite important but
well .. I see lots of CPE able to do the job even on DSL.
Nico, which manufacturers do you have in mind?
/Per
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (4.2°C)
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
to use your email and others coming from your domain as I
see fit; by posting you are accepting that your long legally sounding
signature is invalid.
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin
-management.com
also worked fine.
dig @ns2.allytech.com. mail.rebel-management.com
also worked fine.
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg ZH
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
We're having a problem delivering mails to a Cybernet hosted exchange
server.
thanks
Per Jessen, Herrliberg
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Per Jessen wrote:
We're having a problem delivering mails to a Cybernet hosted exchange
server.
All sorted. Thanks.
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
a better set of customers.
Another option is to disable greylisting just for that one mailserver.
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Tonnerre Lombard wrote:
Salut, Per,
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:47:48 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
Another option is to disable greylisting just for that one
mailserver.
This implies that either you know all servers hosting broken scripts
(NP-complete I think) or your customers will always
Tonnerre Lombard wrote:
Salut, Per,
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:01:24 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
fixing something yourself is also pretty much an illusion, except for
those few people who are sufficiently involved. When have you last
_had_ to fix anything yourself in a stable release of any open
still do not make
use of this possibility. Which is why it is mostly an illusion.
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
last
_had_ to fix anything yourself in a stable release of any open source
project?
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg ZH
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
(OpenBSD) that still ships today.
You probably don't have the access anywhere, but try looking at IBMs TPF
and you'll find stuff dating back to the early sixties. Surprisingly,
TPF has always been open source - for license holders.
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
reviewed, then
yes, open source is quite possibly more secure.
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg ZH
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
One of my customers has just been told he needs to pay to get a DNS
reverse map entry for thei Green ADSL line with fixed IP.
Is that really true??
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin
Marc SCHAEFER wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 10:37:35AM +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
One of my customers has just been told he needs to pay to get a DNS
reverse map entry for thei Green ADSL line with fixed IP.
Is that really true??
I had a similar query lately, and [EMAIL PROTECTED] replied
Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
Anyway, who's going to send email directly from a broadband
connection, instead of using the ISP's relay? :-)
Provided everything is properly set up, why shouldn't they?
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
___
swinog mailing list
mapping to be set up properly.
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:44:46AM +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
Starting Monday this week, we've seen a significant delays and
timeouts
on our upstream name-servers. We saw something similar on our
Hetzner servers, but it seems to have gone away now. Has anyone else
seen
name = mailhost.aa795.ch.
78.232.141.195.in-addr.arpa name = mailhost.aerni.net.
plus another 20 hosts
This is a silly reverse setup. A reverse lookup should only return one
hostname, not 20.
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
___
swinog mailing list
not
expect more than one reply, and will always only process the first one.
It's just against what we are used to over the last 20+ years.
Plus it doesn't work.
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
--
http://www.spamchek.com/ - your spam is our business
in
the morning too. It has stopped since the weekend I think.
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
--
http://www.spamchek.com/ - your spam is our business.
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Per Jessen wrote:
We've got a customer whose emails (from other people but filtered by
us) are frequently being rejected by Netstreams harsh SPF-check. I've
asked Netstream to add our servers to their whitelist, but nothing has
happened.
I was just wondering -
1) how many of you guys use
Daniel Roethlisberger wrote:
Per Jessen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-05:
We've got a customer whose emails (from other people but filtered by
us) are frequently being rejected by Netstreams harsh SPF-check.
I've asked Netstream to add our servers to their whitelist, but
nothing has happened
Per Jessen wrote:
We have been thinking about SRS for a while - I'm wondering if SRS
is safe for mailservers that don't implement SPF/SRS? (I'll do my
research anyway, but just in case you know right away).
Looking at the status of libsrs2, I'm not very impressed. Also, we're a
postfix
We've got a customer whose emails (from other people but filtered by us)
are frequently being rejected by Netstreams harsh SPF-check. I've
asked Netstream to add our servers to their whitelist, but nothing has
happened.
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
--
http://www.spamchek.com/ - your spam is our
Per Jessen wrote:
it's a very simple patch:
http://jessen.ch/files/smsclient-originator-patch
Wow. That was obviously a very sought-after patch. Since my posting,
my weblog has about 60 unique IP-addresses for just this patch :-)
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
--
http://www.spamchek.com
Andre Keller wrote:
Hi swinoggers
I'm searching for a possibility to set the originator in sms_client...
(somewhere in ucp.c i asume).
I saw in the mailinglist of smsclient, that Per Jessen wrote about
that in August 2004. Are these patches still around?
Yep, I've still got it somewhere
Per Jessen wrote:
it's a very simple patch:
http://jessen.ch/files/smsclient-originator-patch
Correction:
http://jessen.ch/patches/smsclient-originator-patch
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
--
http://www.spamchek.com/ - your spam is our business
Per Jessen wrote:
Andre Keller wrote:
Hi swinoggers
I'm searching for a possibility to set the originator in
sms_client... (somewhere in ucp.c i asume).
I saw in the mailinglist of smsclient, that Per Jessen wrote about
that in August 2004. Are these patches still around?
Yep, I've
Mike Kellenberger wrote:
Hi all
Anbody else having problems to reach large websites, such as
www.microsoft.com or www.dell.com? Problems in or to the akamai
network?
I've been unable to get to www.dell.ch since sometime yesterday at
least.
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
--
http
Mike Kellenberger wrote:
was ok a few minutes ago, now the problem is back...
Access to dell.ch, ikea.com and sf.tv are now all fine from here
(easynet).
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
--
http://www.spamchek.com/ - your spam is our business
a moment, please take a look, and consider
signing yourself.
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
for the project.
It does seem somewhat problematic that you would list someone for having
a poorly configured auto-responder. How does that fit in with the
blacklist policy for Level1?
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http
-ignorant also lists
165 TLDs (.dk, .de, .eu ...) due to no WHOIS server or incomplete data
in server.
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
of it.
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
--
http://www.spamchek.com/ - your spam is our business.
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Benoit Panizzon wrote:
They know perfectly well that masses of spam are being sent via gprs
and that their ip is well blacklisted.
I was pretty certain that was the case. Thanks.
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
--
http://www.spamchek.com/ - your spam is our business
it won't work
Have you tried contacting studerus support? They are very fast and
extremely helpful.
Yep, Studerus is good, but Zyxel is not always so good. Not always -
I've been waiting for more than three years for a permanent fix for a
Zyxel ADSL router. :-(
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
[212.90.199.8] refused to talk to me: 421-We are not
currently accepting connections from 88.198.198.123. 421-Reason for
temporary block: sending us spam 421 Please try again later. We're
terminating this connection now.)
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
--
http://www.spamchek.com/ - your spam is our business
emails, but they
might very well use it for scoring.
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
--
http://www.spamchek.com/ - your spam is our business.
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Mario Iseli wrote:
Hi list :)
Please try to use more significant subjects for the threads here...
ACK.
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
--
http://www.spamchek.com/ - your spam is our business.
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http
the users determine what is spam and what
is not, getting the ISP out of the role of having to play judge on a
topic they don't master.
Nah, leave the spam-filtering to us :-)
The user and the ISP both have better things to do.
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
--
http://www.spamchek.com/ - your spam
Per Jessen wrote:
Charles Buckley wrote:
And then there is SORBS, which the ETH use, who have chosen to put
the shared server I use for mail on a blacklist for some reason.
mail.mauto.com is indeed listed by sorbs - I would check that your
server hasn't been compromised. Look for traces
Peter Keel wrote:
* on the Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 02:00:15PM +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
I would be interested to know why you find UCEprotect to be
unreliable and unprofessional?
Because of their delisting-procedure. How many networks will end
up in there which have been sending spam at some
into that.
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
--
http://www.spamchek.com/ - your spam is our business.
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
would be interested to know why you find UCEprotect to be unreliable
and unprofessional?
IMO any postmaster who blockes mails upon one blacklist entry is ...
(what was that polite description of moron?) ;)
There is no shortage of incompetent postmasters and mail-admins. :-(
/Per Jessen
Xaver Aerni wrote:
Wy is unproffesional,
UCEprotect is blocking AS I think this isn't proffesional.
Actually, UCEprotect is not blocking anything. They only provide the
means for other people to do so. Anyone who uses UCEprotect level3
have been duly warned.
/Per Jessen, Herrliberg
anything.
We use uceprotect level1 and -2, but not for blocking, only scoring.
/Per Jessen, Zürich
--
http://www.spamchek.com/ - your spam is our business.
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman
fined SFr5000 for sending out 5000
email invitations. (to existing or former customers).
--
/Per Jessen, Zürich
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
problemes. Sometime the Phones doesn't ring
etc.
We moved to an Aastra box just before Christmas last year. Not a big
one, 10-12 extensions.
Before then end of January I had shifted everything to a box running
Asterisk. Far more flexible.
--
/Per Jessen, Zürich
Per Jessen wrote:
Yes, that would be interesting - according to aspsms.ch:
ASPSMS allows you to send SMS over the TCP/IP protocol from any
program that can use ActiveX/OLE components ...
We can't do ActiveX, but a command line php client would be quite
useful.
never mind, I've just
.
Yes, that would be interesting - according to aspsms.ch:
ASPSMS allows you to send SMS over the TCP/IP protocol from any program
that can use ActiveX/OLE components ...
We can't do ActiveX, but a command line php client would be quite
useful.
--
/Per Jessen, Zürich
to think of something else
to do :-)
--
/Per Jessen, Zürich
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
1 - 100 von 114 matches
Mail list logo
