Same train from Lausanne for me.
--
Make the coupling between modules visible.
- The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plauger)
――― Original Message ―――
From: "lucas.dousse"
Sent: 29 octobre 2018 20:08 +0100
Subject: Re: [swinog] Swinog #34 Ride on 30th - Geneva
Hey!
A quick followup for my lightning talk from last year about BGP LLGR:
- Support has been added in BIRD 1.6, BIRD 2 and GoBGP. AFAIK, Cisco
still only supports it on VPN and FlowSpec families.
- Draft 4 has been published and IANA has assigned capability code and
well-known
❦ 11 mars 2018 09:54 +0100, Vincent Bernat <ber...@luffy.cx> :
>> Did you try contacting radb.net or the ARIN first? Their answers would
>> be interesting about it.
>
> As I am not familiar with how things work, I did not. But I have mailed
> CloudFlare NOC.
They to
❦ 11 mars 2018 09:49 +0100, Vincent Jardin :
> Did you try contacting radb.net or the ARIN first? Their answers would
> be interesting about it.
As I am not familiar with how things work, I did not. But I have mailed
CloudFlare NOC.
--
Localise input and output in
❦ 10 mars 2018 23:02 +0100, Vincent Bernat <ber...@luffy.cx> :
> I am peering with Atlantic Metro at DE-CIX. Their IRR record is
> "AS-AMC". I have noticed recently some invalid prefixes:
>
> $ bgpq3 -4 -R 24 -m 24 -A -J -E AS-AMC
> [...]
> route-filt
Hey!
I am peering with Atlantic Metro at DE-CIX. Their IRR record is
"AS-AMC". I have noticed recently some invalid prefixes:
$ bgpq3 -4 -R 24 -m 24 -A -J -E AS-AMC
[...]
route-filter 1.0.0.0/24 exact;
route-filter 1.1.1.0/24 exact;
I didn't check which members of the macro pulled
Hey!
I am updating the route/inetnum objects in the RIPE database and I am
wondering if I have to create more specific route objects. For example,
I have the following routes announced:
- 89.145.160.0/21
- 89.145.160.0/22 (FR7)
- 89.145.164.0/23 (DK2)
- 89.145.166.0/23 (GV2)
Each more
❦ 10 mars 2016 17:12 +0100, Andre Keller :
> in the last few months we had several security audits and all of them
> proposed to disable tcp timestamps. (i.e. on Linux
> net.ipv4.tcp_timestamps=0). AFAIK roundtrip time calculation in tcp
> relies on this and there might be
Hi!
At home, I have replaced Swisscom internet box by my own (Linux)
router. For IPv6, I noticed that the MTU is 1472 instead of 1480 (1500 -
20). For IPv4, MTU is 1500.
Does anyone know why the MTU on those 6RD links has to be 1472 and not
1480? Have other people with the same setup noticed
❦ 16 juillet 2014 15:40 +0200, Andre Keller a...@list.ak.cx :
we have customers that run basically an IPv6-only infrastructure with
some ipv4 reverse proxies in front of the services that need to be
publicly available. Some of these internal services can be accessed
using a VPN. The VPN
10 matches
Mail list logo