Re: AW: [swinog] Mail Server suggestions

2007-01-17 Diskussionsfäden Claudio Jeker
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 08:15:09AM +0100, Daniel Lorch wrote: Hi I'd use qmail-ldap on UNIX for it. It's as stable and as scalable as you can get. The largest installation I know of has more than 3 million actual users on it in a large cluster. But then I'm biased. The only thing coming

Re: AW: [swinog] Mail Server suggestions

2006-12-22 Diskussionsfäden Adrian Ulrich
Hi, The only thing coming close to it in scalability is Critical Path. Does the windows version of Critical Path still exist? ;-) After all it's a good/stable product. (Well: i dislike the CP-smtpd .. it works unless you try to do anything funky .. but replacing it with postfix/qmail isn't a

Re: AW: [swinog] Mail Server suggestions

2006-12-21 Diskussionsfäden Edoardo Martelli
Hi Mike Preferably it should run on windows (we're just not at home on the *nix platforms), have all it's config options in a sql database, provide anti-spam and anti-virus out of the box, have a feature-rich webmail client and be tailored for a small ISP. Our specs: ~700 Domains, ~4000

Re: AW: [swinog] Mail Server suggestions

2006-12-21 Diskussionsfäden Andre Oppermann
Edoardo Martelli wrote: Hi Mike Preferably it should run on windows (we're just not at home on the *nix platforms), have all it's config options in a sql database, provide anti-spam and anti-virus out of the box, have a feature-rich webmail client and be tailored for a small ISP. Our specs: