[swinog] Pro / Contra Smarthosting

2012-05-24 Diskussionsfäden Benoit Panizzon
Heya Another one on about the same topic. Business Customer with own Mailserver. They ofter want to know, which of our mailservers they can use as smarthost. We usualy tell them, that they operate an own fully connected mailserver which does not need any smarthost to deliver email to the

Re: [swinog] Pro / Contra Smarthosting

2012-05-24 Diskussionsfäden Oliver Schad
On Thu, 24 May 2012 17:07:58 +0200 Benoit Panizzon benoit.paniz...@imp.ch wrote: Business Customer with own Mailserver. They ofter want to know, which of our mailservers they can use as smarthost. We usualy tell them, that they operate an own fully connected mailserver which does not need any

Re: [swinog] Pro / Contra Smarthosting

2012-05-24 Diskussionsfäden Jeroen Massar
On 2012-05-24 17:07 , Benoit Panizzon wrote: Heya Another one on about the same topic. Business Customer with own Mailserver. They ofter want to know, which of our mailservers they can use as smarthost. We usualy tell them, that they operate an own fully connected mailserver which does

Re: [swinog] Pro / Contra Smarthosting

2012-05-24 Diskussionsfäden Fabian Wenk
Hello Benoit On 24.05.2012 17:07, Benoit Panizzon wrote: Some do not agree. The reasons the tell us are: - It Tech XY has told them that sending via a smarthost is much more reliable. And the customer is loosing the possibility to check on his own, if an e-mail has been delivered or is