On Tue, 20 January 2004 15:32:25 +0100, Marcel Stutz wrote:
Hi to all,
quick question witch is the best body/chassie of a Cisco Router
to use 2 x GigaBit Ethernet and 4 x FastEthernet ?
hmh... you know the Juniper M7i and M10i, yes? about all the
hosters you find in Belgium, Netherlands,
Hi Marcel,
we could become off- topic here, yes...
On Tue, 20 January 2004 16:05:32 +0100, Marcel Stutz wrote:
Hallo Alexander Koch,
Sorry das ic Offtop komme, ich habe nur immer von Juniper
H/W gehört und das grosse Carrier sie einsetzen. Kann ich
die wirklich 100% als Ersatz sehen für
--
Alexander Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] / ako4-ripe
IP Engineering, Tiscali International Network
Robert-Bosch-Strasse 32, D-63303 Dreieich, Germany
Phone +49 6103 916 480, Fax +49 6103 916 464
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com
On Fri, 27 February 2004 09:13:41 +0100, Andre Chapuis wrote:
Salut Pascal,
On a un router dédié 'native IPv6' au TIX.
Yeah, right, like GBLX and Sprint do it. Why not do it
right? Verio does it natively in their core, as do we.
Yes, yes, yes, Juniper here.
scnr,
Alexander
, it would be an
added service, it would normally not affect those that take
the plain 'TIX' or 'CIXP' service.
Regards,
Alexander
--
Alexander Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] / ako4-ripe
IP Engineering, Tiscali International Network
Robert-Bosch-Strasse 32, D-63303 Dreieich, Germany
Phone +49 6103 916 480
On Tue, 20 April 2004 12:09:58 +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
The MD5 frenzy was simply a work-around to a Cisco IOS bug.
time will show...
-ako,
disagreeing
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
On Fri, 30 April 2004 00:37:34 +0200, Daniel Lorch wrote:
Opinions?
Daniel, it will likely buy you not much as still there are
too many open relays or some 'owned' PC with a DSL line
sending stuff themselves to real SMTP servers configured
in the user's Outleak. So of all Spam sent how many of
On Fri, 4 June 2004 08:47:00 +0200, Viktor Steinmann wrote:
(german only, sorry) http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/47909
20 GBit/s going through DE-CIX - I think that's somehow like a birthday.
Since Arnold is reading here... did anyone hear or read
somewhere (again) that DE-CIX carries
Arnold,
let us quickly forget about Work-IX, BCIX, etc., not worth
it. Would you want to give any guess about how much of *all*
German internet traffic is exchanged at the DE-CIX?
Knowing the interconnects we have right now and given the
DTAG policy I say the 80% 'myth' ;-) does not work out
On Sat, 5 June 2004 13:42:31 +0200, Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
Alexander Koch wrote:
wondering how much longer public exchanges will stay for
networks like L3, Telia, Tiscali... and becoming offtopic g
Could you say anything further about this? What is Tiscali doing these
days? Already pulling
On Sun, 6 June 2004 16:56:25 +0200, Simon Leinen wrote:
[..]
Could you explain why you feel traffic over a 10G port to a public
exchange is harder to secure? E.g. compared to traffic over a 1G
port to a public exchange, or traffic over ten 1G private peerings.
I fail to figure this one out.
Hi Neil,
On Mon, 7 June 2004 11:18:30 +0100, Neil J. McRae wrote:
Sorry Alex, but I just don't get your point.
[..]
it all depends on your traffic levels - Well state the
obvious Alex!
I sometimes do, I know... ;-)
You seem to forget that you +do not know+ what is behind the
interface
On Sat, 26 June 2004 01:13:24 +0200, Arnold Nipper wrote:
That does not work if the mail is posted to several lists individually
as they all get different msg ids. You would have to trigger on content.
and argueing 'use procmail, and don't care' is not exactly
helping the case, where it was
fully.
-ako
--
Alexander Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] / ako4-ripe
IP Engineering, Tiscali International Network
Robert-Bosch-Strasse 32, D-63303 Dreieich, Germany
Phone +49 6103 916 480, Fax +49 6103 916 464
___
swinog mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
as nobody really knows,
it seems.
-ako
--
Alexander Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] / ako4-ripe
Phone +49 6103 916 480, Fax +49 6103 916 464
___
swinog mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
send the right packets to the wrong IP,
but that is nothing new.
--
Alexander Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] / ako4-ripe
Tiscali Int., Peering Coordination
Phone +49 6103 916 480, Fax +49 6103 916 464
___
swinog mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.init7
Ehm... there *has* to be a reason why the Juniper site has
authentication to get to that information. Just a thought.
Funny to spot two Cisco Security Advisories on NANOG the
minute I read the bulletin. ;-)
Alexander
___
swinog mailing list
On Wed, 26 January 2005 21:55:52 +0100, Pascal Gloor wrote:
Cisco Security Advisory: Crafted Packet Causes Reload on Cisco Routers
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20050126-les.shtml
you run mpls on a 2600/3600 ? do you ? ;p
there's more to it than this one. you do not have to
18 matches
Mail list logo
