[swinog] Anyone else lost traffic around 15:10?

Situation is back to normal again, but we saw decreased incoming traffic here. Anyone else? Best wishes, Matthias _ mhs @ internet AG Zürcherstrasse 204, CH - 9014 St. Gallen Phone +41 71 274 93 93, Fax +41 71 274 93 94 http://www.mhs.ch _

Re: [swinog] Anyone else lost traffic around 15:10?

Matthias Hertzog schrieb: Situation is back to normal again, but we saw decreased incoming traffic here. Anyone else? We had a ugly DDOS to a customer's network, situation is resolved now, customer is offline ... Sorry for the circumstances. F. ___

Re: [swinog] Anyone else lost traffic around 15:10?

Aah - we also wondered... here is what I saw: http://82.197.169.72/cgi-bin/smokeping.cgi Silvan Am 27.03.2008 um 15:41 schrieb Fredy Kuenzler: Matthias Hertzog schrieb: Situation is back to normal again, but we saw decreased incoming traffic here. Anyone else? We had a ugly DDOS to a c

Re: [swinog] Anyone else lost traffic around 15:10?

Salut, Silvan, On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:42:42 +0100, Silvan Gebhardt wrote: > here is what I saw: > > http://82.197.169.72/cgi-bin/smokeping.cgi The inside view: https://admin.ffii.org/cgi-bin/smokeping.cgi?start=2008-03-27+14%3A45&end=2008-03-27+15%3A45&target=World.Switzerland.Zurich.SolnetTIX1&

[swinog] Cisco Security Advisory: Vulnerability in Cisco IOS withOSPF, MPLS VPN, and Supervisor 32, Supervisor 720, or Route Switch Processor 720

FYI http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20080326-queue.shtml Seems that some of Swinoggers will have long upgrade nights soon. Chris ___ swinog mailing list swinog@l

Rant about DNS and TCP [was: Re: [swinog] Has Bluewin a DNS Problem]

Claudio Jeker writes: > Until recently only AXFR was using tcp, If you look at the original DNS specs, i.e. RFC 1035, RFC 1123, etc, you will find that the protocol always specified that any DNS queries can be performed over TCP. In particular, this is the normal fallback method when a query over