Re: [Sword-TAP] content negotiating for package formats

2011-01-28 Thread Graham Klyne
This is a perfectly reasonable option, if it fulfills community requirements. (I just want to on record with this, as I am also putting the case for use of existing conneg facilities.) But even if there's no negotiation, if there remains any choice of packaging format to send then there should be

Re: [Sword-TAP] An example Implementation (VIDEO)

2011-02-21 Thread Graham Klyne
On 18/02/11 12:52, David Tarrant wrote: I think that, if you want to upload a package, don't expect to be able to edit parts of the package. I feel if you want to edit using packages, then you delete the previous version and upload a whole new package. Supporting more features than

[Sword-TAP] Possible header for describing packaging selection

2011-03-22 Thread Graham Klyne
This comes from a completely different set of requorements, but there's a proposal for a Prefer: header that might be useful for indicating packaging preferences. Te Internet draft is timed out now, but I've pinged Marl Nottingham and he indicates the proposal is still alive (sort of).