[SyncEvolution] SyncEvolution 0.9.1 beta 1 released, SyncML server in 1.0 development branch

2009-10-13 Thread Patrick Ohly
SyncEvolution 0.9.1 beta 1 is available. It is going to replace 0.9 as the official stable release soon, so this is *the* chance to find and report problems before they sneak into the final 0.9.1 - die, bugs, die! SyncEvolution synchronizes personal information management (PIM) data like

Re: [SyncEvolution] lpia packages

2009-10-13 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 07:47 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 18:25 +0100, Frederik Elwert wrote: just a short egoistic notice: There seem to be no lpia packages for syncevolution 0.9. That's an oversight, my apologies. I've moved the build environment from estamos.de to

[SyncEvolution] writing unit tests for our new D-Bus API

2009-10-13 Thread Patrick Ohly
Hello! We are getting to a point where the D-Bus API should be usable for the GUI. The new code still needs to be tested, which is only possible by adapting the sync-UI and/or writing Python scripts to call the API. This is not a satisfactory situation. We should have the possibility to run such

Re: [SyncEvolution] syncevolution and oracle = transport failure

2009-10-13 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 15:54 +0100, Andrzej WÄ…sowski wrote: I know from our admin people, that they only support ssl - it is not possible to get this to work on phones not supporting ssl. Floating surrounded by red fish. I'm afraid I ran out of ideas. If you cannot get help from your admins,

Re: [SyncEvolution] gdbus-cxx and methods in base classes

2009-10-13 Thread Zhu, Yongsheng
Hi, Patrick Yongsheng, can you review this so? It's ready to replace the current code in the dbus-api branch. New solution uses boost bind and function to solve the issue. It should be workable. But I have a concern about private inheritance and boost bind. When boost does binding for a

[Syncevolution-issues] [Bug 6672] configure from sync-ui, all sync modes are two-way==affect command line

2009-10-13 Thread bugzilla
http://bugzilla.moblin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6672 --- Comment #1 from jku j...@linux.intel.com 2009-10-13 02:26:57 --- Sounds like a legitimate bug. I think this solves the problem without side-effects (jku branch): commit 49d0165e654d0c0502938a04e5a5b60496710121 Author: Jussi Kukkonen