On Fr, 2010-06-18 at 09:14 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
I'll start filing issues with API proposals.
Below a summary of the proposed enhancements. Does that sound right? Do
we need additional flags for starting a session, beyond the not for
sync?
How urgent is this, in other words, who wants to
Am Montag, den 28.06.2010, 14:42 +0200 schrieb Patrick Ohly:
On Fr, 2010-06-18 at 09:14 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
I'll start filing issues with API proposals.
Below a summary of the proposed enhancements. Does that sound right?
Looks all right, thanks for picking up my proposals!
Do
On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 21:50 +0100, Frederik Elwert wrote:
Yes, once the API is changed, clients should be able to find out which
API the server supports.
The notification daemon has a GetCapabilities() method, which returns an
array of strings:
Hello!
I am just about to release the first version of Genesis after the
rewrite. There were some points I noticed where there is room for
improvement regarding the interplay between SyncEvolution, sync-ui and
Genesis. Some points have been mentioned before, so please excuse some
duplications,
