[mailto:syncevolution-boun...@syncevolution.org] On Behalf Of Patrick Ohly
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 10:17 PM
To: Jussi Kukkonen
Cc: SyncEvolution
Subject: Re: [SyncEvolution] notes from design meetings last week
On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 16:51 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
My main takeaway
On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 07:31 +0100, Zhu, Yongsheng wrote:
Discussion ongoing on the list, reminder in Bugzilla: #6378
Together with implementation of DBus API, I'd like to take over this
and discuss issues of design and implemenation with you.
Is it ok?
Okay, but let's finish the current work
Am Mittwoch, den 23.09.2009, 11:32 +0300 schrieb Jussi Kukkonen:
Conceptually I liked the idea of a small client that runs as a service
and starts polling syncs and takes care of notifications. Practically
it may make more sense to keep the dbus server running... Especially
with
Patrick Ohly wrote:
On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 03:53 +0100, Zhu, Yongsheng wrote:
Errors in this case are:
* unexpected slow syncs
* nothing else?!
Mistakes in the backend?
Yes, that's one possibility. It'll manifest itself in a failed sync. So
how about suspending a source from syncing
