> Maybe this already has been said ;)
>
> This makes sense. What about other control characters?
>
We need to differentiate between on-the-wire format and storage format.
On-the-wire, I would escape only LF and the escape character. In
storage, I would escape any control character (which can be
> -Original Message-
> From: David Harrington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 11:33 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Syslog] timeline
>
> Hi,
>
> Chris and I are working on a schedule to help the WG meet its
> deliverables. We have not yet agreed on a
Hi,
Chris and I are working on a schedule to help the WG meet its
deliverables. We have not yet agreed on all the specific dates because
Chris is on (another) vacation, but should have a schedule posted
within a few days.
Here are two things we need to resolve soon.
1) whether draft-ietf-syslog
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 05:29 +0200, Rainer Gerhards wrote:
> Bazsi, all,
>
> I am not really able to follow the thread, but let me put in an
> important thought.
>
> We *must* allow LF inside the message. If we do not do that, it would
> cause problems with -protocol. This issue has been discussed
